PDA

View Full Version : Someone Explain To Me


Longbongcilvaringz
04-29-2008, 10:07 AM
Where is the rest?

85% White Devils?

5% Asian Gods.....

10%....... Homosexuals????

Drop some knowledge on me please.

I want to be dropped on.

Drop it please.

Supreme-NRT
04-29-2008, 10:32 AM
The rest 10% Trannies perhaps ?

Longbongcilvaringz
04-29-2008, 10:34 AM
Are animals included?

I heard 5%ers eat dogs instead of pork?

Any truth in this?

Supreme-NRT
04-29-2008, 10:44 AM
That leads us to he fact that 5%rs are Chinese!

Longbongcilvaringz
04-29-2008, 11:01 AM
Hold up a second

Arent they asiatic BUT black men?

How does that all work?

Skampoe, please explain?

WARPATH
04-29-2008, 07:39 PM
Are animals included?

I heard 5%ers eat dogs instead of pork?

Any truth in this?


No, You have them confused with the 1% and yes we eat dogs.

Black Man
04-30-2008, 10:58 AM
black people are originally from asia but migrated
the 10% are the ones that teach the 85% lies

asia? can you explain?

Tyler Durden
04-30-2008, 11:10 AM
I think I might be racist today.

whitey
04-30-2008, 01:03 PM
I never got that, the "Asiatic Black man". People came out of Africa. Wheres Asia come into play?

Prince Rai
04-30-2008, 01:11 PM
india was once part of what is "africa" today, and now is pushing up the himalayan mountains in "asia". one of many links of basic asian and african link.

V4D3R
04-30-2008, 01:17 PM
Fact - it was genetically "proven as fact" that we come from one eve that originated in South Africa - The ABZU in Sumerian cuneiform text.

The debate rages on...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/12/1227_051227_asia_migration.html


http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/04/24/close.call.ap/index.html
CNN feed but AP story
Humans nearly wiped out 70,000 years ago, study says


Story Highlights
Drought in Africa reduced population into small, isolated groups, study says
Separate study says number of humans may have fallen to 2,000
Analysis: Humans banded together again in Stone Age, increased in numbers
Migrations out of Africa appear to have begun about 60,000 years ago

Black Man
04-30-2008, 01:33 PM
I never got that, the "Asiatic Black man". People came out of Africa. Wheres Asia come into play?

Maybe because what you call Africa wasn't always called Africa. People did not come out of Africa for Africa did not always exists. Those borders are modern, among other reasons.

V4D3R
04-30-2008, 01:35 PM
Maybe because what you call Africa wasn't always called Africa. People did not come out of Africa for Africa did not always exists. Those borders are modern, among other reasons.
thats right - it's first name was ABZU

Black Man
04-30-2008, 01:36 PM
Fact - it was genetically "proven as fact" that we come from one eve that originated in South Africa - The ABZU in Sumerian cuneiform text.

The debate rages on...

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/12/1227_051227_asia_migration.html


http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/04/24/close.call.ap/index.html
CNN feed but AP story
Humans nearly wiped out 70,000 years ago, study says

Story Highlights
Drought in Africa reduced population into small, isolated groups, study says
Separate study says number of humans may have fallen to 2,000
Analysis: Humans banded together again in Stone Age, increased in numbers
Migrations out of Africa appear to have begun about 60,000 years ago

Since it's a fact that genetically we came from one eve out of africa, when was she born and when did she die? What are her origins and beginnings? What year?

V4D3R
04-30-2008, 01:52 PM
Since it's a fact that genetically we came from one eve out of africa, when was she born and when did she die? What are her origins and beginnings? What year?
let me rephrase that shit to make you happy and keep this in line.
Because nothing in archeology is fact really? We cant use potassium orgone dating?

Truth is - this subject is another one of those - we don't really know yet topics.

If Sumerian texts are the truth...then we were spread all over the globe and given more then one language.:learning:

Prince Rai
04-30-2008, 02:00 PM
the sumerian texts were also interpreted as to suggest that our ancient gods were aliens called annunaki. perhaps the origin of the asiatic blackman is far greater than a debate about hat asia and africa are or were.

Black Man
04-30-2008, 03:30 PM
let me rephrase that shit to make you happy and keep this in line.
Because nothing in archeology is fact really? We cant use potassium orgone dating?

Truth is - this subject is another one of those - we don't really know yet topics.

If Sumerian texts are the truth...then we were spread all over the globe and given more then one language.:learning:

thanks for the reply, but you didn't answer one single question i had. i thought you would have answers seeing that you know the facts.

Black Man
04-30-2008, 03:34 PM
thats right - it's first name was ABZU

and this is according to who? who named it abzu? when was it named? what year?

and if this is coming from sumerian text, are you not aware that there are civilization the pre-date them? so how is that the first name?

whitey
04-30-2008, 05:10 PM
Maybe because what you call Africa wasn't always called Africa. People did not come out of Africa for Africa did not always exists. Those borders are modern, among other reasons.



Modern names of land does not effect what happened and where it happened in the past. We say they came from Africa because that is what we call it today. Granted the whole planet at one time was all one big land mass, it does not change that to our best knowledge and testing at this time, the place we today call Africa, no matter where it was at the time modern humans evolved, is referencing the same piece of land.

Black Man
04-30-2008, 05:30 PM
Modern names of land does not effect what happened and where it happened in the past. We say they came from Africa because that is what we call it today. Granted the whole planet at one time was all one big land mass, it does not change that to our best knowledge and testing at this time, the place we today call Africa, no matter where it was at the time modern humans evolved, is referencing the same piece of land.

Originally Posted by whitey http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1153047#post1153047)
I never got that, the "Asiatic Black man". People came out of Africa. Wheres Asia come into play?


You do remember that right?

It does have an effect on multiple levels, because modern borders do not always reflect past borders, among other things.

When a person says Africa, do they think about Asia, the middle east, India? Hell, the Sinai peninsula isn't considered africa and the same applies to egypt not being in africa, yet it's in africa.


Originally Posted by V4D3R http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1153097#post1153097)
thats right - it's first name was ABZU


and this is according to who? who named it abzu? when was it named? what year?

and if this is coming from sumerian text, are you not aware that there are civilization the pre-date them? so how is that the first name?

Originally Posted by V4D3R http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1153061#post1153061)
Fact - it was genetically "proven as fact" that we come from one eve that originated in South Africa - The ABZU in Sumerian cuneiform text.


All of a sudden this isn't a fact anymore?

When you say we come from one eve that originated in south africa, are you referring to the country or just a geographical direction? How far south do you consider south? When does the south begin in africa?

whitey
04-30-2008, 08:11 PM
You do remember that right?

It does have an effect on multiple levels, because modern borders do not always reflect past borders, among other things.

When a person says Africa, do they think about Asia, the middle east, India? Hell, the Sinai peninsula isn't considered africa and the same applies to egypt not being in africa, yet it's in africa.



Uhhh what?

The land masses on earth were settled long before modern man existed. He came out of Africa. He cannot have come out of Asia, he did not come out of Asia.

There were homoerectus in Asia (and Homoneanderthalensis in Europe), albeit a relative of modern man, they went extinct, most likely because of the spread of homosapiens.

Scientists are precise with this kind of thing. If humans originated in Asia, it would be "all signs point to Asia" in all modern texts and studies. That however is not the case.

Black Man
05-01-2008, 07:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitey http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1153047#post1153047)
I never got that, the "Asiatic Black man". People came out of Africa. Wheres Asia come into play?

whitey
05-01-2008, 12:26 PM
Yea I asked that.

So what your saying is 5%ers are different black people (asian black people at that) than the original man black people who came out of Africa. Okay, that makes sense.

V4D3R
05-01-2008, 12:35 PM
^^Blackman - We been through this before - what civilization pre-dates the Sumerian?
The Aryans? We been through that debate and I showed you how it was way before them.
The Vedas story is truly a Sumerian Annunaki story - one that trickled down to that part of the world.

If you can show me something older then these texts - show and prove.

In the Royal Library of Ashurbanipal you'll find a lot of answers about the first documented writings on the creation of mankind.

INF
05-01-2008, 12:40 PM
In the Royal Library of Ashurbanipal you'll find a lot of answers about the first documented writings on the creation of mankind.

Is this something that can be viewed easily?

V4D3R
05-01-2008, 12:49 PM
Is this something that can be viewed easily?
The thing is that a lot of the shit isent even deciphered yet and a lot is missing - this was all found in the ancient city spoken if in the Torah - Ninevah.

There's still many holes in history that need to be filled but a lot can be learnt form the numerous texts found there.

Just google the library name and u can read what's been deciphered so far and what they say.

Black Man
05-01-2008, 01:00 PM
Yea I asked that.

So what your saying is 5%ers are different black people (asian black people at that) than the original man black people who came out of Africa. Okay, that makes sense.

Why ask the question if you already have your answer?

And to what you say in the above, that is whay YOU say, not me.

Going to ask a question because you don't know, then you're going to answer the question that you don't know.

INF
05-01-2008, 01:05 PM
Just google the library name and u can read what's been deciphered so far and what they say.

Got any good links?


I googled it and I havent really found any real translations yet. Just explanations of what this all is and how they still workin on it.

Black Man
05-01-2008, 01:29 PM
^^Blackman - We been through this before - what civilization pre-dates the Sumerian?
The Aryans? We been through that debate and I showed you how it was way before them.
The Vedas story is truly a Sumerian Annunaki story - one that trickled down to that part of the world.

If you can show me something older then these texts - show and prove.

In the Royal Library of Ashurbanipal you'll find a lot of answers about the first documented writings on the creation of mankind.

What text have you shown?

The Twa pre-dates both, as well as the anu sethet, kush, meroe and anu antiu. The Twa are older than all that are mentioned.

The vedas story is not a sumerian annunaki story.

V4D3R
05-01-2008, 03:40 PM
Got any good links?


I googled it and I havent really found any real translations yet. Just explanations of what this all is and how they still workin on it.
This is the best I can do right now.

http://www.earth-history.com/Sumer/Clay-tablets.htm#MS%202426

V4D3R
05-01-2008, 04:08 PM
What text have you shown?

The Twa pre-dates both, as well as the anu sethet, kush, meroe and anu antiu. The Twa are older than all that are mentioned.

The vedas story is not a sumerian annunaki story.

Lol no they dont. Enamu Elish and The Epic of Gilgamesh are older.

Adapa is the text about the first "Adams"
http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/adapa.html

Epic of Gilgamesh (2750 BC - 2500 BC)

http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/index.html



MeroŽ was the southern capital of the Kushite Kingdom, or Napata/Meroitic Kingdom, that spanned the period c. 800 BC - c. 350 AD. MeroŽ is the spelling that we have inherited from the writings of the ancient Romans.

anu antiu - funny how this text you mention has the name of the Sumerian Top godhead.

Egypt was founded by one of Anu's grand-children.

Also - how can any text be older then the oldest known language in the world? Also look at the Philadelphia Tablet on this page 3100 BC - 2900 BC found near Iraq (Ancient Mesopotamia (Sumer)

http://www.upenn.edu/museum/Games/cuneiform.html

Did you know that the sect fighting in Iraq is mostly about one side wanting to reclaim the name of Sumer for Iraq?

INF
05-01-2008, 04:25 PM
Somebody explain to me why we die so fast when we used to live for so long.

WARPATH
05-01-2008, 04:57 PM
Somebody explain to me why we die so fast when we used to live for so long.

It's really just a state of mind in my opinion. Are bodies are mortal. In this day and age we ingest a lot of bullshit, don't exercise or walk that much, fast, pray, meditate, etc.


So we're mentally, physically, and spiritually inferior to our past counter parts.

Our spiritual being can transcend this life, and future lives, if you believe in that type of thing. Our life on our earth is only one aspect of life. I don't think I'm any more dead then my friends that have passed before me. But then again their are other stipulations of ~life after life~(copywrite protected) that I won't go into here based on my own belief system.

WARPATH
05-01-2008, 05:06 PM
This whole argument about ancient people is nonsense. Especially when you start trying to define other peoples origins.

It's just stacking bullshit on more bullshit.

How you going to tell another man his history when you don't even know (or should I say own?) your own history?

That's like me saying: " Yo son, i'm your dad. Word life."

And you maybe a few years older than me, what kind of shit is that?

whitey
05-01-2008, 05:11 PM
Why ask the question if you already have your answer?

And to what you say in the above, that is whay YOU say, not me.

Going to ask a question because you don't know, then you're going to answer the question that you don't know.


Because I was asking why 5%ers say that. Also, its not what I say, its what science says. I know what science says. I agree with what science says. Clearly the two clash.

And you avoided answering the question.

Black Man
05-01-2008, 07:12 PM
Lol no they dont. Enamu Elish and The Epic of Gilgamesh are older.

Adapa is the text about the first "Adams"
http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/adapa.html

Epic of Gilgamesh (2750 BC - 2500 BC)

http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/index.html



MeroŽ was the southern capital of the Kushite Kingdom, or Napata/Meroitic Kingdom, that spanned the period c. 800 BC - c. 350 AD. MeroŽ is the spelling that we have inherited from the writings of the ancient Romans.

anu antiu - funny how this text you mention has the name of the Sumerian Top godhead.

Egypt was founded by one of Anu's grand-children.

Also - how can any text be older then the oldest known language in the world? Also look at the Philadelphia Tablet on this page 3100 BC - 2900 BC found near Iraq (Ancient Mesopotamia (Sumer)

http://www.upenn.edu/museum/Games/cuneiform.html

Did you know that the sect fighting in Iraq is mostly about one side wanting to reclaim the name of Sumer for Iraq?

MANY FALL VICTIM TO THE LIES TOLD ABOUT THE ANCIENT PAST ESPECIALLY WHEN IT CONCERNS ORIGINAL PEOPLE, IE BLACK PEOPLE. MANY EGYPTOLOGIST LIE, CONCEAL, AND HIDE THE TRUTH SO THAT THEIR CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY CAN STAY IN TACT, HOWEVER MANY PEOPLE HAVE REVEALED THEIR ERRORS.

BEFORE I REALLY BEGIN, LETS NOT FORGET THAT THE OLDEST BONES TO BE FOUND ARE LOCATED IN THE GREAT LAKES REGION OF WHAT IS NOW CALLED AFRICA. AS NOTED BY ONE OF THE GREAT HISTORIANS, RUNOKI RASHIDI, HE REVEALS SKELETON HAVE BEEN FOUND DATING BACK OVER 20 MILLION YEARS OLD. AND THE BOOKS ANACALYPSE, THE SAME IS SHOWN HOWEVER, THIS BOOK SHOWS THAT THE ORIGINAL MAN, THE BLACK MAN'S HISTORY GOES BACK NOT JUST MILLIONS, BUT BILLIONS OF YEARS.

NOW LETS CONTINUE......

THE TERA NETER'S TILE IS AN ARTIFACT THAT DATES BACK TO PREDYNASTIC KEMIT CIRCA 5,000 B.C. AND WAS DISCOVERED BY BRITISH EGYPTOLOGIST FLINDERS PETRIE AT THE ABYDOS PREDYNASTIC BURIAL GROUNDS.

IN 1992 WITH THE PUBLISHING OF GEOLOGIST ROBERT M. SCHOCH'S ARTICLE "A MODERN RIDDLE OF THE SPHINX" ARTICLE IN OMNI MAGAZINE, AUGUST 1992 ISSUE. ROBERT SCHOCH ARTICLE WAS FOLLOWED IN 1993 BY HIS COLLABORATOR, WRITER JOHN A. WEST'S ARTICLE "CIVILIZATION RETHOUGHT" IN CONDE NAST TRAVELERS MAGAZINE, FEBRUARY 1993 ISSUE. THEIR CONCLUSION IS THAT THE SPHINX ROCK SCULPTURE WAS CARVED BETWEEN 5,000 AND 7,000 B.C. AND NOT 2,500 B.C. AS CONVENTIONAL EGYPTOLOGY PROMULGATES.

TO BELIEVE THE MESOPOTAMIAN CULTURE TO BE OLDER IS OLDER IS LUDICROUS BUT COMMONLY HELD.

GRAHAM HANCOCK AND ROBERT BAUVAL IN THE MESSAGE OF THE SPHINX: A QUEST FOR THE HIDDEN LEGACY OF MANKIND (CROWN PUBLISHERS, INC NY, 1996) CONCLUDES THAT THE GIZA PLATEAU COMPLEX DATES TO 10,500 B.C.

ACCORDING TO HERODOTUS AND MANETHOS BOTH GIVE AN ACCOUNT THAT DATING BACK TO WELL BEFORE 30,000 B.C. WERE THE "DYNASTY OF THE GODS" AND THEN THE SUCCEEDING "DYNASTY OF THE DEMIGODS." THEY ALSO WERE SAY THAT THE DYNASTIC HUMAN PERIOD IN WHICH THEY LIVED STARTED AT CIRCA 9,000 B.C.

IF ONE IS ABLE TO TAKE A TRIP TO THE LOUVRE MUSEUM IN PARIS FRANCE, THEY WOULD FIND WHAT IS CALLED THE TENTYRA TEMPLE CIRCULAR ZODIAC WHICH WAS BLASTED FROM THE ROOF OF THE TENTYRA TEMPLE BY FRENCH EMPEROR NAPOLEON'S SCIENTIFIC EXPEDITION TO EGYPT HAS RECORDED ON IT THREE TIMES THE PLANET SWITCHED POLES. THE THREE POLAR SHIFTS RECORDED IN THE TENTYRA TEMPLE CIRCULAR ZODIAC AS AT 3,500,000 B.C., 800,000 B.C. AND 270,000 B.C.

ALSO, THE GREAT PYRAMID IRON PLATE ALSO PROVES THAT THE ABOVE PEOPLE THAT I HAVE MENTIONED PREDATES ALL THOSE CIVILIZATIONS THAT YOU SPEAK OF, HOWEVER THIS IRON PLATE IS CONSIDERED A HOAX BECAUSE THIS CAN NOT BE FITTED INTO CONVENTIONAL EGYPTOLOGY'S SHORTENED CHRONOLOGY OF ANCIENT EGYPT/KEMIT.

BRITISH EGYPTOLOGIST FLINDERS PETRIE EXAMINED THE IRON PLATE AND OBSERVED:

THOUGH SOME DOUBT HAS BEEN THROWN ON THE PIECE, MERELY FROM ITS RARITY, [HE NOTED] YET THE VOUCHERS FOR IT ARE VERY PRECISE; AND IT HAS A CAST OF A NUMMULITE [FOSSILIZED MARINE PROTOZOA] ON THE RUST OF IT, PROVING IT TO HAVE BEEN BURIED FOR AGES BESIDES A BLOCK OF NUMMILITE LIMESTONE, AND THEREFOR TO BE CERTAINLY ANCIENT, NO DOUBT CAN THEREFORE EXST ABOUT ITS BEING A REALLY GENUINE PIECE

The Grandmaster
05-01-2008, 07:18 PM
5%ers suck at maths.

whitey
05-01-2008, 07:30 PM
MANY FALL VICTIM TO THE LIES TOLD ABOUT THE ANCIENT PAST ESPECIALLY WHEN IT CONCERNS ORIGINAL PEOPLE, IE BLACK PEOPLE. MANY EGYPTOLOGIST LIE, CONCEAL, AND HIDE THE TRUTH SO THAT THEIR CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY CAN STAY IN TACT, HOWEVER MANY PEOPLE HAVE REVEALED THEIR ERRORS.

BEFORE I REALLY BEGIN, LETS NOT FORGET THAT THE OLDEST BONES TO BE FOUND ARE LOCATED IN THE GREAT LAKES REGION OF WHAT IS NOW CALLED AFRICA. AS NOTED BY ONE OF THE GREAT HISTORIANS, RUNOKI RASHIDI, HE REVEALS SKELETON HAVE BEEN FOUND DATING BACK OVER 20 MILLION YEARS OLD. AND THE BOOKS ANACALYPSE, THE SAME IS SHOWN HOWEVER, THIS BOOK SHOWS THAT THE ORIGINAL MAN, THE BLACK MAN'S HISTORY GOES BACK NOT JUST MILLIONS, BUT BILLIONS OF YEARS.

NOW LETS CONTINUE......

THE TERA NETER'S TILE IS AN ARTIFACT THAT DATES BACK TO PREDYNASTIC KEMIT CIRCA 5,000 B.C. AND WAS DISCOVERED BY BRITISH EGYPTOLOGIST FLINDERS PETRIE AT THE ABYDOS PREDYNASTIC BURIAL GROUNDS.

IN 1992 WITH THE PUBLISHING OF GEOLOGIST ROBERT M. SCHOCH'S ARTICLE "A MODERN RIDDLE OF THE SPHINX" ARTICLE IN OMNI MAGAZINE, AUGUST 1992 ISSUE. ROBERT SCHOCH ARTICLE WAS FOLLOWED IN 1993 BY HIS COLLABORATOR, WRITER JOHN A. WEST'S ARTICLE "CIVILIZATION RETHOUGHT" IN CONDE NAST TRAVELERS MAGAZINE, FEBRUARY 1993 ISSUE. THEIR CONCLUSION IS THAT THE SPHINX ROCK SCULPTURE WAS CARVED BETWEEN 5,000 AND 7,000 B.C. AND NOT 2,500 B.C. AS CONVENTIONAL EGYPTOLOGY PROMULGATES.

TO BELIEVE THE MESOPOTAMIAN CULTURE TO BE OLDER IS OLDER IS LUDICROUS BUT COMMONLY HELD.

GRAHAM HANCOCK AND ROBERT BAUVAL IN THE MESSAGE OF THE SPHINX: A QUEST FOR THE HIDDEN LEGACY OF MANKIND (CROWN PUBLISHERS, INC NY, 1996) CONCLUDES THAT THE GIZA PLATEAU COMPLEX DATES TO 10,500 B.C.

ACCORDING TO HERODOTUS AND MANETHOS BOTH GIVE AN ACCOUNT THAT DATING BACK TO WELL BEFORE 30,000 B.C. WERE THE "DYNASTY OF THE GODS" AND THEN THE SUCCEEDING "DYNASTY OF THE DEMIGODS." THEY ALSO WERE SAY THAT THE DYNASTIC HUMAN PERIOD IN WHICH THEY LIVED STARTED AT CIRCA 9,000 B.C.

IF ONE IS ABLE TO TAKE A TRIP TO THE LOUVRE MUSEUM IN PARIS FRANCE, THEY WOULD FIND WHAT IS CALLED THE TENTYRA TEMPLE CIRCULAR ZODIAC WHICH WAS BLASTED FROM THE ROOF OF THE TENTYRA TEMPLE BY FRENCH EMPEROR NAPOLEON'S SCIENTIFIC EXPEDITION TO EGYPT HAS RECORDED ON IT THREE TIMES THE PLANET SWITCHED POLES. THE THREE POLAR SHIFTS RECORDED IN THE TENTYRA TEMPLE CIRCULAR ZODIAC AS AT 3,500,000 B.C., 800,000 B.C. AND 270,000 B.C.

ALSO, THE GREAT PYRAMID IRON PLATE ALSO PROVES THAT THE ABOVE PEOPLE THAT I HAVE MENTIONED PREDATES ALL THOSE CIVILIZATIONS THAT YOU SPEAK OF, HOWEVER THIS IRON PLATE IS CONSIDERED A HOAX BECAUSE THIS CAN NOT BE FITTED INTO CONVENTIONAL EGYPTOLOGY'S SHORTENED CHRONOLOGY OF ANCIENT EGYPT/KEMIT.

BRITISH EGYPTOLOGIST FLINDERS PETRIE EXAMINED THE IRON PLATE AND OBSERVED:

THOUGH SOME DOUBT HAS BEEN THROWN ON THE PIECE, MERELY FROM ITS RARITY, [HE NOTED] YET THE VOUCHERS FOR IT ARE VERY PRECISE; AND IT HAS A CAST OF A NUMMULITE [FOSSILIZED MARINE PROTOZOA] ON THE RUST OF IT, PROVING IT TO HAVE BEEN BURIED FOR AGES BESIDES A BLOCK OF NUMMILITE LIMESTONE, AND THEREFOR TO BE CERTAINLY ANCIENT, NO DOUBT CAN THEREFORE EXST ABOUT ITS BEING A REALLY GENUINE PIECE


Annnd thats where I stopped reading.