PDA

View Full Version : 2 great presidents of the U.S.


diggy
01-03-2009, 06:23 PM
PLEASE READ





Assassinated for the cause of justice


by Melvin Sickler
__________
______

Both Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy were assassinated while they held the high office of President of the United States. Both of these former presidents had also created their own money system to run the United States while they were in office is this just a coincidence?

Why assassinate a President? Why must everything be kept so covered up? What are they trying to hide from the American people?
The facts will speak for themselves.

Abraham Lincoln
During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point hi wrote:

"... (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts..."

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them "Greenbacks".

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a bebt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service empoyees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, "The London Times" printed the following:

"if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing, I repeat, the only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers.

In retaliation
After this was published in "The London Times", the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed.

They were stopped by two things.
First, Lincoln knew the British people, and he knew that Britain would not support slavery, so hi issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that slavery in the United States was abolished. At this point, the London Bankers could not openly support the Confederacy because the British people simply would not stand for their country supporting slavery.

Second, the Czar of Russia sent a portion of the Russian navy to the United states with orders that its admiral would operate under the command of Abraham Lincoln. These ships of the Russian navy then became a threat to the ships of the British navy which had intended to break the blockade and help the South.

The North won the War, and the Union was preserved. America remained as one nation.

Of course, the Bankers were not going to give in that easy, for they were determined to put an end to Lincoln's interest-free, debt-free Greenbacks. He was assassinated by an agent of the Bankers shortly after the War ended.

Thereafter, Congress revoked the Greenback Law and enacted, in its place, the National Banking Act. The national banks were to be privately owned and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest-bearing. The Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes.

In 1972, the United States Treasury Department was asked to compute the amount of interest that would have been paid if that 400 million dollars would have been borrowed at interest instead of being issued by Abraham Lincoln. They did some computations, and a few weeks later, the United States Treasury Department said the United States Government saved 4 billion dollars in interest because Lincoln had created his own money. So you can about imagine how much the Government has paid and how much we owe solely on the basis of interest.

The Federal Reserve Act
There were changes in the money and banking laws for the next fifty years. Finally, in 1913, the Bankers were able to get their Federal Reserve Act passed through Congress which replaced the National Banking Act that had earlier replaced the Greenback Law. If the Government would have continued the policy of Abraham Lincoln, the warnings given in "The London Times" would have come to pass. America would be a debt-free nation, the most prosperous in the world. And the brains and the wealth of the world would have come to America.

But with this Federal Reserve Act being passed, Congress gave up its power to create its own money that it was given in the United States Constitution, and gave this power over to private Bankers who called themselves the Federal Reserve. The Bankers had achieved their ultimate goal, for now the United States operated under a central bank that was privately owned. They now had the power to run the country by controlling the creation of the money, and were free to charge the interest they so desired.

As Mayer Anselm Rothschild once said: "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws..."

John F. Kennedy
No United States president since Abraham Lincoln dared to go against the system and create his own money, as many of these so-called elected presidents were actually only instruments or puppets of the Bankers. That is until President John F. Kennedy came into office.

President Kennedy was not afraid to "buck the system", for he understood how the Federal Reserve System was being used to destroy the United States. As a just and honorable man, he could not tolerate such a system, for it smelled corruption from A to Z. Certainly he must have known about the Greenbacks which Abraham Lincoln created when he was in office.

On June 4th, 1963, President Kennedy signed a presidential document, called Executive Order 11110, which further amended Executive order 10289 of September 19th, 1951. This gave Kennedy, as President of the United States, legal clearance to create his own money to run the country, money that would belong to the people, an interest and debt-free money. He had printed United States Notes, completely ignoring the Federal Reserve Notes from the private banks of the Federal Reserve.

Our records show that Kennedy issued $4,292,893,825 of cash money. It was perfectly obvious that Kennedy was out to undermine the Federal Reserve System of the United States.

But it was only a few months later, in November of 1963, that the world received the shocking news of President Kennedy's assassination. No reason was given, of course, for anyone wanting to commit such an atrocious crime. But for those who knew anything about money and banking, it did not take long to put the pieces of the puzzle together. For surely, President Kennedy must have had it in mind to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and return back to the United States Congress the power to create its own money.

It is interesting to note that, only one day after Kennedy's assassination, all the United States notes which Kennedy had issued were called out of circulation. Was this through an executive order of the newly-installed president, Lyndon B. Johnson? Or was he one of their instruments? At any rate, all of the money President Kennedy had created was destroyed. And not a word was said to the American people.

A lesson to learn
There is much that can be learned from our past history. Here we are in 1997 , and the United States is still operating under the Federal Reserve System. It has already plunged our country over four trillion dollars into debt, a debt it will never be able to pay, and has been responsible for every kind corruption imaginable. Yet, barely a peep of protest can be heard from the American people.

All The Bankers have to do to keep their power is to get rid of the few politicians who are honestly working for a reform in our economic system, and the people at large remain ignorant and controlled. It is obvious the American people need to be awakened to the truth.

The population at large must be educated on the Federal Reserve, and then unite together to put pressure on the Government to get the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 repealed. Otherwise, it will spell disaster for the United States.

There can be no peace witout justice, and there can be no justice without a reform in our economic system, for the financiers are behind all the corruption in our Government.

Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy both had the courage to stand up for principles and to fight for justice. They have both gone down in history as being true patriots of the United States. But do we, as citizens, have the courage to follow their example?




http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/pres.htm

Edgar Erebus
01-03-2009, 09:50 PM
Not quite insightful, and it's credibility is quite shaken by the horrible grammar mistake he does each time when he uses third-person singular pronoun.

hectis
01-03-2009, 11:50 PM
JFK was not a great president

oDoUoSoKo
01-04-2009, 12:09 AM
Martin Van Buren, and Jimmy Carter.....>>>ALL OPPOSITION.

diggy
01-04-2009, 12:28 AM
JFK was not a great president


Why do you say that?

oDoUoSoKo
01-04-2009, 12:36 AM
cuz his airport SUCKS. eloels.

Koolish
01-04-2009, 12:47 AM
Not quite insightful, and it's credibility is quite shaken by the horrible grammar mistake he does each time when he uses third-person singular pronoun.
fuck the grammar, so long as the rationality is good the spelling shouldn't be a question about how smart a person is.

it makes sense to me though, but coincidence is a word that you could slap right on it.

they say that money is the root of all evil, so it makes sense that private powerful bankers would be the most evil, or just evil as a fact.

hectis
01-04-2009, 12:51 AM
Why do you say that?

what did he do that was so good?

diggy
01-04-2009, 12:52 AM
what did he do that was so good?

Read the article and you will know.

diggy
01-04-2009, 12:54 AM
Not quite insightful, and it's credibility is quite shaken by the horrible grammar mistake he does each time when he uses third-person singular pronoun.


Bad grammar does not discredit information. You're just being disagreeable.

:nonono:

hectis
01-04-2009, 12:58 AM
I will give you good, but not great

food for thought
01-04-2009, 01:00 AM
JFK was prolly as good a president as you can get

not counting the would be greats like Ralph Nader and Ron Paul

TSA
01-04-2009, 01:38 AM
Nadar and Ron Paul would have been shitty presidents because they're ideologs and can't build support.

A presidents ideas don't mean shit, a president with no ideas is best, a president has to be less of a dreamer and more of a math problem solver

Edgar Erebus
01-04-2009, 07:15 AM
Bad grammar does not discredit information. You're just being disagreeable.

:nonono:

It does, I'm quite reluctant to accept knowledge from someone who obviously didn't even learn how is "he" spelt.

But, anyway, dude simply doesn't know where does printing money whenever you need it, without any debt, lead. No wonder they renounced both of those laws, otherwise you end up like Germany in 1923. If you don't know what I'm saying, do your history.

Art Vandelay
01-04-2009, 07:22 PM
i'm sure john wilkes booth, a theater actor from maryland, was concerned about the printing of new treasury notes. i'm sure it had nothing to do with freeing "niggers" and giving them the right to vote

Bobby Budknickers
01-04-2009, 07:28 PM
i swear i've read in a couple different places that Lincoln actually wanted to send the slaves back where they came from. not sure if it's true, but yeah.



and Polk was the best president.
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e286/devilntheflesh85/albundy-2-1.jpg

Olive Oil Goombah
01-04-2009, 07:30 PM
JFK was prolly as good a president as you can get

not counting the would be greats like Ralph Nader and Ron Paul

Oh ok. So your THAT guy. it all makes sense now.

i'm sure john wilkes booth, a theater actor from maryland, was concerned about the printing of new treasury notes. i'm sure it had nothing to do with freeing "niggers" and giving them the right to vote

No, it was the Jews fault. There's an unreferenced and unsupported article about it on page 8 with numerous grammatical errors throughout that tells the whole truth behind the incident.




Most influential or the Greatest Humanitarian or what???


Jeffereson, Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR.

JKF is not on that level imo

Art Vandelay
01-04-2009, 07:43 PM
i swear i've read in a couple different places that Lincoln actually wanted to send the slaves back where they came from. not sure if it's true, but yeah.



and Polk was the best president.
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e286/devilntheflesh85/albundy-2-1.jpg

no, that was james monroe. slaves were returned to liberia. the town of monrovia, liberia is named after him.

LORD NOSE
01-05-2009, 02:03 PM
where is that kennedy lincoln link ?


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/John_F._Kennedy%2C_White_House_photo_portrait%2C_l ooking_up.jpg/150px-John_F._Kennedy%2C_White_House_photo_portrait%2C_l ooking_up.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_F._Kennedy,_White_House_photo_portrait,_ looking_up.jpg) http://upload.wikimedia.org/skins/common/images/magnify-clip.png (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_F._Kennedy,_White_House_photo_portrait,_ looking_up.jpg)
John F. Kennedy


An example of a shorter version of the list is presented here for illustration. Much of the list has been debunked, and some entries are outright falsehoods. Some urban folklorists have postulated that the list provided a way for people to make sense of two tragic events in American history by seeking out patterns.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Kennedy_coincidences_urban_legend#cite_not e-snopes-3) However, as Gardner and others have pointed out, it is relatively easy to find seemingly meaningful patterns relating any two people or events, but such patterns often do not stand up to rigorous scrutiny.

Both presidents were elected to the presidency in '60.
Both presidents were elected to the United States House of Representatives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives) in '46.
Both were runners-up for the party's nomination for vice-president in '56.
Both assassins were born in '39.
Both successors were Southern Democrats named Johnson born in '08.
Both presidents were concerned with the problems of American blacks and made their view strongly known in '63. Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation) in 1862, which became law in 1863. In 1963, Kennedy presented his reports to Congress on Civil Rights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights), and the same year was the famous March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_on_Washington_for_Jobs_and_Freedom).
Both presidents were shot in the head.
Both presidents were shot in presence of their wives.
Both presidents were shot on a Friday.
Lincoln was shot at Ford's Theatre (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford%27s_Theatre). Kennedy was shot in a Ford (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Motor_Company) car; a Lincoln limousine.
Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy who told him not to go to the theatre. Kennedy had a secretary named Evelyn Lincoln (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Lincoln) (whose husband Harold's nickname was Abe), and she warned him not to go to Dallas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas).
Both Oswald and Booth were assassinated before they could be put on trial.
Lincoln and Kennedy each have 7 letters.
John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald each have 15 letters.
There are 6 letters in each Johnson's first name.
Booth shot Lincoln in a theater and hid in a warehouse, while Oswald shot Kennedy from a warehouse and hid in a theater.
Both presidents married women who could speak French (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_language).Some of the items above are true, such as the year in which Kennedy and Lincoln were each elected President, but this is not so unusual given that Presidential elections are held only every four years, and both started their political careers 100 years apart. Other items twist the truth. John Wilkes Booth was shot by a trooper during efforts to capture him - hardly an assassination. Some of the items are simply untrue; there is no record to show that Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy; Lincoln's secretaries were John Hay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hay) and John G. Nicolay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Nicolay)[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Kennedy_coincidences_urban_legend#cite_not e-snopes-3). The version cited at Snopes.com (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com) also concludes with an untrue joke item: "A month before Lincoln was assassinated he was in Monroe, Maryland (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monroe,_Maryland&action=edit&redlink=1); a month before Kennedy was assassinated he was in Marilyn Monroe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Monroe)." In fact, Marilyn Monroe died more than a year before Kennedy was killed.

food for thought
01-05-2009, 02:14 PM
Oh ok. So your THAT guy. it all makes sense now.



your old ass having problems with your comprehension skills or wat?

faggot.

Olive Oil Goombah
01-05-2009, 02:16 PM
your old ass having problems with your comprehension skills or wat?

faggot.

nah i understand what you are completely. WIth age comes wisdom.

food for thought
01-05-2009, 02:22 PM
thats what puzzles me about you. u aint got none

whats your wisdom? u want u and your family to be safe from terrorrists?

ure not wise, ure simple.

dont even bother replying, i aint trying to talk to your lame ass


faggot.

Olive Oil Goombah
01-05-2009, 02:23 PM
u keep saying that. your too angry to stop replying to me.

food for thought
01-05-2009, 02:52 PM
Nadar and Ron Paul would have been shitty presidents because they're ideologs and can't build support.

A presidents ideas don't mean shit, a president with no ideas is best, a president has to be less of a dreamer and more of a math problem solver

whats wrong with ideals?

and if the people supported Nader and Ron Paul, politicians would have to support to them. thats why third parties are essential

i think a president needs to be a thinker as well as a math solver. whats wrong with ideas?