PDA

View Full Version : Hazards of Microwave Cooking


Wamukota X
07-31-2006, 02:46 PM
MICROWAVE COOKING



is Killing You!






Microwave cooking is one of themost important causes of ill health. It is certainly one of the most ignored. There was a lawsuit in 1991 in Oklahoma. A woman named Norma Levitt had hip surgery, but was killed by a simple blood transfusion when a nurse "warmed the blood for the transfusion in a microwave oven!"

Logic suggests that if heating is all there is to microwave cooking, then it doesn't matter how something is heated. Blood for transfusions is routinely warmed, but not in microwave ovens. Does it not therefore follow that microwaving cooking does something quite different?
A little evidence of the harm caused by microwaving cooking was given by the University of Minnesota in a radio announcement:
"Microwaves ... are not recommended for heating a baby's bottle. The bottle may seem cool to the touch, but the liquid inside may become extremely hot and could burn the baby's mouth and throat... Heating the bottle in a microwave can cause slight changes in the milk.

In infant formulas, there may be a loss of some vitamins. In expressed breast milk, some protective properties may be destroyed.... Warming a bottle by holding it under tap water or by setting it in a bowl of warm water, then testing it on your wrist before feeding, may take a few minutes longer, but it is much safer".
There have been very few scientific studies done on the effect of eating food microwaved food. This is rather surprising when you think about the fact that microwaves have been with us for only a few decades - and that in that time the incidence of many diseases has continued to increase.
Two researchers, Blanc and Hertel, confirmed that microwave cooking significantly changes food nutrients. Hertel previously worked as a food scientist for several years with one of the major Swiss food companies. He was fired from his job for questioning procedures in processing food because they denatured it. He got together with Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Biochemistry and the University Institute for Biochemistry.

They studied the effect that microwaved food had on eight individuals, by taking blood samples immediately after eating. They found that after eating microwaved food, haemoglobin levels decreased. "These results show anaemic tendencies. The situation became even more pronounced during the second month of the study".
Who knows what results they would have found if they had studied people who ate microwaved food for a year or more? The violent change that microwaving causes to the food molecules forms new life forms called radiolytic compounds. These are mutations that are unknown in the natural world. Ordinary cooking also causes the formation of some radiolytic compounds (which is no doubt one reason why it is better to eat plenty of raw food), but microwaving cooking causes a much greater number. This then causes deterioration in your blood and immune system.

In addition, they found that the number of leucocytes increases after eating microwaved food - something which haematologists take very seriously, because this is often a sign of highly harmful effects, such as poisoning. Also, after eating microwaved food, cholesterol levels increased. Hertel said "Common scientific belief states that cholesterol values usually alter slowly over longer periods of time. In this study, the markers increased rapidly after the consumption of the microwaved vegetables." He believes his study tends to confirm new scientific data that suggest cholesterol may rapidly increase in the blood secondary to acute stress. "Also," he added, "blood cholesterol levels are less influenced by cholesterol content of food than by stress factors. Such stress-causing factors can apparently consist of foods which contain virtually no cholesterol - the microwaved vegetables."

The results were published in "Search for Health" in the Spring of 1992. How was this research greeted? A powerful trade organisation, the Swiss Association of Dealers for Electroapparatuses for Households and Industry somehow made the President of the Court of Seftigen issue a `gag order'. Hertel and Blanc were told that if they published their findings they would face hefty fines or up to one year in prison. In response to this, Blanc recanted his findings. Hertel, on the other hand, went on a lecture tour and demanded a jury trial. FINALLY, in 1998 the Court `Gag Order' was removed.

In a judgment delivered at Strasbourg on 25 August 1998 in the case of Hertel v. Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Hertel's rights in the 1993 decision. The Court decided that the `gag order' prohibiting him form declaring that microwaved food is dangerous to health was contrary to the right to freedom of _expression. In addition, Switzerland was sentenced to pay compensation of F40,000.


In Summary: Blanc and Hertel found that eating microwaved food:

Increases cholesterol
Increases white blood cell numbers
Decreases red blood cell numbers
Causes production of radiolytic compounds (compounds unknown in nature)RUSSIANS BAN MICROWAVE OVENS
After the World War II, the Russians also experimented with microwave ovens. From 1957 up to recently, their research has been carried out mainly at the Institute of Radio Technology at Klinsk, Byelorussia. According to US researcher William Kopp, who gathered much of the results of Russian and German research - and was apparently prosecuted for doing so (J. Nat. Sci, 1998; 1:42-3) - the following effects were observed by Russian forensic teams:

1. Heating prepared meats in a microwave sufficiently for human consumption created:
* d-Nitrosodiethanolamine (a well-known cancer-causing agent)
* Destabilization of active protein biomolecular compounds
* Creation of a binding effect to radioactivity in the atmosphere
* Creation of cancer-causing agents within protein-hydrosylate compounds in milk and cereal grains;

2. Microwave emissions also caused alteration in the catabolic (breakdown) behavior of glucoside - and galactoside - elements within frozen fruits when thawed in this way;

3. Microwaves altered catabolic behavior of plant-alkaloids when raw, cooked or frozen vegetables were exposed for even very short periods;

4. Cancer-causing free radicals were formed within certain trace-mineral molecular formations in plant substances, especially in raw root vegetables;

5. Ingestion of micro-waved foods caused a higher percentage of cancerous cells in blood;

6. Due to chemical alterations within food substances, malfunctions occurred in the lymphatic system, causing degeneration of the immune system=s capacity to protect itself against cancerous growth;

7. The unstable catabolism of micro-waved foods altered their elemental food substances, leading to disorders in the digestive system;

8. Those ingesting micro-waved foods showed a statistically higher incidence of stomach and intestinal cancers, plus a general degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues with a gradual breakdown of digestive and excretory system function;

9. Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritional value of all foods studied, particularly:
* A decrease in the bioavailability of B-complex vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotrophics
* Destruction of the nutritional value of nucleoproteins in meats
* Lowering of the metabolic activity of alkaloids, glucosides, galactosides and nitrilosides (all basic plant substances in fruits and vegetables)
* Marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.
As a result microwave ovens were banned in Russia in 1976; the ban was lifted after Perestroika.

CherChezLaMarauder
07-31-2006, 02:49 PM
I Heard This Is All Just A Myth, I Don't Know

Wamukota X
07-31-2006, 02:54 PM
I suggest doing a personal study on the exact mechanism of how a microwave works. Then you can know for sure whether it is a myth or not.

CherChezLaMarauder
07-31-2006, 03:02 PM
How About Cell Phones, Are They Hazardous Too?

Wamukota X
07-31-2006, 03:05 PM
Let's discuss cell phones in another thread.

tacle
07-31-2006, 03:09 PM
I don't listen to shit like that.

Wamukota X
07-31-2006, 03:10 PM
Take it or Leave it.

Strange Fruit
07-31-2006, 03:11 PM
lol it's funny,
nothing's good for anyone anymore.

actually, cellphones fall under this category too.

radioactivity and such,,,

Blazing Fire
08-01-2006, 02:39 AM
i personally can't stand radiation ovens

i go into panic mode when i hear the distinctive close of a microwave door - knowing im about to get hit by mad microwaves...

it definitely scrambles your energy...

also ruins the food, might make you sick if you eat the food...

cell phones also use radiation...

for instance - the other day i felt a sudden pain in my abdomen - yup i had a incoming cell phone call

put the phone near your monitor - notice it flickers the screen for a few seconds right before the phone starts ringing... if it fucks with that energy it fucks with your energy...

you notice this stuff when you get very high - as in high energy level... often achieved through use of herb...

it becomes clear what brings u down...

the other day i talked to someone on a payphone and it felt great to be able to really relax and enjoy the conversation - something that i find very difficult to do with microwave phones

if microwaves are dangerous, why are they legal?

dumb people are easier to control - also why herb is illegal

supremecharma
08-01-2006, 03:33 AM
of course its fuckin hazardous. derrr. people use them cos they havent got the time to wait around for the oven to warm up and shit. personally i'd do the latter. word

V4D3R
08-01-2006, 03:41 AM
I have never owned a cell phone except for this one a couple of months ago for a month. Radiation phones and ovens seem to be some NWO agenda bs to kill 85% of us.

supremecharma
08-01-2006, 03:53 AM
what makes me laugh is these people with the ones permantly attached to the sides of their heads...............their brains must be mush!!!!

Dirty Knowledge
08-01-2006, 04:24 AM
You gotta be joking me.. this has to be told to people? Lol.

GuardianOne
08-01-2006, 04:51 AM
I used to have a Handsfree headset for my Nokia 9500i before it got stolen 2 weeks ago. So currently iam running around with a Nokia 3100 (games are cool though)

anyway....

Clipping a tiny ferrite bead onto hands-free mobile phone kits can reduce a cell phone user's exposure to radiation to virtually zero. While using a hands-free device has been found to reduce radiation from cell phones, emissions can still travel up the headset wire and into the head.
The magnetic beads, which cost only a few pennies and measure less than 1cm in diameter, absorb these emissions and stop the radiation from being absorbed by the head. The hands-free kits have two currents, one that intentionally travels inside the wire and one that unintentionally travels outside the wire. It is the "unintentional" current that is blocked by the ferrite bead.
Evidence suggests the beads are most effective when placed around chest level, just below the microphone on a typical hands-free device.
Researchers said they'd like to see the mobile phone industry include the ferrite beads, which are already widely used to stop data interference in computers, in their hands-free devices "as standard." However, it could be quite some time before the cell phone industry and manufacturers incorporate this essential solution making cell phones a safer product.
But you don't have to wait; you can start protecting yourself from dangerous cell phone radiation today. If you use a cell phone at all, I cannot urge you strongly enough to consider ordering this important protection device.
BBC News> January 25, 2005
Handsets: Mobile phone handsets are low-powered RF transmitters, emitting maximum powers in the range of 0.2 to 0.6 watts. Other types of hand held transmitter, such as "walkie talkies", may emit 10 watts or more. The RF field strength (and hence RF exposure to a user) falls off rapidly with distance from the handset. Therefore, the RF exposure to a user of a mobile phone located 10s of centimetres from the head (using a "hands free" appliance) is far lower than to a user who places the headset against the head. RF exposures to nearby people are very low.
(WHO June 2000) Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile telephones and their base stations
EMR exposure can cause irreparable harm to you and your loved ones. If you use your cell phone more than 15 minutes a week, it can shorten your life, even if you are healthy. No one is immune to the ravaging health effects of this radiation. Why expose yourself to dangerous radiation when such an effective solution is so easily available?

Peace

Os3y3ris
08-01-2006, 05:39 AM
The initial logic is flawed. I stopped reading after that. Consider, someone dies after recieving microwaved blood. Was that all that happened with that blood? No, there were other factors not covered in that little analysis. Then consider the state of a person recieving blood. THEY ARE ALREADY DYING. Blaming it on the blood is a stretch. Blaming it on the microwaving procedure, which may or may not be common (he doesnt site anything there), is just insane as he's not done, or at least has not presented the supporting research in that anectdote.

Wu-tang Fan
08-01-2006, 05:49 AM
Damn it, all the so called "African Americans" on this site seem to make up such long winded posts.

supremecharma
08-01-2006, 05:51 AM
its all that knowledge man!! lol

Frontal Lobotomy
08-01-2006, 06:19 AM
To be fair, he was spot on with regard to microwaves, they are lethal. They emit an awful lot of microwave radiation while nuking the food. Its just that a lot of people have becme so lazy that they would rather deny that such things like mobile phones, microwaves, TVs and all the rest of it do emit dangerous shit, just as long as it keeps making life 'easier'
Nice post, Wamukota

Wamukota X
08-01-2006, 06:34 AM
Damn it, all the so called "African Americans" on this site seem to make up such long winded posts.


You are free to turn your computer off at any time.

supremecharma
08-01-2006, 06:43 AM
thats better^^^!!!!

Wamukota X
08-01-2006, 07:11 AM
The initial logic is flawed. I stopped reading after that. Consider, someone dies after recieving microwaved blood. Was that all that happened with that blood? No, there were other factors not covered in that little analysis. Then consider the state of a person recieving blood. THEY ARE ALREADY DYING. Blaming it on the blood is a stretch. Blaming it on the microwaving procedure, which may or may not be common (he doesnt site anything there), is just insane as he's not done, or at least has not presented the supporting research in that anectdote.


I did not do the research so it may be flawed....no, but seriously whether it is flawed or not these are definitely serious accusations.

Wamukota X
08-02-2006, 09:41 AM
Dr. Lita Lee of Hawaii reported in the December 9, 1989 Lancet (International journal of medical science and practice):

"Microwaving baby formulas converted certain trans-amino acids into their synthetic cis-isomers. Synthetic isomers, whether cis-amino acids or trans-fatty acids, are not biologically active.
Further, one of the amino acids, L-proline, was converted to its d-isomer, which is known to be neurotoxic (poisonous to the nervous system) and nephrotoxic (poisonous to the kidneys). It's bad enough that many babies are not nursed, but now they are given fake milk (baby formula) made even more toxic via microwaving."

Longbongcilvaringz
08-03-2006, 08:27 AM
lol at this thread.

don't use a microwave then, there is no proof they do any harm.

SubtleEnergies
08-04-2006, 01:22 AM
Yep, this is why my house hasn't had one in about 10 years.

supremecharma
08-04-2006, 01:25 AM
and i suppose u donthave a cellfone either??

Visionz
08-04-2006, 01:31 AM
Do you think there is a difference in the outcome between cooking vs reheating food in the microwave? I don't ever cook with it, that shit comes out nasty. But they are good for warming food up.

GuardianOne
08-04-2006, 03:49 AM
Do you think there is a difference in the outcome between cooking vs reheating food in the microwave? I don't ever cook with it, that shit comes out nasty. But they are good for warming food up.

That does raise a question.
There should be a difference, but to prove this needs more information on the subject.
Although there term "using a little bit of a bad thing will still hurt" bring a thought.

For one though, people just freeze their fresh bread and after two days they just heat in the microwave....

Peace