View Full Version : The Language of Math

LORD NOSE

08-26-2012, 03:20 PM

i looked at this for the first time and only saw the downward arrows, and said to myself "oh shit, i never seen that before". then i said to myself, "no big deal, there is usually a pattern in math"....but then i saw the arrows going upward and said "WTF!"

it's a fucked up, but liberating feeling knowing that you was stupid all this time - but it makes you wonder, how many more things are hidden in plain sight like this.

ADD On Math

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7334/52441810151205822593055.jpg

add the double digit answers and get 9

lmao - basic fuckin math - dam - i was a dumb fuck all this time ?

i ain't the only one though

LORD NOSE

09-22-2012, 01:53 PM

http://imageshack.us/a/img196/1310/40088049200660414418789.jpg

diggy

09-22-2012, 03:39 PM

[(2n + 6) / 2 ] - n = 3

KERZO

09-22-2012, 05:17 PM

i looked at this for the first time and only saw the downward arrows, and said to myself "oh shit, i never seen that before". then i said to myself, "no big deal, there is usually a pattern in math"....but then i saw the arrows going upward and said "WTF!"

it's a fucked up, but liberating feeling knowing that you was stupid all this time - but it makes you wonder, how many more things are hidden in plain sight like this.

ADD On Math

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7334/52441810151205822593055.jpg

add the double digit answers and get 9

lmao - basic fuckin math - dam - i was a dumb fuck all this time ?

i ain't the only one though

BWHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH you must have went to a fucking shitty school. We got taught this in 3rd-4th grade when we were 7 year old wtf?

I'm not even gonna get into how 1+1=3 cos that might just blow your mind!!!

LORD NOSE

09-22-2012, 05:37 PM

yeah don't

i'm too retarded to be shown these wonders

KERZO

09-22-2012, 06:07 PM

Here's something you may not have known, Optimus Prime in the transformers is quite a smart name cos Optimus is 7 characters long and 7 is a prime number.

http://i.imgur.com/UmpOi.gif

WOAH!

LORD NOSE

09-22-2012, 06:13 PM

i thought that 9x9 was 16 - when i found out that it was 13 i was angry

mr weinstein and mrs silvercroft lied to me

THEY LIED TO ME !

LORD_BEATJITZU

09-22-2012, 08:21 PM

PEACE,You should check out the books-"Number 9 The search for the sigma code" by Cecil Balmond and "The Enigma of Numbers" by Lance Storm,and "Is GOD a Mathematician" by Mario Livio.

tajeco

09-23-2012, 02:47 AM

I made a thread with what I thought was a great discovery of number patterns, but I guess kids learn it in middle school. I didn't.

http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=73460

ratty mayonnaise

09-24-2012, 06:37 AM

wont include teh Fibonacci sequence in this as its next level ish...

but some nice background info...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidentia_oppositorum#Coincidentia_oppositorum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_mathematics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieros_gamos

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox#Paradoxical_nature

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamathematics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_virtual_reality

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-philosophy#Relationship_with_philosophy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence#Can_a_machin e_be_original_or_creative.3F

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_mathematics#The_epistemic_argument_a gainst_realism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_outside_the_box

John Nash

10-03-2012, 03:07 PM

i already knew this but when i saw the OP i wondered why that was and its actually pretty obvious and can b proven simply.

if u write all ur numbers in base x (OP says x=10 which is ofc the most commonly used base) and then use timetables of x-1 (OP says x-1=9) and then write out all the timetables u get

1(x-1)=(x-1) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 0 and the digit on the right will b (x-1)

2(x-1)=(2x-2) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 1 and the digit on the right will b (x-2)

3(x-1)=(3x-3) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 2 and the digit on the right will b (x-3)

4(x-1)=(4x-4) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 3 and the digit on the right will b (x-4)

and this can b repeated for all two digit numbers when multiplying a number which is 1 under the base.

so eg if we skip to 7 times 9. so here were saying x=10 and (x-1)=9

and so 7 times 9=7(x-1)=7x-7 which means the left hand digit is 6 and the right hand digit is x-7

so we know the left hand digit is 6 and we now need to find out the right hand digit. right hand digit is (x-7) and substituting (x=10) gives us (10-7) which is 3. so the right hand digit is 3. putting these 2 facts together gives us the number 63.

therefore 7 times 9=63

John Nash

10-03-2012, 03:13 PM

actually looking back on what i was saying its all quite a confusing format. i'll try a different format of |first digit||second digit|

so if we do it again

1(x-1)=x-1=|0||x-1|

2(x-1)=2x-2=|1||x-2|

3(x-1)=3x-3=|2||x-3|

4(x-1)=4x-4=|3||x-4|

etc

vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.