TSA
04-17-2008, 09:21 AM
I hear people talk about women's relationship to the media in a perastic, self serving way. The media uses the image of women for self serving gain with little to no regard of the catastrophic impact left on the human oranges it peels and eventually disgards once all the desirable contents are full exploited and digested.
for instance the career span of models, singers actresses, and so forth only being healthy during their early twenties with the immensely talented only having the physical provisions and ratio to continue the trek from hollywood passed the tinsel town grey age of 27.
Otherwise a career is based on superficial looks and superficial looks alone. One that foundation is gone the roof top of intellect and personality and walls of talent are useless to society and the industry it's self.
In result we hear about an impact on society that can only be described in the same manner as nuces impact to a suicide.
Women are thus under the trap of the media, there image isn't good enough, not because they're ugly, but because they're not cosmetic.
They're too fat, their boobs are too small, they need to white it up, too short, and so forth...
but my question is, does this start with the media, or the women? Not so much "who's to blame", but a which came first the Cat or the Catwalk, when it comes to this mentality.
for instance, i'm with a girl whose obsessive use of make up if fully turning me off regardless of her anusly tight vagina and it's oddless glory.
she just cakes it on and cakes it on and cakes it on till she's 3 shades lighter and looks like a tan japanesse geisha.
women have been distorting the feminine image well before the media or contemporary pressure came along. make up, misleading bras, "doing their hair", tanning, skin bleaching, weight watching, holding their stomachs in and so forth
till the point that the REAL LIVE WOMEN is hardly attractive anymore, and if she is, only rarely does she surpass a 10 on the Allah'sScale'OTail.
what are your thoughts on this social cycle and why won't they cut it the fuck out. ya sniff?
for instance the career span of models, singers actresses, and so forth only being healthy during their early twenties with the immensely talented only having the physical provisions and ratio to continue the trek from hollywood passed the tinsel town grey age of 27.
Otherwise a career is based on superficial looks and superficial looks alone. One that foundation is gone the roof top of intellect and personality and walls of talent are useless to society and the industry it's self.
In result we hear about an impact on society that can only be described in the same manner as nuces impact to a suicide.
Women are thus under the trap of the media, there image isn't good enough, not because they're ugly, but because they're not cosmetic.
They're too fat, their boobs are too small, they need to white it up, too short, and so forth...
but my question is, does this start with the media, or the women? Not so much "who's to blame", but a which came first the Cat or the Catwalk, when it comes to this mentality.
for instance, i'm with a girl whose obsessive use of make up if fully turning me off regardless of her anusly tight vagina and it's oddless glory.
she just cakes it on and cakes it on and cakes it on till she's 3 shades lighter and looks like a tan japanesse geisha.
women have been distorting the feminine image well before the media or contemporary pressure came along. make up, misleading bras, "doing their hair", tanning, skin bleaching, weight watching, holding their stomachs in and so forth
till the point that the REAL LIVE WOMEN is hardly attractive anymore, and if she is, only rarely does she surpass a 10 on the Allah'sScale'OTail.
what are your thoughts on this social cycle and why won't they cut it the fuck out. ya sniff?