PDA

View Full Version : Murder was the Case when the Crowd Break Fool


june181972
08-11-2006, 06:06 PM
I love Colin Ferguson just as much as the masses of white America love General Swartzkoff, General Wes Morlan, General Patton, General MacArthur, and Eisenhower. America Awards her killers, and they get ribbons and stripes and bars.

Dr. Khalid Muhammad

Colin Ferguson killed 6 white people and injured 19 other white people on December 7, 1993. He randomly shot a gun on a Long Island Rail Road train in Nassau County, New York.

Reginald and Jonathan Carr:
http://www.wichita-massacre.com/

The Death Angels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_murders

None of this is meant to give honor or praise to these murderers.
There is no greater evil than to murder anyone.

However, I am willing to bet that many of you that choose to read this post have not heard of some or all of these criminals and their crimes.

And I know that none of you have ever seen a made for T.V. movie about them either.
Because unlike Jeffery Dauhmer and John Wayne Gacy, two infamous white serial killers, no movie was ever made to visually document their vicious exploits.

Why is it that all forms of American media suppress the stories of black serial killers who murder whites? While white serial killers often go down in notorious, sometimes "occultish," infamy.
(Charles Manson?)

Once again, absolutely no props to any of these Devils.

JASPER
08-11-2006, 06:27 PM
Is this about race again.. jeez..

Gawd
08-11-2006, 06:49 PM
white ppl? or just ppl? I mean they were just ppl........who cares what their skin color was. what he did was wrong no matter what race they were.

june181972
08-11-2006, 09:31 PM
Is this about race again.. jeez..

Its about the role that the media plays in the public's perception of race.

june181972
08-11-2006, 09:37 PM
white ppl? or just ppl? I mean they were just ppl........who cares what their skin color was. what he did was wrong no matter what race they were.

I would never argue this point.

It is not me, but the media that seems to care what the skin color of the victims and the victimizers are.

JASPER
08-11-2006, 09:40 PM
So basically we're going to talk about races again...

I really don't know what to do with this topic. Maybe you can reform your question a little differently.

june181972
08-11-2006, 09:53 PM
So basically we're going to talk about races again...

I really don't know what to do with this topic. Maybe you can reform your question a little differently.

I am assuming that people exposed to various forms of media from the U.S.A. are much more likely to know who Manson, Dahmer and Gacy are, than their black "counterparts."

And this is not an unfounded assumption. One group gets more coverage in televised, print and electronic media.

Why do you think this is so?

JASPER
08-11-2006, 10:08 PM
I think the news just covers what is happening. Maybe it's because, Damher, Gacy and Manson, didn't simply shoot their victims... Gacy, brutally murdered 33 boys some of which he raped. More interesting news story than a black guy shooting whites. It's more shocking.
Manson, where to start.... I don't know, more interesting again and more shock value.
Dahmer, serial killer, rapist, necrophiliac, cannibal... more horrific again.

I think it hasn't got much to do with race or anything. I mean look at the coverage OJ Simpson got...

"The zebra killings were the work of an extremist sect of the black nationalist group, the Nation of Islam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam). According to their beliefs, the white race was created by a black mad scientist named Yakub (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakub), who, some say, wanted a race of inferiors to rule over. Furthermore, the Death Angels believed that they could earn "points" towards Paradise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise) when they died if they killed as many whites as possible. In their racist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racist) teachings, they saw the whites not as human beings, but as "blue-eyed devils" or "grafted snakes"."

I found that part very interesting. Sounds like some people who post in this very forum.

june181972
08-13-2006, 10:11 AM
I think the news just covers what is happening. Maybe it's because, Damher, Gacy and Manson, didn't simply shoot their victims... Gacy, brutally murdered 33 boys some of which he raped. More interesting news story than a black guy shooting whites. It's more shocking.
Manson, where to start.... I don't know, more interesting again and more shock value.
Dahmer, serial killer, rapist, necrophiliac, cannibal... more horrific again.

I think it hasn't got much to do with race or anything. I mean look at the coverage OJ Simpson got...

"The zebra killings were the work of an extremist sect of the black nationalist group, the Nation of Islam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam). According to their beliefs, the white race was created by a black mad scientist named Yakub (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakub), who, some say, wanted a race of inferiors to rule over. Furthermore, the Death Angels believed that they could earn "points" towards Paradise (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise) when they died if they killed as many whites as possible. In their racist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racist) teachings, they saw the whites not as human beings, but as "blue-eyed devils" or "grafted snakes"."

I found that part very interesting. Sounds like some people who post in this very forum.

Interesting point.
All of those extra grotesque and bizarre and unnatural acts does make the story more "shocking."
But does more shocking=more news worthy? The Death Angels are suspected of over 70 murders.
What does it say about the media when the more vile acts get made into made for T.V. movies?

I think it hasn't got much to do with race or anything. I mean look at the coverage OJ Simpson got...
Aside from the fact that O.J. Simpson was a celebrity, the massive media coverage for that trial was based on race. Do you remember when they annouced the verdict? The media had cameras in "all black" locations and taped the majority of them cheering for not guilty. At "all white" locations it was looks of disgust and outrage. Do you remember all of the polls that the media took? "Blacks think this" about the trial, and "whites think that."

The O.J. Simpson trial proved that "it" is always about race. No matter what the "it" is.

I'm sensitive to the pain and suffering of the loss of life on that train. But I'm one of the rebellious slaves, and so when black people stand up out of pain and suffering and frustration, I understand after five hundred years.
Dr. Khalid Muhammad
Violence by blacks perpatrated against whites is historically an anomaly. To me this is somewhat "shocking." U.S.A. has done a "masterful" job of keeping the niggers in check. And I think the media has been one of the most effective tools.

Point taken about the shock value
But there is a reason why I never learned about Nat Turner in school.

Punch
08-13-2006, 01:42 PM
I think the reason why there's a movie about Dahmer is because he ate people.
And planned to build a throne out of bones.
And had a head in his freezer

Just saying...

JASPER
08-13-2006, 05:03 PM
Interesting point.
All of those extra grotesque and bizarre and unnatural acts does make the story more "shocking."
But does more shocking=more news worthy? The Death Angels are suspected of over 70 murders.
What does it say about the media when the more vile acts get made into made for T.V. movies?

I'll ignore the OJ Simpson stuff, because I don't know the finer details of it, but you see... shock value = more viewers = higher ratings = more money.

The Wizzard
08-14-2006, 02:49 AM
Man this shit just tears apart instead of bringing together, it's good on the knowledge, like I love to get educated on anything I can right, but when you bring it up in a public forum it's just tearing shit apart, even if you are trying to show theres black people just as crazy as whites, i'm sure you could have found a quote and article about people of all ethnicities doing somthing charitable.

june181972
08-14-2006, 06:00 PM
but you see... shock value = more viewers = higher ratings = more money.

If this is so, then this statement loses a lot of its validity--->

I think the news just covers what is happening

Does the media "cover what is happening" as its absolute purpose?

Or are there other motivating factors?

june181972
08-14-2006, 06:24 PM
Man this shit just tears apart instead of bringing together, ...but when you bring it up in a public forum it's just tearing shit apart, even if you are trying to show theres black people just as crazy as whites, i'm sure you could have found a quote and article about people of all ethnicities doing somthing charitable.

I think it is obvious things are already well torn apart beyond repair

I am definitely not some serial killer enthusiast
I shun evil on all levels

I just found the disparity in the general knowledge of these incidents to be interesting
And wondered if there was any reason for it

people do good
people do evil
this thread was about the evil people

june181972
08-14-2006, 06:28 PM
u know why the cue ball is white and it has to sink the black ball? its a conspiracy against the blackman!

Many truths are spoken in jest!

JASPER
08-14-2006, 06:33 PM
If this is so, then this statement loses a lot of its validity--->



Does the media "cover what is happening" as its absolute purpose?

Or are there other motivating factors?They just cover it, but give more shocking news more attention. Sometimes the most important news of the day is who Paris Hilton shared a bad case of herpes with.

It all depends on what channel you watch, but in general, the media wants viewers and money.