PDA

View Full Version : New bill could make Bush president for life


Sub-Zer0
06-14-2005, 12:19 PM
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/june2005/140605bush.jpg

A House bill has been introduced that would change the 22nd amendment and enable George Bush to remain President for the rest of his political life.

The bill would repeal limitations on a President holding office for a maximum of two terms.

An even darker scenario, Arnold Schwarzenegger is elected as President in 2008 and shorty after the 22nd amendment is abolished, making the Hitler admirer our permanent Fuhrer.

This is the modern day version of the Enabling Act (http://www.govsux.com/enable.htm), which allowed Hitler to officially declare himself dictator.

The bill, which can be found at the Library of Congress website here (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:), reads as follows.

----------------------------------

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)

HJ 24 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. J. RES. 24
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article --

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'.

------------------------------

The 22nd amendment as reprinted on the Find Law Website (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment22/) reads as follows.

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.


Annotations
Limitation of Presidential Terms

''By reason of the lack of a positive expression upon the subject of the tenure of the office of President, and by reason of a well-defined custom which has risen in the past that no President should have more than two terms in that office, much discussion has resulted upon this subject. Hence it is the purpose of this . . . [proposal] . . . to submit this question to the people so they, by and through the recognized processes, may express their views upon this question, and if they shall so elect, they may . . . thereby set at rest this problem.'' 1

LadySnowBlood
06-14-2005, 12:21 PM
Why hasn't anyone assasinated him yet?

MefMan36
06-14-2005, 12:36 PM
Well Im joining Lady Snow blood back where I was born in Montreal.

kingidivine
06-14-2005, 12:38 PM
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/june2005/140605bush.jpg

A House bill has been introduced that would change the 22nd amendment and enable George Bush to remain President for the rest of his political life.

The bill would repeal limitations on a President holding office for a maximum of two terms.

An even darker scenario, Arnold Schwarzenegger is elected as President in 2008 and shorty after the 22nd amendment is abolished, making the Hitler admirer our permanent Fuhrer.

This is the modern day version of the Enabling Act (http://www.govsux.com/enable.htm), which allowed Hitler to officially declare himself dictator.

The bill, which can be found at the Library of Congress website here (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:), reads as follows.

----------------------------------

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)

HJ 24 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. J. RES. 24
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article --

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'.

------------------------------

The 22nd amendment as reprinted on the Find Law Website (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment22/) reads as follows.

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.


Annotations
Limitation of Presidential Terms

''By reason of the lack of a positive expression upon the subject of the tenure of the office of President, and by reason of a well-defined custom which has risen in the past that no President should have more than two terms in that office, much discussion has resulted upon this subject. Hence it is the purpose of this . . . [proposal] . . . to submit this question to the people so they, by and through the recognized processes, may express their views upon this question, and if they shall so elect, they may . . . thereby set at rest this problem.'' 1:no: sad stuff. you people believe anything you read on the internet.

Queen Of Poetry
06-14-2005, 12:40 PM
Now that would make a great a scary movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ronin
06-14-2005, 12:43 PM
lol, it could happen

no doh t arnie will run for president one day and you dumb yanks will vote him in

he loves the nazis too, would love a world government im sure

Queen Of Poetry
06-14-2005, 12:45 PM
I wouldn't vote for Arnold....I don't even understand what he is saying

Sun Tzu, Tha Soul Controllah
06-14-2005, 12:47 PM
Well Im joining Lady Snow blood back where I was born in Montreal.
DAMN STRAIGHT I GOT NIGGAS I KNOW UP IN SCARBOROUGH TOO MOTHER FUCK THE US goddamned place

Queen Of Poetry
06-14-2005, 12:48 PM
Damn.......

num2son
06-14-2005, 02:07 PM
Now that would make a great a scary movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:no: THat would be horrible.

Definitive X
06-14-2005, 02:25 PM
Believe it or not, they ARE actually trying to fix the amendment saying that you have to be born in the U.S. to become president, but fuck that...

OBAMA FOR PREZ IN '08!

Liquidswordsman
06-14-2005, 02:29 PM
it will never change, the funny thing is the prople trying to change it want to call it the Arnold bill. lol

deadlymelody
06-14-2005, 02:45 PM
Why hasn't anyone assasinated him yet?
That's cold but I just found that quote ROFL.

SHRAP
06-14-2005, 02:49 PM
Well Im joining Lady Snow blood back where I was born in Montreal.
yea motherfucker

I-Legit
06-14-2005, 09:04 PM
Now that would make a great a scary movie!!!!!!!!!!!!! yeh and all u have to do is turn on ya cam corder and take a walk outside once USA becomes a police state......now thats how u make a HOME VIDEO scary movie.....yes indeedy

Hidden Chamber
06-14-2005, 09:15 PM
What da fuck, hell no!

T.H.O.M.A.S. Man
06-14-2005, 09:52 PM
that's gonna give me nightmares..

this clown needs to be impeached for real

THE W
06-14-2005, 10:33 PM
it'll never pass

Wu-Fam Specializt
06-14-2005, 10:40 PM
LOL at the silly little fucks saying Arnold will be president. You HAVE to be born here to become president! This is already established, and yes Arnold has talked about how he WOULD run if he could. But he CAN'T. So fuck him and everyone else, lol.

I'd like to see Obama as president next, but unfortunately I don't think we will. Hilary Clinton will probably get the Democratic nomination, and we'll most likely see her as our 1st woman prez in '08.

O-N-E

SHRAP
06-14-2005, 10:41 PM
yea id like to see Osama as prez too

Ronin
06-15-2005, 05:40 AM
lol wu fam, youll be suprised whats changing man, the second patriot act will hopefully make un aware yanks aware of the devious fucks at work, if you dont follow them into the fire, your a fucking TERRORIST!

repo
06-15-2005, 09:37 AM
if it passed it would make bill clinton eligible for re-election. his approval rating was higher the day of his impeachment than bush's is now. so we just know how that goes.

but these are different TIMES ... "we're at war here" ... we have to "support our asshat of a president" ... pls let me go puke now

T.H.O.M.A.S. Man
06-15-2005, 12:31 PM
bush is a warhero though, he fought valiantly and now he's fighting terrorists. go bush

Wu-Fam Specializt
06-15-2005, 01:48 PM
lol wu fam, youll be suprised whats changing man, the second patriot act will hopefully make un aware yanks aware of the devious fucks at work, if you dont follow them into the fire, your a fucking TERRORIST!
Man get a life with your constant "I hate America, and all Americans" bullshit. It's seriously pathetic. What is your fat ass going to accomplish by talking shit on a Wu forum? Yeah, I'm a terrorist..........I don't even support Bush, and in both elections I have been able to vote in, I voted against him. I don't support him, I don't support the war, and I don't support little fat kids who talk stupid shit behind their computers.

O-N-E

Ronin
06-15-2005, 04:11 PM
what the fucks your problem man? i wasnt even talking shit to you

EDIT: removed insult

Ironlungz
06-15-2005, 05:29 PM
muthafucka, i'ma stay here in norway and hope he ain't get to me...
not that i'd get into the US with my record....

R3beLuTionAry
06-15-2005, 05:41 PM
ill treat arnold like arnie from what's eating gilbert grape and slap the shit outta him.. wap!

faderlaceratah
06-15-2005, 05:58 PM
Well Im joining Lady Snow blood back where I was born in Montreal.i hear ya, bredren. I'm glad I live in Canada.

Wu-Fam Specializt
06-15-2005, 09:57 PM
what the fucks your problem man? i wasnt even talking shit to you

EDIT: removed insultYou called me a terrorist dude.

But if I misunderstood what you were saying, or how you were saying it...then I apologize.


O-N-E

Ronin
06-16-2005, 03:22 AM
You called me a terrorist dude.

But if I misunderstood what you were saying, or how you were saying it...then I apologize.


O-N-E
what i said

lol wu fam, youll be suprised whats changing man, the second patriot act will hopefully make un aware yanks aware of the devious fucks at work, if you dont follow them into the fire, your a fucking TERRORIST!
my point wasnt calling u a terrorist, its that the patriot act makes people out to be terrorists if u comit crime and dont abide by the new laws and bullshit amendmants

it was kind of a joke

Rooty P
06-18-2005, 10:04 PM
None of you know shit about politics...fuck...

Bone Collecta
06-18-2005, 10:32 PM
this is bullshti to scare u into voting Democratic. lol if u are black you should be a republican. that is if u know the history.......the REAL history

TonyStarks29
06-18-2005, 11:46 PM
Clinton was the one who wanted them to bring this up. Last year or something, there was some news that he wanted a bill that would repeal the 22nd ammendment so he could run for another term.

TonyStarks29
06-18-2005, 11:50 PM
The thing I'm most scared about, though, is Hillary Clinton being elected. She is a racist, socialist, and all-around bitch. I would much prefer Barack Obama or Rudy Giuliani. Both of them are great candidates and are not too extreme on either side.

ThePharaohNosferatu
06-19-2005, 12:15 PM
I just hope none of the bushes runs again, Not JEB or Laura, cause thats what the word is, that they are thinking of doin it.

that'll be FUCKED UP if it comes down to chosing from either Hillary or Laura in 08

repo
06-19-2005, 12:31 PM
this is bullshti to scare u into voting Democratic. lol if u are black you should be a republican. that is if u know the history.......the REAL historyi'd like to see this real history ...

the republican party is not the "party of lincoln" anymore. yeah the republicans were antislavery in the 1860s, but not anymore. with support for the privatization of prisons and constantly defeating measures to raise the minimum wage, the republicans are more pro-slavery than ever.

it was about the time of the civil rights movement when it all started switching, republicans used their support for "states rights" as their argument for keeping the status of blacks second class in the south and a lot of the ol skool racist southern democrats liked that idea and thought it might be worth switching parties for.

it got further desecrated by the christian coalition and all this bullshit over the abortions and the homos, so now currently the republican party is the party of the extreme religious fanatics as well as the racist businesscrats that want to keep the rich white men in power because that is who elected them.

the ONLY attraction of the black community to the republican party is relating to the social conservatism because a great number deeply hold the religious beliefs that their ancestors' masters beat into them back in the day.

the democratic party is not much better though, they are also in it just to keep the corporations in power that got them elected, and maintain privilege for the privileged. they just front like they don't.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 03:10 PM
i'd like to see this real history ...

the republican party is not the "party of lincoln" anymore. yeah the republicans were antislavery in the 1860s, but not anymore. with support for the privatization of prisons and constantly defeating measures to raise the minimum wage, the republicans are more pro-slavery than ever.

it was about the time of the civil rights movement when it all started switching, republicans used their support for "states rights" as their argument for keeping the status of blacks second class in the south and a lot of the ol skool racist southern democrats liked that idea and thought it might be worth switching parties for.

it got further desecrated by the christian coalition and all this bullshit over the abortions and the homos, so now currently the republican party is the party of the extreme religious fanatics as well as the racist businesscrats that want to keep the rich white men in power because that is who elected them.

the ONLY attraction of the black community to the republican party is relating to the social conservatism because a great number deeply hold the religious beliefs that their ancestors' masters beat into them back in the day.

the democratic party is not much better though, they are also in it just to keep the corporations in power that got them elected, and maintain privilege for the privileged. they just front like they don't.
Thats a lie they are still the same ppl and so are the democrats. You know that the democrats started the KKK? You know that barely any democrats voted on any of the civil rights programs and stopped a few from passing. They used to be the ones who beat the black ppl for going to the polls and were the ones who installed the black codes. The few democrats who did "help" the black ppl they were supported by the Republicans NOT the Democrats. Im talking about the recent ones and not just the old days. The democrats have a history of killing and beating minorities and preventing them to vote yet we help them by trying to vote these fools in. You all have been blinded into seeing who the real problem is.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 03:11 PM
o and THEY NEVER SWITCHED that is a lie

TonyStarks29
06-19-2005, 03:46 PM
Democrats changed a lot- they used to be the party of freedoms and equality, used to be the best party in like 40's-Kennedy, but when Kennedy died, the Democrat Party died. It's now too shattered and spread out-liberals, hawks, commies...it's not a real party anymore.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 04:21 PM
thats a lie as well there were only a couple of decent ones who actually wanted equality the rest were FOR segregation. lol its funny no body does their political research but we critisize other black ppl or ppl in general for being republican

TonyStarks29
06-19-2005, 04:23 PM
ALL the parties back then were for segregation. But they were better than the republicans. Republicans are a lot better today.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 04:36 PM
no the republicans up to 70% were not for segregation while more than 70% of democrats were and still are.

repo
06-19-2005, 04:46 PM
look at the republican party today and tell me where they are voting for anything that helps anyone besides the christians or the corporations. anything at all. voting records, come on yall, give me names! not just made-up statistics and revisionist history that someone on the street or some wacked out college professor told you

and YES
the democrats are just as bad

if any country needs "liberation" it is USA

TonyStarks29
06-19-2005, 05:19 PM
no the republicans up to 70% were not for segregation while more than 70% of democrats were and still are.
haha, damn, i've been lied to all of school.

Shows how liberal schools are.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 05:55 PM
yes even the schools have been lying to you there is a movie/documentary called setting the record straight: american history in black and whitehttps://ssl4.westserver.net/wallbuilders/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/AAPVDVDlg.gif

which talks about the old days and even up to the 60s and 70s lets you know what really was going on. It provides documents in it showing that past US presidents who were democrats were for segregation and even helped to fund the Ku Klux Klan.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 05:57 PM
look at the republican party today and tell me where they are voting for anything that helps anyone besides the christians or the corporations. anything at all. voting records, come on yall, give me names! not just made-up statistics and revisionist history that someone on the street or some wacked out college professor told you

and YES
the democrats are just as bad

if any country needs "liberation" it is USA
the republicans have found jobs etc, you know why ppl have no work? cause they are already replacing ppl with machines. I walked into a wal-mart where you dont even need ppl anymore its a do it urself machine. shit is terrible how machines are taking away the 9-5 jobs some ppl need.

TonyStarks29
06-19-2005, 06:26 PM
Thanks for the vid, I'll look for it.

JASPER
06-19-2005, 06:32 PM
Bush will choke on a pretzel before he gets to finish this term

Rebel_INS
06-19-2005, 06:43 PM
Haha thats crazy

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 07:22 PM
Thanks for the vid, I'll look for it.
google it u might only be able to find it online unfortunatly

Sicka than aidZ
06-19-2005, 08:04 PM
Why hasn't anyone assasinated him yet?it's cuz his t.v. show,...on comedy centreal.....that shit was funny as hell, like when he took xtc.



P.I.R.,that's what's up!

whitey
06-19-2005, 08:15 PM
Thats a lie they are still the same ppl and so are the democrats. You know that the democrats started the KKK? You know that barely any democrats voted on any of the civil rights programs and stopped a few from passing. They used to be the ones who beat the black ppl for going to the polls and were the ones who installed the black codes. The few democrats who did "help" the black ppl they were supported by the Republicans NOT the Democrats. Im talking about the recent ones and not just the old days. The democrats have a history of killing and beating minorities and preventing them to vote yet we help them by trying to vote these fools in. You all have been blinded into seeing who the real problem is.
you are brainwashed son.

JASPER
06-19-2005, 08:32 PM
"white skin developed from black skin over about 20.000 years of natural selection."

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH...HAAHHAHAHAAHAHAH

HAHAA

AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 09:07 PM
you are brainwashed son.
DO THE RESEARCH....you will find out ur the brainwashed one

TonyStarks29
06-19-2005, 09:11 PM
I find it funny how, if someone has republican beliefs, they are automatically "brainwashed."

whitey
06-19-2005, 10:08 PM
"white skin developed from black skin over about 20.000 years of natural selection."

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH...HAAHHAHAHAAHAHAH

HAHAA

AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
you find that funny because...?

The evolution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution) of the different skin colours is thought to have occurred as follows: the haired ancestor of humans, like modern great apes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_ape), had light skin under their hair. Once the hair was lost, they evolved dark skin, needed to prevent low folate levels since they lived in sun-rich Africa. (The skin cancer connection is probably of secondary importance, since skin cancer usually kills only after the reproductive age and therefore doesn't exert much evolutionary pressure.) When humans migrated to sun-poorer regions in the north, low vitamin D3 levels became a problem and light skin colour evolved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color

DO THE RESEARCH....you will find out ur the brainwashed oneive done the research son. i know the research. you read someones skewed views and you think youre an expert?


I find it funny how, if someone has republican beliefs, they are automatically "brainwashed."
thats a nice generalization but wrong. i was commenting on bone collecta's brainwashing, not everyones. most republicans are republicans for certain reasons.

the people usually fall in the category that a couple of political scientists explained as the "silent majority" that won nixon the 1968 and 72 elections. them being "unyoung, unpoor, and unblack". people who strongly associate with religion mainly christianity fall in there too.

The head of the NAACP at the time of nixon's REPUBLICAN presidency was quoted as saying "For the first time since Woodrow Wilson, we have a national administration that can be rightly charactereized as anti-Negro."

Get you're facts straight.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 10:23 PM
that was an opinion but he was wrong. My grandmother worked for the Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr. administrations as assistant secretary of agriculture. She said she was an independent and the republicans always treated her better than the democrats. she said she encountered alot of conflict when they were in office. She later became a republican because of the things she experienced.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 10:25 PM
the NAACP is not immune to anything. just cause they agree with something doesnt mean you have to follow suit. they can be mislead as well. What family is one of the major donators to the UNCF hmmmm lemme think.........................................The Bush's

whitey
06-19-2005, 10:28 PM
the NAACP is not immune to anything. just cause they agree with something doesnt mean you have to follow suit. they can be mislead as well. What family is one of the major donators to the UNCF hmmmm lemme think.........................................The Bush's

seems to me your just picking specific smaller examples that seem to show your point, but youre avioding the big things.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 10:32 PM
the big things are already pointed out lol the democrats have supported the Ku Klux Klan and many democrats still are members lol they tried to say it switched but they are liars my friend. Do your research better

whitey
06-19-2005, 10:43 PM
abe lincoln's republican party aint the same as todays republican party.


i dont know too many democrats that rock confederate flags.


i kinda find it odd most of the south, and former conderates are the ones that vote republican and seems to be where the kkk is flurishing.




yes you are correct in saying that members of the democrats started the kkk, but the same people that used to be in the old democrats are now the ones in todays republican party. democrats used to control the south and were for slavery and ceceeding the union, once the parties platforms switched, the same people who used to be dems just became republicans, whats hard about understanding that?

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 11:00 PM
lol they didnt switch is the point. and another point is that republicans even today have put in more black ppl into offices than the democrats have. very minimal from the dems they lie you cant trust democrats they have NOT switched

T.H.O.M.A.S. Man
06-19-2005, 11:20 PM
Originally Posted by Bone Collecta
Thats a lie they are still the same ppl and so are the democrats. You know that the democrats started the KKK? You know that barely any democrats voted on any of the civil rights programs and stopped a few from passing. They used to be the ones who beat the black ppl for going to the polls and were the ones who installed the black codes. The few democrats who did "help" the black ppl they were supported by the Republicans NOT the Democrats. Im talking about the recent ones and not just the old days. The democrats have a history of killing and beating minorities and preventing them to vote yet we help them by trying to vote these fools in. You all have been blinded into seeing who the real problem is.they also had a thing called the whig party cause they were heated about the president becoming to much like the king. i think they beat blacks too.

which recent republicans are helping the blacks? trent lott is really bending over backwards huh?

ive brought this up before but no one noticed it. congress recently voted whether or not to publicly apologize for not doing anything more to stop lynching. it passed by 80%. of that 20% that decided that hanging black people for whistling at decent white folk wasn't worthy of apology, what percentage do you think were republican? id bet 100%.

Bone Collecta
06-19-2005, 11:29 PM
the whig party became the democrats u know Thomas Jefferson? ya he was one

whitey
06-20-2005, 12:03 AM
where do you get this from? do you work for the republican party and pose as a black kid on the internet trying to get votes from the wu tang demographic?

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 12:08 AM
not really and you insulting me proves nothing.

T.H.O.M.A.S. Man
06-20-2005, 12:30 AM
the whig party became the democrats u know Thomas Jefferson? ya he was one
but the democrats of then are the republicans of now

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 01:59 AM
no they are NOT lol you youngin have been influenced by the wrong ppl

whitey
06-20-2005, 05:57 PM
not really and you insulting me proves nothing.

i wasnt meaning to insult you. i was being serious. i honestly do not see where you come to you're conclussion.

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 06:05 PM
Wilson was a democrat was he not? he funded the Klan Nixon might have been an asshole, but then Carter came in My granmother worked for his administration then into the reagan and bush sr admin. so she woul know things dont ya think? then Clinton really brainwashed u ppl thinking he was a grreat pres wow. and they did it so bad that yall hate bush jr. There are a few bad apples in the republican party but not as many as in the democratic party. They never changed, etc... go watch that movie i talked about

whitey
06-20-2005, 08:49 PM
wilson was a democrat, he was a racist. doesnt prove anything. it was 90 years ago.


maybe you come from money. then i can understand why you would relate with republicans.

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 08:52 PM
actually i dont and Republicans have done more for the black ppl so why would i be democrat? I dont consider myself either but now i lean more to republican because of the information i know.

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 08:53 PM
90 yrs ago doesnt excuse anything he funded the KKK thats enough i need to know.

whitey
06-20-2005, 08:57 PM
good thing you live 90 years ago...

whitey
06-20-2005, 09:02 PM
are you claiming most of the african american public is too stupid to realize the democrats are really bullshitting them and that republicans are really their knights in shinning armor?

whitey
06-20-2005, 09:05 PM
im not saying the democrats necessarily are but republicans definatly aint doing it for them

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 10:10 PM
lol actually yes the democrats have brainwashed the ppl into thinking that republicans are the bad guys which is not the case. the democrats kiss babies and promise a bunch of bullshit that they never actually do. Then they hide the bad things they did with scandals like the monica lewinsky shit(clinton did alot worse things than the lewinsky shit) like how the embassy in africa was bombed and he didnt do shit about it. why not? that is a decleration of war in the rules of war. then when he sent troops to another part of africa he sent them very unprepared and when they requested more they refused and we lost soldiers. then yall complain about what Bush was doing?

repo
06-20-2005, 10:27 PM
bone collecta is correct on the dems are corrupt frontin bastards
and i hate their ideas that no one should have guns thats on some socialist bullshit that just be asking for police state

and the converse is not that the republicans are any more honorable

must overthrow like fucking NOW

whitey
06-20-2005, 10:29 PM
clinton sent them into somalia to stop a genocide, shit did not turn out well at all. got them the fuck out.


bush MADE UP A WAR, has and is getting lots of people on both sides killed, and were supposed to be cool with that?

bush and regan and the rest of the republicans are all about money. regan made the rich richer when he was their. bush works with the same shit, help his buddies out.


you never clarified your monetary status either...

Bone Collecta
06-20-2005, 10:37 PM
you have the records of the rich ppl getting richer and how the poor got poorer? can you show me what documents tell u this?

whitey
06-20-2005, 10:39 PM
pretty widely recognized as such. when i have more time ill do some of that.

TonyStarks29
06-20-2005, 11:30 PM
you may say the rich get richer and and the poor get poorer, but can you prove how supplying ridiculous amounts of welfare to the lower tax brackets helps them get out of poverty? It doesn't. The people who get welfare today are a lot different than my parents, who got it decades ago. Back then, they worked hard to get out of the system; today, people stay in the system.


And the Confederate Flag is bastardized. People have been brainwashed into believing the Confederate Flag represents racism. Well, it doesn't. It was flown by the soldiers who fought for the confederacy; they were valiant men, and are regarded as such by all historians and soldiers during the time. I've lived in New York and New England all my life, and I'm Spanish and Jewish, and I recognize that the Confederate Flag is not what it is made out to be.

repo
06-20-2005, 11:46 PM
symbols are ONLY what people make them out to be

whitey
06-21-2005, 12:23 AM
werd, valid points. i was just drawing the conclusion that the people today who use it are related with being a souther hick from a bush state.

and those people happen vote repulican.

Bone Collecta
06-21-2005, 02:05 AM
nope they vote democrat at least the klan does. lol u know the leader or the Confederacy was Jefferson Davis who was a.....................Democrat

whitey
06-21-2005, 12:46 PM
yea dude, you dont get it though. all the rich country clubbers and all those other people stopped voting democrat and vote republican now.


kkk does not vote democrat are you crazy? they love their guns and all that other shit, which republicans love, which democrats pass bills against.


Nixons strategy was dont even try winning african american votes because its a lost cause.

he thought it was best to win whites over, and convince them on social interests to get them to vote republican even if democrats were better for them economically.


they got poor white southers to vote for them because they made a stance that stick with us because we are for you white people. democrats may have things that will make youre life better through economical polices but it would also help poor blacks and they convinced them it was more important to unite on social issues than economical ones.


i honestly dont get how you cant see this. all the examples you are giving of kkk and all this other bullshit are like a hundred years old. shit changes bro. its seriously boggling here.


and once again you failed to tell what tax braquet you fall in...

Bone Collecta
06-21-2005, 12:51 PM
im middle class now that im with my pops but when i was with my mother we struggled she at one time took on 3 jobs to support us and pay the bills and still had tim to be a mother. im not rich, i know what its like to not have alot.

RhymzaRua
06-22-2005, 07:04 AM
Umm, no offense Bone, cuz we both from HBHH, but I really TRULY know how the Democratic party works. Both my parents are DEEPLY rooted in local politics, and they are both Democrats. That includes my dad, who did REAL work for the Civil Rights Movement, though BOTH of them are far from racist, and raised me as such.

That said, the Democratic party is DEFINITELY anti-racism, moreso than the Republican party, not just in preach, but in practice too. In NYC, it has passed tangible legislation that HELPS BLACKS, and I know full well that both my parents have fought racism in their time as local politicians.

Plus, I know that this applies to the national party too, because I know that the Dem. party works like a ladder, from local to less local to less local to national. Yes, parties DO CHANGE, and you CANNOT tell simply from how racist the specific administrations were to your grandmother about which parties will do the most for YOU, because party issues/goals run deeper than specific people. If you don't do what your party expects of you, then it's hard to get your bills actually passed into law.

All that said, of course there ARE many exceptions from both parties, but I'm deeply enough entwined with politics that I see the big, RECENT picture. I mean, where do you think the whole idea of affirmative action came from? Lyndon Johnson came up with the concept and pushed it strongly as president, and he was a RECENT Democrat.

Now, I welcome a response to this, but please man don't come with any stuff about the OLD party, cuz it doesn't apply, I absolutely know that much.

RhymzaRua
06-24-2005, 09:23 AM
Bump, you didn't respond Bone.

BRONZBODY
06-24-2005, 09:53 AM
www.infowars.com (http://www.infowars.com)

www.prisonplanet.com (http://www.prisonplanet.com)

www.arnoldexposed.com (http://www.arnoldexposed.com)

check em out yall.....SERIOUSLY........

AK Spray
06-24-2005, 10:13 AM
Nice.. Hopefully this shit is true... Just cuz it's funny to watch all the liberal muhfuckas complain and shit... lol.

whitey
06-24-2005, 11:15 AM
Umm, no offense Bone, cuz we both from HBHH, but I really TRULY know how the Democratic party works. Both my parents are DEEPLY rooted in local politics, and they are both Democrats. That includes my dad, who did REAL work for the Civil Rights Movement, though BOTH of them are far from racist, and raised me as such.

That said, the Democratic party is DEFINITELY anti-racism, moreso than the Republican party, not just in preach, but in practice too. In NYC, it has passed tangible legislation that HELPS BLACKS, and I know full well that both my parents have fought racism in their time as local politicians.

Plus, I know that this applies to the national party too, because I know that the Dem. party works like a ladder, from local to less local to less local to national. Yes, parties DO CHANGE, and you CANNOT tell simply from how racist the specific administrations were to your grandmother about which parties will do the most for YOU, because party issues/goals run deeper than specific people. If you don't do what your party expects of you, then it's hard to get your bills actually passed into law.

All that said, of course there ARE many exceptions from both parties, but I'm deeply enough entwined with politics that I see the big, RECENT picture. I mean, where do you think the whole idea of affirmative action came from? Lyndon Johnson came up with the concept and pushed it strongly as president, and he was a RECENT Democrat.

Now, I welcome a response to this, but please man don't come with any stuff about the OLD party, cuz it doesn't apply, I absolutely know that much.

word life.

RhymzaRua
06-24-2005, 11:20 AM
Nice.. Hopefully this shit is true... Just cuz it's funny to watch all the liberal muhfuckas complain and shit... lol.
LMAO, you're more concerned with making liberals annoyed than you are with how stuff actually AFFECTS the country.

Sun Tzu, Tha Soul Controllah
06-24-2005, 11:29 AM
stop acting like a bitch and lighten the fuck up










seriously, why does everything have to be serious? this is a forum, you're suppose to escape from the trouble of life on here......but why am i explainin shit, do whatever the fuck you want

RhymzaRua
06-24-2005, 01:05 PM
stop acting like a bitch and lighten the fuck up










seriously, why does everything have to be serious? this is a forum, you're suppose to escape from the trouble of life on here......but why am i explainin shit, do whatever the fuck you want
Y'know, that's exactly the point I just argued in another thread, where someone criticized people for kidding around and having fun in the thread. But this is different, why can't there be serious threads as well as fun threads?

whitey
06-25-2005, 11:28 PM
back to bone collecta thinking republicans are the real party of african americans.


This is from Rochester NY's paper, the person mentioned is Julian Bond the chairman of the NAACP's board of directors and former NAACP leader Kweisi Mfume.


Relations between the NAACP and Bush administration have been strained. Bond has condemned the administration's policies on education, the economy and the war in Iraq and urged high black voter turnout to defeat Bush for re-election last year. And Mfume once described Bush's black supporters as "ventriloquists' dummies."


There was another artcle i can only remember peices and i dont have it handy right this second, that the house (majority republicans) passed a bill that okayed HUGE cuts in social programs. Stuff for under achieving, less funded schools, and some other pretty important stuff that I wish I could remember. Most inner city poorly funded schools around me have majority non white kids in them, idk how it is other places, but I dont really see how thats helping African Americans.

Liquidswordsman
06-25-2005, 11:29 PM
Vote Pedro

LHX
06-25-2005, 11:36 PM
would a new president really do anything better than bush?

Liquidswordsman
06-25-2005, 11:44 PM
would a new president really do anything better than bush?
No, just the same shit.

whitey
06-26-2005, 12:35 AM
tough question.

depends what party he is from and what kind of man(or woman, on the outside chance) they are.

6thPlanet
06-26-2005, 01:55 AM
http://www.jeb.org/

Bone Collecta
06-26-2005, 02:51 AM
back to bone collecta thinking republicans are the real party of african americans.


This is from Rochester NY's paper, the person mentioned is Julian Bond the chairman of the NAACP's board of directors and former NAACP leader Kweisi Mfume.


Relations between the NAACP and Bush administration have been strained. Bond has condemned the administration's policies on education, the economy and the war in Iraq and urged high black voter turnout to defeat Bush for re-election last year. And Mfume once described Bush's black supporters as "ventriloquists' dummies."


There was another artcle i can only remember peices and i dont have it handy right this second, that the house (majority republicans) passed a bill that okayed HUGE cuts in social programs. Stuff for under achieving, less funded schools, and some other pretty important stuff that I wish I could remember. Most inner city poorly funded schools around me have majority non white kids in them, idk how it is other places, but I dont really see how thats helping African Americans.

i wasnt even paying attention to this thread but......the reason Bush and the NAACP dont get along is cause they called him stupid. Are you gonna help an org that called you stupid?

Bone Collecta
06-26-2005, 02:53 AM
Umm, no offense Bone, cuz we both from HBHH, but I really TRULY know how the Democratic party works. Both my parents are DEEPLY rooted in local politics, and they are both Democrats. That includes my dad, who did REAL work for the Civil Rights Movement, though BOTH of them are far from racist, and raised me as such.

That said, the Democratic party is DEFINITELY anti-racism, moreso than the Republican party, not just in preach, but in practice too. In NYC, it has passed tangible legislation that HELPS BLACKS, and I know full well that both my parents have fought racism in their time as local politicians.

Plus, I know that this applies to the national party too, because I know that the Dem. party works like a ladder, from local to less local to less local to national. Yes, parties DO CHANGE, and you CANNOT tell simply from how racist the specific administrations were to your grandmother about which parties will do the most for YOU, because party issues/goals run deeper than specific people. If you don't do what your party expects of you, then it's hard to get your bills actually passed into law.

All that said, of course there ARE many exceptions from both parties, but I'm deeply enough entwined with politics that I see the big, RECENT picture. I mean, where do you think the whole idea of affirmative action came from? Lyndon Johnson came up with the concept and pushed it strongly as president, and he was a RECENT Democrat.

Now, I welcome a response to this, but please man don't come with any stuff about the OLD party, cuz it doesn't apply, I absolutely know that much.

i wasnt payin attention, my g-ma worker through the Carte-Bush senior admins and left when clinton went into office. So i think she would know a thing or 2 about how Republicans and democrats are to you think?

Bone Collecta
06-26-2005, 02:55 AM
you know ur beloved president Clinton is fucking up cities such as Harlem? ppl who lived there their whole lives are being thrown out because the old pres lives there they wanna "improve" shit break down buildings etc.... more white ppl are moving in and there was even rumors of tearing down the apollo -_-

seems like hes really helping blck ppl huh?

whitey
06-26-2005, 02:38 PM
you know ur beloved president Clinton is fucking up cities such as Harlem? ppl who lived there their whole lives are being thrown out because the old pres lives there they wanna "improve" shit break down buildings etc.... more white ppl are moving in and there was even rumors of tearing down the apollo -_-

seems like hes really helping blck ppl huh?

hes making it a better place.


i dont see the problem.


do good in school, go to college, get a good job and be able to live there, fuck is wrong with that.

whitey
06-26-2005, 02:40 PM
i wasnt even paying attention to this thread but......the reason Bush and the NAACP dont get along is cause they called him stupid. Are you gonna help an org that called you stupid?

if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck....

Bone Collecta
06-26-2005, 10:07 PM
hes making it a better place.


i dont see the problem.


do good in school, go to college, get a good job and be able to live there, fuck is wrong with that.
lol hes destroying historical places that are important to the black culture like the apollo lol im not gonna let that be torn down

whitey
06-26-2005, 10:18 PM
^ Certain things are historical monuments and should not be torn down. That could be considered one of them. But for the rest of Harlem, a place which ive never been, I do not know how nice looking of a place it is. I cant really say either way, but what would be that problem making it look nicer?

Bone Collecta
06-26-2005, 10:24 PM
lol they making the ppl who work hard for their homes.......homeless

repo
06-26-2005, 10:29 PM
fuck gentrification

whitey
06-26-2005, 11:18 PM
lol they making the ppl who work hard for their homes.......homeless

im sure they aint gonna just give em the boot and a cardboard box and say have a good one. there has to be some compinsation involved there.

repo
06-26-2005, 11:21 PM
im sure they aint gonna just give em the boot and a cardboard box and say have a good one. there has to be some compinsation involved there.
i will tell you exactly what they are going to do

they're going to put their apartments "under new management" or have new regulations, run background checks and credit checks on their tenants and if they pass they can stay, if they can afford the inflated rent, otherwise you get 30 days to move out

kell16
06-26-2005, 11:31 PM
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/june2005/140605bush.jpg

A House bill has been introduced that would change the 22nd amendment and enable George Bush to remain President for the rest of his political life.

The bill would repeal limitations on a President holding office for a maximum of two terms.

An even darker scenario, Arnold Schwarzenegger is elected as President in 2008 and shorty after the 22nd amendment is abolished, making the Hitler admirer our permanent Fuhrer.

This is the modern day version of the Enabling Act (http://www.govsux.com/enable.htm), which allowed Hitler to officially declare himself dictator.

The bill, which can be found at the Library of Congress website here (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:), reads as follows.

----------------------------------

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)

HJ 24 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. J. RES. 24
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article --

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.'.

------------------------------

The 22nd amendment as reprinted on the Find Law Website (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment22/) reads as follows.

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.


Annotations
Limitation of Presidential Terms

''By reason of the lack of a positive expression upon the subject of the tenure of the office of President, and by reason of a well-defined custom which has risen in the past that no President should have more than two terms in that office, much discussion has resulted upon this subject. Hence it is the purpose of this . . . [proposal] . . . to submit this question to the people so they, by and through the recognized processes, may express their views upon this question, and if they shall so elect, they may . . . thereby set at rest this problem.'' 1
"not if i have anything to say about it!!"

grabs sniper rifle and attaches silencer*

*during the announcing of the bill passing, man climbs 20 floors to reach open window*

ya'll know the rest

whitey
06-26-2005, 11:47 PM
hah last were gonna hear from you.


neighbors gonna say they saw a couple of men in black suits drag this dude out his house.

whitey
06-26-2005, 11:47 PM
i will tell you exactly what they are going to do

they're going to put their apartments "under new management" or have new regulations, run background checks and credit checks on their tenants and if they pass they can stay, if they can afford the inflated rent, otherwise you get 30 days to move out

are they upgrading the place?

or just leaving as is?

repo
06-26-2005, 11:50 PM
are they upgrading the place?

or just leaving as is?
gentrification? always you tear down the hood and put up the cookie cutter condos switching the $500/mo places for $2000/mo places, put some nice shops and movie theaters, finally pave the streets right and put up some decent lighting

it happens all around dallas, i can see clinton doing it to NYC also to help for her 08 presidential bid ... make the rich people happy and pretend the poor people don't exist and it's all good, thats what you need to win an election

whitey
06-26-2005, 11:58 PM
its not really a bad thing to upgrade a neighborhood persay.


but it is rough on the peoples hood it used to be.

repo
06-27-2005, 12:03 AM
yea where do THEY go?

why cant they improve the neighborhood around the residents? that's not the point! the point is to bring in the people who have money in order to displace those that don't. yeah i know i'm paranoid, see an agenda in everything, but that's real!

the streets will only get paved right and the lighting will only be put in so long as rich people live there

they dont give a shit about the rest of us ... we dont have a voice .... i got out of there because i was able to move in with a relative who is doing ok for herself ... not everyone is so lucky to be able to have somewhere to go when their houses go. and compensation is in an idealist's dream, it won't happen.

RhymzaRua
06-27-2005, 12:06 AM
It's not just that Whitey, Repo knows what he's talking about. Low-income housing (poorer houses) are NECESSARY in regular city societies, because otherwise, where ARE the poor people gonna live? Gentrification is not just "uprading a neighborhood".

That said, what does President Clinton's having an office in Harlem have to do with that? The gentrification going on there is not HIS fault, and I'm sure it's not HIM asking for the Apollo to be torn down.

repo
06-27-2005, 12:12 AM
what she is talking about, but yeah

Bone Collecta
06-27-2005, 12:58 AM
It's not just that Whitey, Repo knows what he's talking about. Low-income housing (poorer houses) are NECESSARY in regular city societies, because otherwise, where ARE the poor people gonna live? Gentrification is not just "uprading a neighborhood".

That said, what does President Clinton's having an office in Harlem have to do with that? The gentrification going on there is not HIS fault, and I'm sure it's not HIM asking for the Apollo to be torn down.
Since hes moved there its seemed "ok" now for other white ppl to go there now more white ppl are moving in while blacks are being forced to move out.

Lol compensation? yeah right lol. thats a funny one.

Sicka than aidZ
06-27-2005, 01:18 AM
im sure they aint gonna just give em the boot and a cardboard box and say have a good one. there has to be some compinsation involved there.lol^^^cardboard box shit.....i dont even think they'd waist there time with the cardboard,...they'll give families an tenants to boot......way back, i forgot who was promised 40 acres and a mule but they didnt get shit an to this day I think it's a promise...fuck those mutherfuckers.

i guess comparing a cardboard house to 40 acres and a mule is whatever, a bad example......weren't all americans promised mules and acres...or was it the indians or the blacks? i forgot

Bone Collecta
06-27-2005, 04:20 PM
The Cherokee were promised the state of Georgia back in the Civil War days they took back what they said after some of the Cherokee fought for the south and some fought for the north.

Blacks were offered the 40 acres and a mule im still waiting on mine.




Its Native American not Indians indians live in asia

I-Legit
06-27-2005, 04:22 PM
The Cherokee were promised the state of Georgia back in the Civil War days they took back what they said after some of the Cherokee fought for the south and some fought for the north.

Blacks were offered the 40 acres and a mule im still waiting on mine.




Its Native American not Indians indians live in asia lol i know..people think they have Indian in them.....when its Native American

pep
10-31-2005, 07:26 PM
Why hasn't anyone assasinated him yet?power g, say what you will about him, duke roll with the force

TeknicelStylez
10-31-2005, 07:34 PM
lol, it could happen

no doh t arnie will run for president one day and you dumb yanks will vote him in

he loves the nazis too, would love a world government im sureSTFU

I hate that yankee shit, wtf is this fuckin 1800's. I'ma start calling europeans Red Coats. Wtf is wrong with you people.

Sun Tzu, Tha Soul Controllah
10-31-2005, 07:35 PM
this is months old

crass
10-31-2005, 07:37 PM
yeah stop bringing this shit back