PDA

View Full Version : do you believe in the da vinci code


Its Big Lu baby
08-08-2006, 12:44 AM
jesus had a wife
they had a son
the royal bloodline still lives till this day
there is a priory of sion
the priory of sion protect the bloodline
leonardo portrayed peters envy of mary magdalenne in the painting the last supper where she is sat next to jesus and he is holding a knife and making a slice neck gesture at her
ect.ect.

they say the priory of sion was a "hoax" but others say that it was said to be a hoax to hide its true identy ect. ect.
a lot of ppl refuse to bleieve any of this
but it is infact
POSSIBLE

what do yall think?

btw i believe this shit

peace

supremecharma
08-08-2006, 01:38 AM
ahhhhh big lu - u just finished reading the da vinci code...... good man!!!!

yeah i believe man......

what about the crazy ass monk with white hair - cant remeber his name now, sirus or something, proper wierdo.....!!! and i love the way that fucker killed his butler with the peanut dust - Quality!!!!

Robert
08-08-2006, 01:48 AM
Possible.....but who knows

CHRONZ
08-08-2006, 01:49 AM
The Da Vinci Code is ill yo !
it def get some thoughts going in my head fo sho !

The Wizzard
08-08-2006, 02:12 AM
it's all bullshit, he may of had a wife and a son, but the specifics presented in the novel are all bullshit, sorry to say. My information comes from a documentary i watched about it on the Discovery Times Chanel., so they may be lying to me but thats who i'm beleiveing currently.

snapple
08-08-2006, 02:26 AM
not a chance, i dont interpret the bible as fact anyway....and it doesnt make a different to me weather it is fact or fiction

The Wizzard
08-08-2006, 02:50 AM
^no but jesus wa a real person, god or not, i am almost certain, so it would be interesting if he did have genes swimming round today.

ShaDynasty
08-08-2006, 02:55 AM
if jesus existed, he was a nutcase because god sure as hell DONT exist
jesus probably got lots of AIDS infested chickenhead action back in the holey land
it wouldnt surpride me if everyone had a bit of jesus in them
so what is the relevance of da vinci, is leonardo posed to be related? or mona lisa?

mashqauck
08-08-2006, 03:04 AM
I don't think a painter can determine Jesus' life with his own painting. Did Picasso or any other painter have any other fame like this with one of their paintings? No! but some were around the same time but they didn't say whether God had sex or not. I think everything is real though

$inista
08-08-2006, 11:28 AM
dont know bout the story but it could be true i think he was a man & he had a wife & maybe even a seed
http://gim.gupshup.org/gal/H/da-vinci-last-supper-copy19605_5815974.JPG

Kong
08-08-2006, 12:06 PM
I don't believe, I don't dis-believe, I don't think you can believe 1 view of it.

CashRules
08-08-2006, 12:29 PM
Its bullshit! silly conspiracy theorists thinkin they smarter than everyone else, Besides being logically and historically flawed, The Da Vinci Code is filled with more minor, but no less risible, errors. Here are a few:

One of Brown's scholars says, "As the prophesied Messiah, Jesus toppled kings, inspired millions and founded new philosophies." We'd like to meet those toppled kings.

The Emperor Constantine did not make Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire in A.D. 325. It happened under Theodosius 50 years later.

Gothic architecture was not "masterminded" by the Knights Templar, a medieval military order that had nothing to do with the construction of Gothic cathedrals.

The Church did not burn 5 million witches during the Middle Ages. During the period 1400-1800, an estimated 30,000-50,000 people accused of witchcraft (20 percent of whom were men) were executed by Catholic and Protestant institutions and governments.

DONT BELIEVE THE HYPE!

snapple
08-08-2006, 12:39 PM
^no but jesus wa a real person, god or not, i am almost certain, so it would be interesting if he did have genes swimming round today.


"i am almost certain" you will never ever know. and no internet forum is gonna ever give you the real answer, it's all twisted bullshit now that was lifetimes ahead of us it has no relivence to your life and doesn't make a damn difference if he was real or not. and so what if jesus was real and someone had jesus blood? what if that person was a convicted killer doing time...would he be set free because hes the holy grail now?

tekunique
08-08-2006, 12:42 PM
its 'FUN' to believe it.

nuff said.

Kong
08-08-2006, 12:58 PM
beliefs restrict you.

that aint fun.

Greek Gheynician Anal Tradition
08-08-2006, 01:22 PM
Bullshit..

Kong
08-08-2006, 01:30 PM
I don't have many beliefs now, not all spiritual beliefs are restricting but most religious beliefs are.

CHRONZ
08-08-2006, 01:34 PM
no sex befo we get married ! DAAANM

Kong
08-08-2006, 01:37 PM
don't get a tattoo

don't shave the sideburns

don't eat pork

blah

blah

blah

Its Big Lu baby
08-08-2006, 03:19 PM
ahhhhh big lu - u just finished reading the da vinci code...... good man!!!!

yeah i believe man......

what about the crazy ass monk with white hair - cant remeber his name now, sirus or something, proper wierdo.....!!! and i love the way that fucker killed his butler with the peanut dust - Quality!!!!

yea i done finished reading it awhile ago it was dope man. but it does get u thinking. even tho people say that its not true for whatever reason. those reasons can be false to. im just saying its a possibilty. and yea its a dope fucking read. how they figure out the codes n shit... the movie was iight but nothing like the book
I don't think a painter can determine Jesus' life with his own painting. Did Picasso or any other painter have any other fame like this with one of their paintings? No! but some were around the same time but they didn't say whether God had sex or not. I think everything is real though

the painter was known to be in the priory of sion which had proof of jesus having a wife ect. ect. ect. and he portrayed it in his pic. im not saying he can determine his life. but he put out hints in his paintings.

Its Big Lu baby
08-08-2006, 03:20 PM
btw what the fuck is up with the site?
all the way to the left n shit. weird

tekunique
08-08-2006, 03:25 PM
yea i done finished reading it awhile ago it was dope man. but it does get u thinking. even tho people say that its not true for whatever reason. those reasons can be false to. im just saying its a possibilty. and yea its a dope fucking read. how they figure out the codes n shit... the movie was iight but nothing like the book


the painter was known to be in the priory of sion which had proof of jesus having a wife ect. ect. ect. and he portrayed it in his pic. im not saying he can determine his life. but he put out hints in his paintings.
have you read
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1416524797.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

its better.

Its Big Lu baby
08-08-2006, 03:31 PM
have you read
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1416524797.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

its better.

nah man! i heard it was better
but i havent had time to cop that

tekunique
08-08-2006, 03:36 PM
nah man! i heard it was better
but i havent had time to cop that
check that out man its ill.. it came out before the da vinci code and is the first book with robert langdon.

The Wizzard
08-08-2006, 03:42 PM
"i am almost certain" you will never ever know. and no internet forum is gonna ever give you the real answer, it's all twisted bullshit now that was lifetimes ahead of us it has no relivence to your life and doesn't make a damn difference if he was real or not. and so what if jesus was real and someone had jesus blood? what if that person was a convicted killer doing time...would he be set free because hes the holy grail now?

I beleive that jesus was a real person, but I do not think he was any son of God. what i beleive is that he was just an ill teacher who knew some real shit and had deep understandings. And it really is no big deal, but you can't hate on someone for being curious, that shit would just be interesting, not life changing or anything like that, but cool, somthin to read about or watch on tv.

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:22 AM
ppl who believe the davinci code are idiots

the mary magdoline shit in the painting has been proved false just like everything else in the book.

the person in the painting is JOHN not mary. in many paintings, etc.... john is protrayed with womanly features because he was the youngest disciple.

lol its funny you guys will believe a fiction book blindly just cause it goes against the bible yet u criticize christians for what you accuse of the same thing.

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:25 AM
ppl who believe the davinci code are idiots

the mary magdoline shit in the painting has been proved false just like everything else in the book.

the person in the painting is JOHN not mary. in many paintings, etc.... john is protrayed with womanly features because he was the youngest disciple.

lol its funny you guys will believe a fiction book blindly just cause it goes against the bible yet u criticize christians for what you accuse of the same thing.


u gonna show us this proof???? :o

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:26 AM
so what blood line of jesus big deal.


i cannot believe someone would say this. how foolish.

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:35 AM
u gonna show us this proof???? :o



you wanna see proof when davinci code shows you no proof? pretty hypocritial but look at a picture of john right here....

http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/images/exhibitions/month/H475/H475_john.jpg

notice he looks like a woman

again john looks younger in this picture as well
http://www.stjohnsabq.org/IncidGraph/!WinFinal/!Full/StJohn.jpg

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:37 AM
oh and plus there are only 12 ppl besides jesus in the picture of the last supper. why would leonardo davinci leave out john one of the most important disciples if it was mary. it doesnt make sense. do the research

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:38 AM
http://atheism.about.com/library/graphics/John01-s.jpg

i found this pic lol there is nothing else that needs to be said

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:41 AM
no. looks like a man to me. not like the last supper where the person to the left of Jesus looks BLATENTLY like a Woman.

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:42 AM
ok that last one you posted does look like a woman. one.

The Wizzard
08-09-2006, 01:44 AM
theres actually another picture DaVinci did of John that makes him look very feminine, i'll see if i can find it

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:46 AM
ur trying to hard to make something out of nothing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Simon_ushakov_last_supper_1685.jpg

The Wizzard
08-09-2006, 01:46 AM
you be the judge, I think it looks pretty feminine:

http://www.mystudios.com/art/italian/davinci/davinci-st-john-1513.jpg

the website it was found at was in case you thinkin i'm lyin:
http://www.mystudios.com/art/italian/davinci/davinci-st-john-1513.html

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:49 AM
you be the judge, I think it looks pretty feminine:

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9gnMiFwdtlEvCAAsIijzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NDgyNWN 0BHNlYwNwcm9m/SIG=12pg4f9r8/EXP=1155188720/**http%3a//www.mystudios.com/art/italian/davinci/davinci-st-john-1513.jpg

the website it was found at was in case you thinkin i'm lyin:
http://www.mystudios.com/art/italian/davinci/davinci-st-john-1513.html



exactly

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:51 AM
ur trying to hard to make something out of nothing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Simon_ushakov_last_supper_1685.jpg


i know but u see the one 'snuggling' up to jesus, well he/she hasnt got a beard........ all the rest have........seemms a bit wierd that he's cuddling him too.........but dont worry bone c......you got your opinions.....we got ours.......peace man

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:54 AM
its not opinions its facts

plus none of these painters were there when the last supper happened

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:55 AM
and u gotta remember john is said to be The beloved disciple of Christ and that is the way the painter painted it

supremecharma
08-09-2006, 01:56 AM
nor were you homie!

Bone Collecta
08-09-2006, 01:59 AM
never said i was