View Full Version : 50%

da kid toney
05-14-2006, 11:56 AM
yep. the rich people only need to give away 50% of their property and money and the world would be saved in within 15years

05-14-2006, 12:56 PM

da kid toney
05-14-2006, 05:08 PM
put the cash together first
then make plans and organise- build upon the oldest religious scripts found on planet earth. ...

05-14-2006, 06:12 PM
i am not at all suprised by this statement.

Frontal Lobotomy
05-14-2006, 06:52 PM
If that sort of cash was raised, people would inevitably line their pockets while 'overseeing' such plans come into action.

da kid toney
05-14-2006, 06:58 PM
yes. there gots to be a good leaderhttp://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j28/Kelgra/Cavebob.jpg

05-14-2006, 08:12 PM
communism...its where its at.

05-14-2006, 08:15 PM
im gon keep this thread open

this can be the general chat section in KTL

dont tell the other moderators or else i might get blacklisted

05-14-2006, 08:32 PM
communism...its where its at.

i'd say what's being alluded to in this thread is more anarchy.

da kid toney
05-15-2006, 09:48 AM
no. itīs a fair system... like theone with the pope, but this leader donīt take money for "his vatican". instead he will reinvest every cent coming in... easy

05-15-2006, 09:55 AM
reinvest in what?

walmart stocks?

da kid toney
05-15-2006, 11:28 AM
hahaha.. no. give back to the streets. to the kids and youths.
build buildings in all the cities, where the young ones can go to and feel like home.

basicially. itīs not enough to take the money from the rich. famous musicians, singers and rappers must be involved... same story, different year:=)

05-15-2006, 02:23 PM
Capitalism and most modern economic systems cannot exist without poor people. If they were to take 50% of rich peoples money and spread it evenly across the world, reconstructing buildings and getting rid of ghettos and poor people, our economy would collapse and there will be a depression.

Upper Class
Lower Class

The 2 coincide hand and hand, it's the only way we can live in a world where we place monetary value on things. If there isn't a need for money to acquire whatever you need than money is no longer as valuable as it was.

Money itself is the problem, not the lack of or excess of it.