View Full Version : famous ppl you have a lot in common with
i've been reading hue hefner's biography and i've come to find out i have A LOT in common with him, an uncanny amount of shit actually.
http://www.freeinfosociety.com/media/images/1570.jpg
mainly his attitudes towards things like work, sex, relationships, pop culture, and so forth.
and no im not trying to imply im a millionaire SEX baller, though i feel i eventually will be. He's not even a SEX baller, he created an ultra-ego to adventure into sex ballerism and hasn't seemed to come out of it. In all reality he's a trend nerd like myself.
TheBoarzHeadBoy
05-13-2011, 09:31 PM
I have a lot in common with Miley Cyrus...
We're the same age, our dogs have the same name, did similar things as children (until they bred her into a celebrity and all that), we're both introverted perfectionist types, we're both teen sex icons... It's legit.
jcGD7MeeWTY
Tina Fey, which is pretty embarrassing. Also Michael J Fox because I drive a car that travels through time.
TheBoarzHeadBoy
05-13-2011, 09:37 PM
What do you have in common with Tina Fey? and why is that bad? She's one of like 3 funny women on the planet... she's also a bangin' MILF.
What do you have in common with Tina Fey? and why is that bad? She's one of like 3 funny women on the planet... she's also a bangin' MILF.
I should have been more specific, her character in 30 rock. I'm not a multi millionaire.
And its funny cos you say shes a MILF and when I look at her I get confused, she has one of those faces that I can't tell if its ugly or cute. Really her face is like an optical illusion.
Out of curiosity who are the other funny women?
Sunz of Man
05-13-2011, 09:52 PM
Out of curiosity who are the other funny women?
Amy Poehler & Kaitlin Olson
STYLE
05-13-2011, 09:58 PM
tupac, not saying i'm a thug baller but we have the same attitudes toward women art and socioeconomic issues. pac wasn't a thug baller anyway he created an alter ego to explore thugish ballerism and never came out.
Amy Poehler & Kaitlin Olson
if thats true then women suck at being funny
Dokuro
05-13-2011, 10:15 PM
http://www.blogworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Penn-Jillette.jpg
pretty much everything except size
diggy
05-13-2011, 10:16 PM
I am comparabe to no famous person I know of except myself. That is to say I am unique and famous on Wucorp. I remain hidden like oyster pealrs deep in the sea. Blue moons are said to occur when dust particles or smoke is in the atmosphere and the moon appears to a casual observer to be unusually bluish, which is a rare event.
TheBoarzHeadBoy
05-13-2011, 10:22 PM
Amy Poehler & Kaitlin Olson
Thats pretty impressive what you did there.
And yes Sosa its been studied in depth, women aren't funny, when girls are funny it's actually imitation of a male behavior. Humor is part of our mating rituals and stuff and in general just an integral part of the male psyche. Girls get emotions, we induce them. Guys have emotions too, but it's not quite the same thing.
Dokuro
05-13-2011, 10:30 PM
saying woman aren't funny
QQyFMmr3PkE
Thats pretty impressive what you did there.
And yes Sosa its been studied in depth, women aren't funny, when girls are funny it's actually imitation of a male behavior. Humor is part of our mating rituals and stuff and in general just an integral part of the male psyche. Girls get emotions, we induce them. Guys have emotions too, but it's not quite the same thing.
Yeah female comedians are definitely a minority.
saying woman aren't funny
QQyFMmr3PkE
Silvermans aiight. I write a little like her.
I should have been more specific, her character in 30 rock. I'm not a multi millionaire.
And its funny cos you say shes a MILF and when I look at her I get confused, she has one of those faces that I can't tell if its ugly or cute. Really her face is like an optical illusion.
Out of curiosity who are the other funny women?
she fine dude, bone structure.
i know what you mean, though she goes from 'ok' to 'really fucking hot' not from 'ugly' to 'really fucking hot'
its cause of her personality. the fact she's funny makes her look confusing (hard to explain) and the fact that she doesn't 'act' sexy throws ppl off.
all you have to do is pay attention to bone structure, everything else is an illusion with women.
women with the facial bone structure of a pillow have been fooling men for years...britany spears, nicole richie...
also since she's awkward and nerdy it shows.
just my observations though
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3cib3fK139M/S_OnticnA3I/AAAAAAAAE04/Abla2ROzwSo/s400/TR+01.jpg
i also find that i have a lot in common with Theordore Roosevelt. Politically we have an identical philosophy and outlook on the world except he feels it's the 'duty' of the strong to help the weak, and i feel everyone should just leave everyone alone cause you're going to die anyway what's the point.
I also have a more irreverant view on things then he does, but otherwise we're the exact same in most respects. I agree with his views on might by merit, chivalry, 'the strenous life', displeasure with concentrated wealth/power, views on patriotism, oddly enough a lot of his views on race though most of them were racist I completely see where he's coming from, competition, war, and most of all masculinity.
hef and roosevelt are VERY different, but if you can combine them i feel it would be very meish.
But anyway, I'd say i'm more like Max Julien cos I be mackin the honeys, Alex Trebeck cos I have a moustache or OJ Simpson cos I'm a murderer.
she fine dude, bone structure.
i know what you mean, though she goes from 'ok' to 'really fucking hot' not from 'ugly' to 'really fucking hot'
its cause of her personality. the fact she's funny makes her look confusing (hard to explain) and the fact that she doesn't 'act' sexy throws ppl off.
all you have to do is pay attention to bone structure, everything else is an illusion with women.
women with the facial bone structure of a pillow have been fooling men for years...britany spears, nicole richie...
also since she's awkward and nerdy it shows.
just my observations though
pretty correct. Tina has a nice ass also
you never noticed tina got back?
Its interesting you say Hef and Roosevelt. Maybe you should run for pres and campaign for classy white house porn.
hahahaaha, i suppose it would be a perfect fit. turns out playboy wasn't at all intended to be porn. he wanted a nude here and there but wanted it to be what GQ magazine is right now. He actually modeled it after Esquire magazine.
but chose this
http://brettludeke.com.s60335.gridserver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/marilyn-monroe-playboy.jpg
as his first nude, which was then that time equivalent to this
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2_TcPCapWOs/TE35E5-SdTI/AAAAAAAAAAk/e_Awk_9uTNA/s1600/choke.gif
so niggas have been beating their meat since and it had to gradually become pornier and pornier.
Sunz of Man
05-13-2011, 11:39 PM
Thats pretty impressive what you did there.
haha were you gonna say them?
Dokuro
05-13-2011, 11:53 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3cib3fK139M/S_OnticnA3I/AAAAAAAAE04/Abla2ROzwSo/s400/TR+01.jpg
i also find that i have a lot in common with Theordore Roosevelt. Politically we have an identical philosophy and outlook on the world except he feels it's the 'duty' of the strong to help the weak, and i feel everyone should just leave everyone alone cause you're going to die anyway what's the point.
I also have a more irreverant view on things then he does, but otherwise we're the exact same in most respects. I agree with his views on might by merit, chivalry, 'the strenous life', displeasure with concentrated wealth/power, views on patriotism, oddly enough a lot of his views on race though most of them were racist I completely see where he's coming from, competition, war, and most of all masculinity.
hef and roosevelt are VERY different, but if you can combine them i feel it would be very meish.
that ass hole did not make that concept\
it was Kǒng Fūzǐ and latter "god"
and his view on patriotism is wrong
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
-Theodore Roosevelt
all though he said this i did the opposite any one he was all about his way or the highway he hated criticism and was often known to use his big stick on those who criticized him
he was one of the wost president in our history and a total fucking tyrant in ever sense of the word
he symbolized the beginning of Americas decline into socialism
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_TuQ1GMhHYR4/TUyGAkyQFxI/AAAAAAAAAMY/wAvEuUBDqG0/s1600/Rooseveltbigstick.jpg
that ass hole did not make that concept\
it was Kǒng Fūzǐ and latter "god"
and his view on patriotism is wrong
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
-Theodore Roosevelt
all though he said this i did the opposite any one he was all about his way or the highway he hated criticism and was often known to use his big stick on those who criticized him
he was one of the wost president in our history and a total fucking tyrant in ever sense of the word
he symbolized the beginning of Americas decline into socialism
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_TuQ1GMhHYR4/TUyGAkyQFxI/AAAAAAAAAMY/wAvEuUBDqG0/s1600/Rooseveltbigstick.jpg
bruh, humanity is vast and has been around for millenia, nobody you can recall 'came up with' the idea. no where in my post did i say he 'came up with' any idea, i just said we view things similarly.
He did believe that a people being against their president is treasonable. He also believed that a president being against his/her people is treasonable and an abuse of mandate and that the president being the paramount power in the country should dedicate his power to the bidding of those without it. Therefore, any element working against a force for public good is an enemy to the public good, and hence treasonable.
He believed firmly in democracy, and through this belief who ever won an election is someone the people should show loyalty to as that individual is to show unrelenting service to the people in return, and while he is in office to work with the president to get things done because you have the right to 'oppose' him in the voting booth if need be and not while he's trying to get something done, USELESS you can muster greater force of character then him and a stronger moral arguement/movement.
what he was speaking of are the people that are perpetually against the government for the fact that it's the government and nothing else. We're all very aware these ppl exist and will never be satisfied. He believed one of the weakest things a man can possess is a lack of patriotism or loyalty to the things that make him or he's a part of, and hence democracy is the only rational form of government to him because people, in his view, must give loyalty to the country no matter what because it's a part of their masculine duty, but in a democracy they can be active in changing the country for the better and into something worth defending as opposed to praying for its downfall.
america's 'decline' into socialism brought on by him is the reason there's big business regulation, employees aren't expendable slaves, there's a middle class, there isn't rat shit in your food and when there is you can do something about it, you know what you're eating, america gives aid to other countries, women are judged by merit, there are standards in public education, american's wildlife wasn't swept off the face of the earth, the poor can afford public transportation, and your country is strong, all things you benefit from and have the nerve to complain about but lack the fortitude to give up.
he didn't like being opposed, but if you can oppose him with a better idea, more drive, more devotion to your position and essentially 'defeat' him he accepted it. Basically his personality is incompatiable to pussies and pushovers. He's a firm believer in if you triumpth over your opposition then your right, which is similar to what i believe cause there's often no 'right' or 'wrong' and both sides are usually valid, therefore whomever wins the game of wits or force should have sway because you're gonna die anyways, so fuck it.
also, i do realize he has several character flaws. i also realize i have several character flaws. they just happen to be similar. hence the thread.
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 12:43 AM
what he believed and what he did are two deferent things
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
his belief in this loyalty is also none applicable to tyrannical governments because the people can't participate in the public debate and therefore don't owe their innately illegitimate government shit.
its like if you pick a dog and make it a pet you have the duty to take care of it cause it's YOUR dog and if you don't your a faggot, but if you come home and there's a fucking dog in your house that has situated himself there against your will you don't owe the dog shit and it only makes sense to get it out of the house.
what he believed and what he did are two deferent things
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
what he said he believed and what he did are different
but what he believed and what he did coorelate quite well.
He said the strong should help the weak, but he believed the strong obviously have more sense then the weak and thus the weak if they don't want to remain weak should listen to the strong, whose word, by merit of position, is worth more then the words of the weak.
so he spoke of being a good neighbor to america's weaker nieghbors, and was, until they went against america's requests or interests, then he believed 'wtf do they know, if they knew any better they wouldn't suck' and therefore did what he wanted anyways.
His interest wasn't in making other countries subserviant to the US, but in making sure the US isn't subserviant to other countries and doing whatever it takes to maintain that position.
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 12:51 AM
but he tried to destroy free speech
Franklin Delano Roosevel
made the FCC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Act_of_1934
he pushed his own moral agenda even against the will of the people
that is a tyrant
unless you agree with Judeo Christian morality
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 12:56 AM
i want argue his foreign policy thats something he did right
even though that so called nationalism is what caused Americas unyielding pride and willingness not to learn about others cultures
but i will maintain the idea that he was bad for the american people
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 12:58 AM
sorry i'm high i take back that one
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 12:59 AM
i mean his Franklyn was allot worst
but i want go into that
i think he was excellent for the people, expecially at the time.
what you said is actually the opposite of the truth. He was the first president to leave the US during his tenure. Prior to that americans were so isolationist the idea of an US president, expecially one still in office leaving the country was revolutionary.
He took pictures in Cuba, Brazil, Central America, and Africa that introduced the average american to the idea that these places exist. He also used his Great White Fleet to circumnavigate the globe and introduce everyone else to America while collecting cultural goods from different countries on the trip to bring back to America and show the people. He was also the first president to seek to 'understand' the african american community by openly communicating with its leaders, inviting them to dinner, and encouraging their attempts to improve their communities like Black colleges.
he was the president that introduced the world to america and america to the world, so it's not fair to say he's the one that made americans not want to learn about other cultures when since the Mayflower Americans have been hideously ignorant of everyone else and proud of it.
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 01:05 AM
but none of that changed the fact that he pushed is Christian morals like frank
i mean after all as long as we have a Christian president they will always put god before the people
with an exception to Washington but the fist thing he did was tax his own bootlegging people
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 01:07 AM
i think he was excellent for the people, expecially at the time.
what you said is actually the opposite of the truth. He was the first president to leave the US during his tenure. Prior to that americans were so isolationist the idea of an US president, expecially one still in office leaving the country was revolutionary.
yeah at the time he was necessary but allot of evil can be necessary
but that's also one of the reasons i cited him and hef as 2 ppl im like. they're both very dictatorial and i'll admit it's a horrible character flaw of mine. Once i get involved in something and im passionate about it i would rather everyone just shut up and go along. other ppl's input kills my passion for something gradually and if i dont feel like it's 'mine' i have a hard time caring enough to make it great, and when it doesn't work out i have a bad habit of blaming other people more then myself or the fallacies in my own idea ..#1 sign of a dictator.
as i've become older i've learned to catch myself when i start getting too passionate and overbarring about an idea. I go out of my way to go against my nature and take myself away from positions of power or control over a project and allow it to take a more organic growth while taking more pride in my contribution then my preconcieved obsession with what it 'should' be.
Hef was like this with playboy. He stated very early on that the magazine is to emulate his personality completely and that anyone elses input is not welcomed. He also was involved in every detail of it to the point that everyone else felt like they didn't have a job and they were basically paid to just watch him do what they're supposed to be doing.
but whenever i seem to relax grip on things they just end up sucking more lol. i remember we has a presidents debate and my partner was some whore in highschool. We won first, 3rd and fifth place out of like 12 teams. we didn't win second because by default whoever lost the final gets second, and we didn't win 4th cause that was the debate i decided to let her speak LOL. i regret it till this day but everyone started narcing on her that she wasn't doing any work and getting a free A so the teacher talked to her not understanding that this is exactly how i wanted it.
Or when i was conducting a play for this huge banquet. I took over the whole thing, but when i let my 'partner' contribute he wanted to make the main character an emotionaless faggot named Dbanj cause he had a man crush on Dbanj and wanted 90% of the sound track to be Dbanj music (which if you don't know all of Dbanj's songs one was or another are about his dick). I had to just cut that faggot off for the good of the common man lol, fuck that.
the result was the play was excellent and they tried to emulate it for 2 straight years after but everyone kept saying the first was the best, even this next coming banquet there's a debate on if there should be a play (the one i did was the first)
being this way makes it hard to find good help when i want to do something that required a lot of effort (which is a lot), but im working on being more lax and less 'into it' all the time.
Rob Swanson
05-14-2011, 01:57 AM
Riff Raff
not because I'm a wigger, but because he created a wiggerd persona for exploring the inner workings of wiggerism and wigsta-economics. Plus he takes the lazy route like me and uses butter flavored cooking spray when cooking calamari, YAMS, or french fries.
Or anything that might stick. Riff Raff is the Hugh Hefner of baller wigga coultry. Suck my dick wucorp with mothafuckin condom.
wshhQS2ip397EKCx6Si6
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 02:10 AM
other people i'm like
http://www.kevchino.com/graffix/bandphotos/greggaffin_bp.jpg
http://www.reidreport.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/chuckd.jpg
http://www.jeremycaplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/barbara_ehrenreich_picture.jpg
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 02:11 AM
all my madness aside i'm pretty much a down to earth rebel with a pension of going on rants about social matters
Rob Swanson
05-14-2011, 02:12 AM
^
^
^
http://www.lostzilla.net/varios/curios_amigohurley.jpg
Dokuro
05-14-2011, 02:20 AM
i can see it
http://www.theflickchicks.com/flick-chicks/images/movie-photos/The%20Flick%20Chicks%20Movie%20Reviews%20critics%2 0The%20New%20Guy.jpg
i wanted to get the gif but i'm to lazy
dude DJ Qualls is the shit even the names fucking boss
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.