PDA

View Full Version : Suggest me a poster


TSA
05-29-2011, 02:11 PM
I hope ppl don't think im joking when i say i don't read a lot of your posts.
i literally can't get myself to read a lot of your posts, and when i do based on it's positioning in the thread i seldom look over to see the name that posted it unless it's a name that matters and that i can recognize right away.

i can't spend all day as a reading ass nigga. just reading and reading and reading and shit. It's not even on purpose, just a habit.
i also can't read gavins posts when they're too long though i will admit he matters *hug*


BUT! i had a revelation when i read Fatal Ovaltine's posts. He's fucking hilarious dude, but only hilarious at how starkly unfunny he is. He comes off as the guy that you would make a casual 'chuckle worthy' joke too just for the shits, and then months after he keeps bringing it up cause he thinks it's your 'inside joke'. Just a read hermaphoditic cornhole that lacks the charisma of a man and the nipples of a woman.


it's really funny, now, to go back and read his hidiously unfunny diatribe, which brings me to the point...


SUGGEST ME SOME POSTERS! i want to rediscover the wucorp experience by pulling societies disguarded toys out of the proverbial basement where they've been left to dwell. What are some unimportant faggots that will aid in my gleeful enjoyment of laughing at others.





http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__7HSg1l8Ccc/TKH8ujhsTWI/AAAAAAAAFDI/p0zYmMhY-cA/s1600/Butthole+Surfers+-+Double+Live.jpg
1%

EAGLE EYE
05-29-2011, 03:02 PM
LOL

Excellent analysis of of Fatal. You hit every point.

I'd suggest you actually read L1NKZ posts because he's dead serious with everything he writes in them. I think the last time I read one, he stated the internet was alien technology.

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 03:16 PM
the internet alien tech bwaaaaaahahahaah your right that is funy

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 04:24 PM
fmr. canadian defense minister...
mhElE3JILAE


three niggas who went into space

buzz aldrin
zBIK9TvZJSg

edgar michell
a8XaHw-RO0c

gordon cooper
dvPR8T1o3Dc

beautifulrock
05-29-2011, 04:32 PM
Apparently, it's now STYLE's job to ruin threads.

beautifulrock
05-29-2011, 04:43 PM
While I do think TSA has some valid points, I reject his original premise that he doesn't read because he finds the posts interesting, it's that he just doesn't read. With his 3rd gradeish writing style and lack of witticisms, if the internet were a piece of paper, you get the sense he would be writing in crayon. I mean his best humor hotbuttons are large bold type and a nauseatingly long chain of the same picture copy and pasted.


Don't worry, he probably won't read this anyway.

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 04:48 PM
While I do think TSA has some valid points, I reject his original premise that he doesn't read because he finds the posts interesting, it's that he just doesn't read. With his 3rd gradeish writing style and lack of witticisms, if the internet were a piece of paper, you get the sense he would be writing in crayon. I mean his best humor hotbuttons are large bold type and a nauseatingly long chain of the same picture copy and pasted.


Don't worry, he probably won't read this anyway.

i agree

then again i just turn in papers of sleeping drool

Mic Tyson
05-29-2011, 04:53 PM
LOL

Excellent analysis of of Fatal. You hit every point.

I'd suggest you actually read L1NKZ posts because he's dead serious with everything he writes in them. I think the last time I read one, he stated the internet was alien technology.


hahahahahaha, i did just startin noticing this guy talks about weird shit like that

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 04:58 PM
fmr. canadian defense minister...
mhElE3JILAE


three niggas who went into space

buzz aldrin
zBIK9TvZJSg

edgar michell
a8XaHw-RO0c

gordon cooper
dvPR8T1o3Dc

there all made and have no evidence

BLACK BART SIMPSON
05-29-2011, 05:36 PM
art vandelay dude is funny as fuck

CEITEDMOFO
05-29-2011, 06:20 PM
fmr. canadian defense minister...
mhElE3JILAE


three niggas who went into space

buzz aldrin
zBIK9TvZJSg

edgar michell
a8XaHw-RO0c

gordon cooper
dvPR8T1o3Dc

+1 ROBBY AND THE REST OF YOU FAGS ARE SAYING THERES NO ALIENS ARE BIBLE HUMPERs
PEACE
GLBeeKmlE_o

RcrzD0PfyPs
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW LOUIs :lmao:

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 06:25 PM
there all made and have no evidence
made? keep your bullshit conspiracy theories to yourself.

BASCO
05-29-2011, 07:30 PM
check two is a real fuckin character

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 07:46 PM
+1 ROBBY AND THE REST OF YOU FAGS ARE SAYING THERES NO ALIENS ARE BIBLE HUMPERs
PEACE
GLBeeKmlE_o

RcrzD0PfyPs
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW LOUIs :lmao:

but..ceited.......

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Onz7h53K9nY/SXF3G7guE3I/AAAAAAAAGK0/rADn-R7oxPU/s400/maria%2Bholic+02+(6).png
i am god



and i do believe there are extraterrestrials just there not here



it illogical to believe they are form out side of the milky way
and sense we are in the boonies in our own galaxy it seams unlikely that that any one would want to come here to spread there influence

and sense the milky way is a relatively young galaxy it would be more likely that technologically wise they are only about 100 ahead of us because the Christians set us back those years do you think its possible in 100 years that man would be able to travel outside of are galaxy let alone Sol and what if there culture was held back even longer do to religious influence

when you think of ET you think
some supremely powerful intelligent creature
http://lovecraft1890.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/cthulhu-11.jpg

but when i think of ET i think of a creature who has the same problems as us just a slightly deferent genetic code and evolutionary line
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/1073/238903-persi_large.png

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 07:51 PM
oh and lizard are a lower life form they cant compete with mammals there is no way a lizard would be capable of space travel they cant even figure out how to adapt to extreme cold

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 07:54 PM
100 years? yeah that sounds about right....psssshhhhht.

think about the library of alexandria. its burning set us back at least 1000 years.

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 08:07 PM
the dinos were warm blooded. wtf are you talking about?

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:08 PM
well thanks to the Illuminati most of that info survived the rest of it is in the Vatican under security and the estimate is about 100-500 years but 1000 sounds pretty sound to i mean that what the half the dark ages


so i wont argue on that

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:09 PM
the dinos were warm blooded. wtf are you talking about?

i didn't say the dinos but yeah there also a classic example of genetic stupidity

we survived the comet fuckers

go team mammal

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 08:17 PM
crocs and tortoises are over 100 million years old. they survived the comet too. if there was a comet. i mean how the hell did anything survive that? and how the hell did the earth survive a collision with a mars-sized object that supposedly created the moon?

BLACK BART SIMPSON
05-29-2011, 08:18 PM
crocs and tortoises are over 100 million years old. they survived the comet too. if there was a comet. i mean how the hell did anything survive that? and how the hell did the earth survive a collision with a mars-sized object that supposedly created the moon?

co-sign this

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:27 PM
the earth is resilient...... just like mammals

and it wasn't that big your over exaggerating like most of you ETfuckers do


you know there still allot of sea creatures we haven't discovered yet

who knows maybe i can still have my pet Ika
https://blogs.emory.edu/animec/files/2010/10/ika-musume_ep02_25.jpg


but i'm getting of topic what was the topic again


oh yeah the comet that created the moon was allot oder then the one that wiped out the big morons

stupid we tried to tell them what the point of getting so big your just going to make your self more vulnerable to disease and famine

but next thing you know the sky is blanketed by dusts the plants cant grow the herbs cant eat then the idiots die from disease and famine

Teh KillaBee
05-29-2011, 08:39 PM
SUGGEST ME SOME POSTERS! i want to rediscover the wucorp experience by pulling societies disguarded toys out of the proverbial basement where they've been left to dwell. What are some unimportant faggots that will aid in my gleeful enjoyment of laughing at others.

I'm not sure if you're aware of what irony is, but have you read any of your posts?

BLACK BART SIMPSON
05-29-2011, 08:39 PM
i dont think ive ever heard someone insult dinosaurs like that. not cool broham

Teh KillaBee
05-29-2011, 08:43 PM
if you'd like to see what an overabundance of sperm, sexual frustration, and latent homosexuality does when not properly released in a positive manner, may I suggest to you Charles Jones and Citrus Moa. They're one the reasons that incest is illegal and beastiality is still tolerated is some states.

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:44 PM
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SjVi-OWqHzs/S5jKFDyTYkI/AAAAAAAADW8/e3I3J7g8x-M/s320/Megazostrodon.bmp

kills your dinosaur well at least out lives

Teh KillaBee
05-29-2011, 08:48 PM
i dont think ive ever heard someone insult dinosaurs like that. not cool broham

look here bud, dino's weren't even real. Scientists just made them up to troll christians

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:51 PM
.... are you stupid

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:55 PM
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20101116191923/walkingwithdinos/images/4/40/Steropodon.jpg

is cuter then your raptors

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 08:57 PM
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110429203061/walkingwithdinos/images/thumb/a/a0/001.jpg/400px-001.jpg


owns your T-rex

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 09:01 PM
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5180WCQKYDL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

mercs your tv shows

diggy
05-29-2011, 09:27 PM
I agree with rock. Also, TSA, aren't you embarrassed that you've been here since 2005 and you're JUST NOTICING some things about FREQUENT posters?

Do you really need Wucorp to suggest you posters to read? SMH.

Uncle Steezo
05-29-2011, 10:27 PM
anyway... back on topic.
1. the alleged meteor was 10km wide. not quite a little one.
2. if the plants died then all animal life would have died.
3. Raptor Jesus will smite thee for your blasphemy.

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 10:54 PM
yeah well mammal Jesus will turn your raptor Jesus

into oil

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 10:55 PM
and just most of the plants there was enough for smaller life

Teh KillaBee
05-29-2011, 11:07 PM
^^^^mammal dick rider

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:17 PM
http://i.qkme.me/c2o.jpg

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:25 PM
it merely a matter of cuteness
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ksSdBOI1Ppk/R1EXkDfbNtI/AAAAAAAABF4/c6yaXINUjQU/s400/cute+cayote.jpg
http://www.adamtglass.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/T-rex.jpg

show me one dino that half as cute as any mammal and i will retract my statements

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:28 PM
this thread will now be snuffed out by my ultimate weapon
unrelenting cuteness
http://www.zifle.dk/kittehs/1112_-_animated_gif_azu-nyan_k-on_kawaii_nakano_azusa_nekomimi.gif

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:32 PM
http://pixdaus.com/pics/124088250341hd2zh.jpg

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:33 PM
http://www.funny-potato.com/images/animals/rats/domesticated-rat.jpg

Dokuro
05-29-2011, 11:36 PM
http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa228/ArigatoSasuke/CuteKitty.jpg
choke on it

TSA
05-30-2011, 12:02 AM
LOL

Excellent analysis of of Fatal. You hit every point.

I'd suggest you actually read L1NKZ posts because he's dead serious with everything he writes in them. I think the last time I read one, he stated the internet was alien technology.
damn dude, lol
i'll have to check him out, yes homo

SKAMPOE
05-30-2011, 12:47 AM
http://spaceghetto.org/images/11tvt.jpg

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 01:00 AM
http://data.whicdn.com/images/683528/uFlnyxJUForehtl24dvemes2o1_500_thumb.jpg?125185089 3http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/l/lizard-8437.jpg
http://www.onlineweblibrary.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/geico-gecko.jpg
http://www.onlineweblibrary.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/gecko3.jpg
http://williamfope.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/barney-amp-friends-georgia.gif
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_R6PPTYUfumA/TIXEEG02gTI/AAAAAAAAAAk/XrOLFdbfcJU/s1600/2008_09_26_rawr_dinosaur.jpg

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 01:27 AM
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2145/2099704865_aff12e1b18.jpg
http://ih2.redbubble.net/work.395304.4.flat,550x550,075,f.cute-as-a-reptile.jpg

BLACK BART SIMPSON
05-30-2011, 01:33 AM
lizards are cool as fuck

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 02:08 AM
http://www.houstonzoo.org/attachments/wysiwyg/3/Toby-4a.jpg
http://www.alaska-in-pictures.com/data/media/1/raccoon-face_9700.jpg
http://pixdaus.com/pics/XjyZ2V4lRI3dvDQlNA.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljkorjPZ6X1qcwnfco1_500.jpg
http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/s/seal-8804.jpg


its not even a contest



this thread is sooo... cute

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 02:13 AM
http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/b/baby_boar-7742.BabyWildBoarSusscrofa
http://www.therobotspajamas.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/knute-the-baby-polar-bear.jpg
http://cdn.activedesktopwallpapers.com/wallpapers/94/Cute-Kitten-Sleeping-512X384-94.jpg

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 02:14 AM
do you really think lizards can compare
this cuteness is off the charts





http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0eEyj8wyNDE/SsnBhICG9pI/AAAAAAAAArI/EURvsAC99wQ/s320/cute+anime.jpg

EAGLE EYE
05-30-2011, 02:32 AM
Imagine if the Geicko lizard had styles voice and Louis's bisexual swag? LoLz

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 03:51 AM
http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/006/cache/mole-rat_629_600x450.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mfR4ZOrIiUY/TTMN8gIArII/AAAAAAAAAGM/3aNb_RnfiCc/s1600/AyeAye1.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_F5MIuOJd-_s/Sl6RVJ_904I/AAAAAAAAAPw/uacq5sOwje0/s320/gal_ugly_14.jpg
http://slothoftheday.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/02-matses-indigenous-sloth1.jpg?w=640&h=480
http://amazingdata.com/images/Theworldstop10fattestanimals_8FCB/Theworldstop10fattestobesityanimalsmonkey.jpg
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRO39n-oyG0t-jUBYoxRTUVot6qo6zZM4TtBbyGBzB_McdJez60KQ&t=1http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRO39n-oyG0t-jUBYoxRTUVot6qo6zZM4TtBbyGBzB_McdJez60KQ&t=1http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRO39n-oyG0t-jUBYoxRTUVot6qo6zZM4TtBbyGBzB_McdJez60KQ&t=1

ALCATRAZ
05-30-2011, 04:16 AM
http://www.houstonzoo.org/attachments/wysiwyg/3/Toby-4a.jpg

hehe

TSA
05-30-2011, 11:07 AM
damn, i can't believe i wore dress shirts under sweaters with text on them

Olive Oil Goombah
05-30-2011, 11:13 AM
crocs and tortoises are over 100 million years old. they survived the comet too. if there was a comet. i mean how the hell did anything survive that? and how the hell did the earth survive a collision with a mars-sized object that supposedly created the moon?


i think that happened before most life.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 11:27 AM
The moon and Earth are comprised of totally different surface materials. The odds that the moon actually came from the Earth is next to zero. There's a better chance that the moon is actually a hollowed out death star.

Soul Controller
05-30-2011, 12:05 PM
The moon and Earth are comprised of totally different surface materials. The odds that the moon actually came from the Earth is next to zero. There's a better chance that the moon is actually a hollowed out death star.


i dont know if id go that far,, but the moon is deff not from/a part of earth

various ancient cultures have great storys about the moon,.


i feel ive missed out in this thread,, lovely pictures!!
i dont know how many times i went awww

but your missing out the cutest and deadliest creature ever.. spiders!!!

http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/camel-spiders.jpg


http://media.cakecentral.com/modules/coppermine/albums/userpics/10783/normal_spiders.jpg



http://www.ohmboy.com/blog/images/gardengal.jpg
http://www.stlzoo.org/images/brown_recluse02_sm.jpg

http://www.spiderzrule.com/spider208/Wolf%20Spiders%204-04-08%2014.JPG

http://www.soniamack.com/carnival2008/images/Female%20A/spider-c-005.jpg

i have a question for louis.. i can see you love mammals..

can you answer me why, humans are the only mammals with their 2nd and 3rd chromosomes grafted/spliced/intergrated together..
and what benefits do you think having the 2nd and 3rd chromosomes joined up, gives humans
and one last question,, what is the oldest part in the human mind known as, and what are its traits?

thankyou.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 12:22 PM
and how the hell did the earth survive a collision with a mars-sized object that supposedly created the moon?

Good question! Several theories have been formulated in regards to the earth's satellite origin. The only theory that makes sense would be the impact theory. As you stated, a mar-sized object collided with earth about 4.4 bya. When the large body struck earth, it ejected large amounts of the earth's crust and mantle into orbit, but not iron. The material that was ejected into earth's orbit during the impact formed to be the moon. Why is this theory accepted? The moon is made up of the same material as the earth, so does oxygen.

Of course, Brock would say that I'm wrong and stupid. If you don't believe me, here's www.Google.com.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 12:25 PM
The moon and Earth are comprised of totally different surface materials. The odds that the moon actually came from the Earth is next to zero. There's a better chance that the moon is actually a hollowed out death star.

i dont know if id go that far,, but the moon is deff not from/a part of earth

various ancient cultures have great storys about the moon,.



Please tell me that you guys are joking?!

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 12:30 PM
I'm not saying you're wrong, just stupid. The surface of the moon is comprised mostly of Titanium, which is extremely rare on Earth. In fact, some suggest that the Titanium we have on Earth is a direct result of being blown off the moon by asteroids and shot through space, impacting Earth. In order to create as much Titanium as there is on the moon from Carbon, Hydrogen, and Iron, it would take longer than the Earth has existed. There are other ways moons become moons other than being blasted out from a chunk of planet. Moons can break alignment with other planets during a gravitational event like a black hole, and be thrust into a different solar system. The Earth's gravity catches the moon and forms an elliptical path with it. Voila.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 12:38 PM
The moon is made up of the same material as the earth, so does oxygen.

Of course, Brock would say that I'm wrong and stupid. If you don't believe me, here's www.Google.com (http://www.Google.com).
Read the first sentence carefully, and tell me how it does not sound stupid. Go ahead, read it aloud to yourself. I'll wait, then you can tell me how it isn't retarded.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 12:45 PM
I'm not saying you're wrong, just stupid. The surface of the moon is comprised mostly of Titanium, which is extremely rare on Earth. In fact, some suggest that the Titanium we have on Earth is a direct result of being blown off the moon by asteroids and shot through space, impacting Earth. In order to create as much Titanium as there is on the moon from Carbon, Hydrogen, and Iron, it would take longer than the Earth has existed. There are other ways moons become moons other than being blasted out from a chunk of planet. Moons can break alignment with other planets during a gravitational event like a black hole, and be thrust into a different solar system. The Earth's gravity catches the moon and forms an elliptical path with it. Voila.

Um, Brock, this theory has been reviewed several times and it has been rejected. Why? As I stated before, the moon and the earth are primarily made up of the same material. That's why the capture theory (I believe that's what it's called) doesn't make sense.

And, yes, the moon has been struck like a billion times by meteorites, comets and asteroids. I would expect there to be traces of metal due to the fact that the moon has a very little atmosphere.

In regards to the oxygen comment, Brock, you have EVER analyzed rocks before? You'll find that oxygen does exists in rocks. In the case of the moon, it has nothing to do with the atmosphere.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 12:57 PM
Read the first sentence carefully, and tell me how it does not sound stupid. Go ahead, read it aloud to yourself. I'll wait, then you can tell me how it isn't retarded.

Brock, you're not thinking this through. The moon contains oxygen IN THE ROCKS! It's call geochemistry. Look it up!

Olive Oil Goombah
05-30-2011, 01:00 PM
brock is the worst poster here, i would not suggest him.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 01:07 PM
If what you were saying were true, it would be called the large collision law, and not the large collision hypothesis. And like the Big Bang theory and other formerly held scientific world beliefs, that one is going by the wayside. I'm not saying your wrong, you're probably right. But suggesting that no other celestial bodies have the same surface materials as Earth is simply absurd. There are too many strange coincidences with the moon that are seen in no other celestial bodies, for it all to be random. For one, the same side always faces the Earth. It is in exactly the right spot to form a perfect eclipse. It has no global magnetic field.

Is much older than previously expected and maybe even older than the Earth or even the Sun. Earth’s age is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old at the most by some scientists – while various moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old. What’s more puzzling is that the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

On Earth and the composition of other planets, the heavier elements are normally found in the core while the lighter materials are concentrated at the surface. But not so with the moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced, that several geologists proposed that the refractory compounds must have been brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They are adamant. They don’t know how, but there is no other way for this to have happened!

Moon rocks are magnetized. This is very strange because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. And it could not have originated from a “lose call” with Earth because such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

Hundreds of “moonquakes” are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region.
What is really fascinating about these events, is that they were observed to be identical in their activity and they occur precisely and periodically, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.

The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s mean density is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.”
Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is “simply a cavity.”
MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field… indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.”
In Carl Sagan’s work Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”

On the 20th November 1969, the crew of Apollo 12 jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon some 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site. This created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics. The moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was intentionally repeated with Apollo 13, when they allowed the third stage to impact the moon. The results were even more startling. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and travelled to a depth of twenty-five miles. This lead to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light, or even no core.

The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. The astronauts encountered extreme difficulty when they tried to drill into the maria. The maria is composed primarily ilmenite, which is a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”. What is even more puzzling, was the discovery of Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 in lunar rocks (elements not found in nature on Earth). And a further surprise was finding rustproof iron particles.

It is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 01:10 PM
Brock, you're not thinking this through. The moon contains oxygen IN THE ROCKS! It's call geochemistry. Look it up!
I'm not talking about facts or anything pertinent to the conversation. Just read the sentence. The WAY you illiterate, how is it not stupid?

TSA
05-30-2011, 01:26 PM
Good question! Several theories have been formulated in regards to the earth's satellite origin. The only theory that makes sense would be the impact theory. As you stated, a mar-sized object collided with earth about 4.4 bya. When the large body struck earth, it ejected large amounts of the earth's crust and mantle into orbit, but not iron. The material that was ejected into earth's orbit during the impact formed to be the moon. Why is this theory accepted? The moon is made up of the same material as the earth, so does oxygen.

Of course, Brock would say that I'm wrong and stupid. If you don't believe me, here's www.Google.com (http://www.Google.com).
you know you and your cohorts are now implying that crocodiles are older then the moon right?

TSA
05-30-2011, 01:27 PM
brock is the worst poster here, i would not suggest him.
dude, for real, elohle!

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 01:38 PM
Exposed

http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2103687&postcount=91

For real, dude.

cDAq5tyfk9E

EAGLE EYE
05-30-2011, 01:39 PM
lmao, why are you guys always trying to turn the board into social studies or science class?

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 01:42 PM
I just posted that shit from a conspiracy site to get tetris all riled up, but i guess he had some dinosaur bones to excavate or something.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 02:07 PM
On Earth and the composition of other planets, the heavier elements are normally found in the core while the lighter materials are concentrated at the surface. But not so with the moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced, that several geologists proposed that the refractory compounds must have been brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They are adamant. They don’t know how, but there is no other way for this to have happened!

Maybe is was the result of a meteorite, comet, or asteroid impact. Since the moon has a very weak atmosphere, objects that land on the moon's surface wouldn't burn up in the atmosphere. That's something to think about.

Moon rocks are magnetized. This is very strange because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. And it could not have originated from a “lose call” with Earth because such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

Yes. The moon doesn't have dipolar magnetic field. I believe the reason why the moon doesn't have a magnetic field is because the moon was in it's early stages and therefore it didn't have the required time to created a magnetic field like earth did (I forgot the term but it has something to do with a celestial body forming a magnetosphere. It's the process through which a celestial body undergoes rotation, convection, and electrically conducting metal liquid that rotates around the solid iron-nickel core to create a magnetic field).

And as for the moon rocks being magnetized, that could be where most of meteorite, comets, and asteroids bombarded that spot during the moons development stage. Another thing, the moon is a small body compared to earth. I believe that due to its small size, it couldn't differentiate the way it was suppose to.


Hundreds of “moonquakes” are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region.
What is really fascinating about these events, is that they were observed to be identical in their activity and they occur precisely and periodically, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
On the 20th November 1969, the crew of Apollo 12 jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon some 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site. This created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics. The moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was intentionally repeated with Apollo 13, when they allowed the third stage to impact the moon. The results were even more startling. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and travelled to a depth of twenty-five miles. This lead to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light, or even no core.

Hmm. The moon doesn't contain plate tectonics. It's solid all the way through. However, they're volcanoes on the moon. Now, the moon does have a very small solid iron core based on seismic evidence. Twenty-five miles isn't enough depth to determine whether a celestial body like the moon contains a core. Whoever took that measurement didn't do it right. There has to be a mistake!

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 02:11 PM
I just posted that shit from a conspiracy site to get tetris all riled up, but i guess he had some dinosaur bones to excavate or something.
^^^

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 02:15 PM
The moon is the largest satellite in comparative size to its' planet. I don't know where you are getting small from.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 02:29 PM
The moon is the largest satellite in comparative size to its' planet. I don't know where you are getting small from.

I was comparing both the moon and earth in regards to the development of a magnetosphere based on size and material composition alone.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 02:34 PM
No, you weren't.

EAGLE EYE
05-30-2011, 02:40 PM
zK-30442RII

AstroNazis

CEITEDMOFO
05-30-2011, 02:54 PM
STYLEs DONT BOTHER CHATTIN WIT LOuIS QUEER DUDE IS JUST GONNA POST HOMOSEXUAL ANIME PICTURES DUDE IS DEFINITLY ASIAN LMAO
http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2009/01/Gran%20Torino%20Gif%202.gif

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 03:39 PM
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRO39n-oyG0t-jUBYoxRTUVot6qo6zZM4TtBbyGBzB_McdJez60KQ&t=1

ok so you proved there one mammal that ugly as fuck

lizards still have there entire phylum

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 03:41 PM
STYLEs DONT BOTHER CHATTIN WIT LOuIS QUEER DUDE IS JUST GONNA POST HOMOSEXUAL ANIME PICTURES DUDE IS DEFINITLY ASIAN LMAO
http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2009/01/Gran%20Torino%20Gif%202.gif

http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/media/images/RZA2.jpg

and i'm not Asian my little brother is

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 03:43 PM
you know you and your cohorts are now implying that crocodiles are older then the moon right?

yes there are some evidence supporting that

however mind you we have nothing but crust samples of the moon we need to did deeper

Edgar Erebus
05-30-2011, 03:51 PM
Dear Mr. Cypher...

axFMX4AfOpI


... ROCK ON

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 04:12 PM
right on

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 04:15 PM
yes there are some evidence supporting that

however mind you we have nothing but crust samples of the moon we need to did deeper

Drilling cores samples would be good but extremely dangerous! Plus, NASA can't afford to drill on the moon. It'd be to darn expensive.

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 04:18 PM
yeah its something to wait for when we have a moon base

Soul Controller
05-30-2011, 04:20 PM
i wish i could rep brock more

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:21 PM
okay now that everyone has put there two cents in about the moon...

recent (last week) findings show that the moon has literally oceans of H2O along with a large amount of volatiles. this amazing discovery has put the moons origin theory into severe jeopardy.

see, if the moon was created by an impact and coalesced debris then the volatiles and the water would have evaporated in the direct exposure of the sun. we would not be finding these two components in such large amounts if the moon was created by impact.

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:23 PM
oh and since 1969 the lunar atmosphere has thickened by 100 times. mostly CO2, Nitrogen oxygen and water vapor. why? who knows.

Prolifical ENG
05-30-2011, 04:26 PM
see, if the moon was created by an impact and coalesced debris then the volatiles and the water would have evaporated in the direct exposure of the sun. we would not be finding these two components in such large amounts if the moon was created by impact.

evaporate to where?

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:33 PM
AstroNazis

DeAfoiN5SDw
zkEUv6z20qo



Yammy version.
dX8t_n3oLIU

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:35 PM
evaporate to where?

space.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 04:41 PM
hahahahahahahaa

^^^you shoulda said it more dramatic like...SPACE!

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 04:46 PM
style your an idiot evaporated particles are forced to compression by gravity

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:48 PM
lol i was slippin, i should have posted this...

hdjL8WXjlGI

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 04:52 PM
style your an idiot evaporated particles are forced to compression by gravity


gravity in a debris field? think about what you are saying.

you have a hi temp cloud of debris. the excited molecules would be ejected
similar to the tail of a comet. possibly even trapped by earths gravity.

why don't comets build like a snowball as they eject gas and ice?

...yeah i thought so.

Prolifical ENG
05-30-2011, 04:55 PM
Well the moon does have an atmosphere, not even a drop in the bucket compared to Earth or Venus but a very small, mirco-dynamical one. Scientists always compare the moon to Mercury. The temperature variations close to the moon's surface as well as its V-escape (probably around 2km/s) may not necessarily make heavier gas particles a 'blow off' if the area has many days of constant sun like Mercury. Over billions of years it could be possible.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 04:56 PM
Oh snap yo, shit is gettin' real


Shit is gettin' real.










Shit is gettin' real nerdy up in hmyeah.

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 04:56 PM
if that wasn't the case all the stars would not be there and asteroids would fall apart

Dokuro
05-30-2011, 04:59 PM
gravity in a debris field? think about what you are saying.

you have a hi temp cloud of debris. the excited molecules would be ejected
similar to the tail of a comet. possibly even trapped by earths gravity.

why don't comets build like a snowball as they eject gas and ice?

...yeah i thought so.

propulsion is greater then the gravitational mass
if the object wasn't moving the debris would fall back on it self like it does when its stationary

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 05:03 PM
Here you fucking idiots

Water vapour has been detected by Chandrayaan-1 and found to vary with latitude, with a maximum at ~60–70 degrees; it is possibly generated from the sublimation of water ice in the regolith. These gases can either return into the regolith due to the Moon's gravity, or be lost to space: either through solar radiation pressure, or if they are ionised, by being swept away by the solar wind's magnetic field.

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 05:04 PM
water doesn't evaporate in space, it sublimates, like ice in your freezer.

IrOnMaN
05-30-2011, 05:05 PM
okay now that everyone has put there two cents in about the moon...

recent (last week) findings show that the moon has literally oceans of H2O along with a large amount of volatiles. this amazing discovery has put the moons origin theory into severe jeopardy.

see, if the moon was created by an impact and coalesced debris then the volatiles and the water would have evaporated in the direct exposure of the sun. we would not be finding these two components in such large amounts if the moon was created by impact.

Oceans of H2O? There were oceans of magma on the moon but not H2O.

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 05:07 PM
pro, we are talking pre-formation lunar mass (collision theory) not the moon as it stands today.

propulsion is greater then the gravitational mass
if the object wasn't moving the debris would fall back on it self like it does when its stationary

so you are going to suggest that an epic collision created a stationary cloud of debris?

...yeah keep diggin.

Prolifical ENG
05-30-2011, 05:20 PM
pro, we are talking pre-formation lunar mass (collision theory) not the moon as it stands today.

I know, I just dont think finding more water than thought before disproves the theory like the recent article suggests.

Uncle Steezo
05-30-2011, 05:21 PM
pro, your thoughts?

beautifulrock
05-30-2011, 05:23 PM
hahahaahahahaha OMG Style's sig

RADIOACTIVE MAN
06-01-2011, 03:00 PM
ok this thread was a great read