PDA

View Full Version : "The End of Democracy" by Dr. Ian Dallas


Cee Oh Vee
05-14-2009, 04:43 PM
To the great uneducated masses, democracy means universal franchise free to pick its governing institution divided into two or more opposing parties. The media instructed technical class also adhere to the creed that government should not interfere with the market – the market being corporation-controlled distribution and free markets meaning it is forbidden to inhibit global spread of corporation over private entity. Wealth is not governed. Wealth does not spend itself on people. The people pay for everything and are taxed for everything they buy or drive or fly.

Now the wealth system has collapsed, irretrievably and rationally. It is the people who are ordered to pay the billions required to restore wealth to the wealthy. This operation can only be accomplished by persuading the masses that in fact the operation is a rescue from poverty not a recipe of endebtment.

In Visconti’s film masterpiece of Lampedusa’s novel, ‘The Leopard’, the politics of power are laid bare. The underlying law of governance is defined: “For things to remain the same, everything must change.”

If the financial system has collapsed then it means the democratic system has collapsed, democracy’s function having been to separate government (controlling the masses) from ‘market’, that is, commodity wealth – money itself, while worthless intrinsically, having become a traded commodity.

By 2005 the monks of the banking/investment orders knew that the inescapable end-game of futures and hedge-fund systems was reaching mathematical meltdown. This meant that democracy needed a mandate for the masses which could offer hope, salvation, rescue and business as usual – in short, the dream would not die.

With superb expertise the stage was prepared for the dream-regime, the dream leader and the brilliant delusion of turning the end into the semblance of the beginning.

The ‘policy' of this renewal was only one word. Why not? Millions had died and been displaced in Iraq with only three letters – W.M.D.

The political mantra was announced: “Change.”

However, it may be that in the great nature of this upheaval it will not be ‘their’ business that is renewed – but rather, that the whole system, money and its personnel – will all be swept away. ‘Their’ change will not grant them a sameness.

The Second Hundred Years War that started with the politicisation of wealth in South Africa in 1910, (the ‘solution’ of Dominion), finally has come to an end.

It has been the era of the political class. The era of the rule by the servants of the banking elite who, not the universal franchise, empowered them.

No concocted mathematical (“economic”) rescue package can succeed – because the epoch of democratic governance cannot be rescued. Banking cannot work without democracy. However, the crisis in the political class is greater than that of finance.

Now we know that paper money does not function – we also know that democratic personnel do not function either. It is over. It is over. It is over.

Let us look out on the terrain.

In Kenya – two party politicians claim the Presidency. In order to win it they both let their own people slaughter each other by tens of thousands. It is still unresolved.

In Zimbabwe – a half-crazed President (“Zimbabwe is mine”) embodying socialist politics in pure form, battles the opponent, he in turn, the appointee of American investment. Their refusal to collaborate has produced million dollar inflation and a cholera epidemic with over 1000 dead.

In Bangladesh – two militant Begums battle for power, their policies identical – they have paralysed the country for a decade.

In Greece – two parties locked in conflict for two decades, the socialist Papandreou team cursing the monetarist Karamanlis team. Now Greece approaches civil war.

It should be noted that the party-system tends to produce an abortive monarchism sustaining a low DNA-structured leadership – Roosevelts, Kennedys, Bushes in the key Republican state.

Blatant non-functioning of the party system democracy is said to be because the country is immature, but that cannot be sustained when you regard the European Union.

Britain’s Prime Minister forced not only the country but the government itself into a war neither wanted. The present holder of the office has never been chosen by the electorate, that itself is a disgrace given the dictatorial powers achieved by his predecessor.

Blair was seriously in need of psycho-analysis. Brown is even more insecure as a Premier. He is almost totally blind. Visiting heads of state are asked not to offer their hands first in greeting as he may miss it. His corsets do not inspire confidence. His upper dentures do not meet his lower dentures. He has some mysterious disability which results in an uncontrollable dropping of his jaw. The pursed lips of his smile suggest job losses more than pleasure. From the fear dilated eyes of Blair to the blindness of Brown, however, the defining word is not ugliness. It is inadequacy. Democratic leaders are not fit for high office. This is now axiomatic. Inadequate. Brown – inadequate. Bush – inadequate. Merkel – inadequate. Zapatero – inadequate.

How does this inadequacy manifest?

Well! When the complete financial system and its institutions collapsed at the end of 2007 – the political leadership not only were surprised, they actually denied it at first. They openly stated they did not know HOW it had happened. They offered no solution. They adopted the bankers’ (the bankrupted bankers!) recommendation.

But there is a much graver inadequacy. The worst aspect of the political class is its cowardice, coupled with its supreme indifference to the slaughter of its own young men in useless wars.

The refusal of a government to go to the front-line in the event of a war, led by its President and first ministers, should result in their overthrow or national and military mutiny. They endlessly belittle the personal rule of the Monarch – but the Monarch led the war and so did not squander generations as Asquith, Lloyd George, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Blair and Bush have done. Killers and cowards. What more sickening sight in the world than Blair and Bush visiting Iraqi soldiers, or Brown visiting Afghanistan. No wonder the French soldier turned away from President Sarkozy as he laid medals on the coffins flown into Paris from Afghanistan.

“Our boys at the front – being killed!”

Our politicians at the back – getting rich!

It is over. This is the only positive result of the Gaza Massacre.

There is one other important imbalance – inhumanity in the political class. Wagner said that politics robbed a woman of her power as a woman. She was required to de-womanise – become a pseudo-man. The very vital and sublime aspects of womanhood, her life-confirming force, her compassion, her motherhood, her daughterhood, her wifehood, her wisdom and her sense of reality – all these have to be smothered if she is to enter the political class.

It is not an accident, and certainly not a fashion choice, that forces political women into trans-vestism.

The pant-suit as it is called is the male-impersonator’s obligatory uniform in the world of politics. From the US Secretary of State to the Chancellor of Germany it represents a mandatory negation of feminism.

In relation to this the banking elite is an all-male preserve with only one important top-level woman banker – both her previous husbands (perhaps to her credit) having died mysteriously.

Mockery of politicians is not intended to be frivolous. It is to emphasise that no small business, let alone a corporation, would dream of employing them in a responsible role. Politicians are the lowest creatures of the species. Neither they nor their national nor their international institutions could halt the Gaza Massacre. They could not mention the loss of hundreds of Palestinians without alongside it measuring the handful of Israeli dead. No one dared to say the ratio of human dead at one to a hundred was a terminal disaster to the social nexus. Suspension from the U.N.O.? Sanctions against Israel? No. The politicians do not represent the people. They are the servants of the banks.

Is it to remain like this? Or is there to be a change? And that brings us to Barak Obama. What a brilliant piece of casting. It is truly Oscar material.

Nothing is what it seems.

The name is Muslim. The religion is evangelical christian. He calls himself black. His mother was white. He is a kind of political Michael Jackson. The record label in both cases is jewish.

“For things to remain the same – everything must change.”

The myth that the American Dream (who invented that?) might continue – the proof had come – a black President.

The truth – the historical truth of America has not and cannot be confronted, just as South Africa’s new regime cannot confront its truth.

Barak Obama is not black. He is brown. The christian state could not survive its own cultural inheritance. The Southerners were ashamed of what they called miscegenation. The Oxford Dictionary defines it: “Miscegenation – mixture of races, esp. the sexual union of whites with negroes.” Equally, the protestant christian Afrikaners were ashamed. The segregation was the futile attempt to prevent the nordic whites breeding with the blacks. It was sinful! In its first context it was the scenario of race superiority. Today we face a new scientific ethos. The black and the nordic races are both in genetic decline. The vast HIV-hyphen-AIDS politique hides the genetic breakdown of black communities. On the other hand – the (apartheid designated) ‘mixed’ race thrives, superior to both its favoured neighbours, leaders in sport and in intellect. In the modern world the ‘brown’ child of ‘mixed’ parentage represents a genetic rescue partnership producing a new, dynamic and superior generation – or re-generation. The failure to face up to this is dooming South Africa to a black empowerment doctrine (which cuts out the still ‘shamed’ coloureds) that has had to lower not only academic standards, university admission and medical qualifications, but airline pilot exam standards!

In the USA the never-confronted issue of the politically but not economically freed slaves hid the deepest perhaps incurable wound – unless rescued by Islam – that the new population of the future was brown babies. The language of Afro-American politics is the language of a failed state. The USA was a state that in 1861, according to the Oxford Dictionary, was a nation talking of its citizens as: “‘Octoroons’ – a person having one-eighth negro blood, the offspring of a quadroon and a white.” The USA was the father of Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa. And nothing has changed – but now we are told by the politicians “change is coming.”

Change by a man who cannot deny white and black in order to declare the genetic good news, or the political good news that he is neither jew nor christian, but the son of a Muslim? Alas. He has donned the jewish cap, kneeling in the racist christian church – “For things to remain the same.”

He has expressed his “grave concern” for Palestinian and Israeli loss of life. That is the mantra of the jewish French President, the jewish French Foreign Minister and the jewish English Foreign Minister. It is the mantra of Obama’s brilliant ex-Israeli Chief of Staff. A real man would say that massacre of 100 for 1 is a pagan brutality and to accept it is the end of our whole society.

The war against Palestine by Israel is not judaism versus Islam. Israel’s holy city is New York and Hamas’ holy city is Kerbala, but Israel is killing Palestinians to prevent the destruction of Israeli jewry by Arab blood. It is not their rockets or their tunnels that they fear, it is their penis and their womb. They fear that the quadroon will give way to the octoroon, and racist jewry will disappear forever as it is already disappearing, despite Hollywood, in the USA.

If Barak Obama cannot open the gates of reality in Israel what chance will he have to be able to open the gates of poverty in the USA – to let its black and brown population into the white bedroom of the future?

For such a transvaluation of values Barak Obama would need to enter Islam. That would be renewal. All we will have is “change.”

Cee Oh Vee
05-15-2009, 06:31 AM
It transpires that many users of this forum who have 'viewed' this thread without reading the article, rather note the length of it, and go to something else.

I find it most interesting, given the title.

With all that said; I highly recommend at least skim reading it.

Peace.

diggy
05-15-2009, 02:44 PM
Cee, please read the sticky about effective communication:

http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74877

Visionz
05-15-2009, 03:15 PM
this is a good read.....people that see 10 or so paragraphs and think "there's no way I'm reading all that" should wonder what happened to us to have such short fuckin attention spans in the first place.

BornPower
05-15-2009, 03:20 PM
It transpires that many users of this forum who have 'viewed' this thread without reading the article, rather note the length of it, and go to something else.

I find it most interesting, given the title.

With all that said; I highly recommend at least skim reading it.

Peace.

Cee, please read the sticky about effective communication:

http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74877

this is the sad case with many (in RL, not just this forum). I liked parts of it and I fail to see America allowing another system to function here. Those in power denied the problem first and now are investigating ways to keep the status quo AND keep the populace in check. If we want to change the corrupt system then we will need to make not just a show of force or march on it...we will need to shed some blood. how likely is that?

diggy
05-15-2009, 04:27 PM
this is a good read.....people that see 10 or so paragraphs and think "there's no way I'm reading all that" should wonder what happened to us to have such short fuckin attention spans in the first place.


Don't be so quick to pass judgement. I am usually on Wucorp from 11:00pm-1:00am, which is not a good piece of time to read extensive articles cuz I am tired at that time.

Anyways, there are some good points in that sticky about effective communication!

I am about to read the article now.

diggy
05-15-2009, 04:48 PM
It transpires that many users of this forum who have 'viewed' this thread without reading the article, rather note the length of it, and go to something else.

I find it most interesting, given the title.

With all that said; I highly recommend at least skim reading it.

Peace.


It is interesting.

What is the link of this article?

Sky Blue Danny Kid
05-15-2009, 05:21 PM
I find it somewhat troubling that our "moderate mod" described this article that uses the term "Jewish" as a poignant insult as "a good read".

The fact that KTL is seriously debating the idea that "Jews are destroying democracy", which is the unspoken underlying theme, is also troubling.

And just for the record, the Sarkozy is not Jewish and has been critical of Israel. His mother is 1/2 Jewish and did not practice herself.

I do not support Israel's actions toward the Palestinians, nor do I support the Palestinians' actions.

But it is interesting that hateful, baseless accusations are tolerated, so long as they are presented in article form, and directed at the right group. (Whites, Jews, Catholics, Christians)

diggy
05-15-2009, 05:27 PM
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=%22The+End+of+Democracy%22+by+Dr.+Ian+Dallas&meta=&btnG=Google+Search

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=+Dr.+Ian+Dallas&btnG=Search&meta=

Cee Oh Vee
05-15-2009, 06:09 PM
Link to the article:

http://www.shaykhabdalqadir.com/content/articles/Art088_07012009.html

It may now be necessary to add that Ian Dallas is the given name of Scottish-born Abdalqadir as-Sufi.

I will be happy to pass on any more information if required.

Peace.

Visionz
05-15-2009, 06:57 PM
Don't be so quick to pass judgement. I am usually on Wucorp from 11:00pm-1:00am, which is not a good piece of time to read extensive articles cuz I am tired at that time.

Anyways, there are some good points in that sticky about effective communication!

I am about to read the article now.
I wasn't talking about anyone specifically....the reaction I'm talking about is typical. I put it there for motivation to who-ever to read what's there.
peace man

Visionz
05-15-2009, 07:03 PM
I find it somewhat troubling that our "moderate mod" described this article that uses the term "Jewish" as a poignant insult as "a good read".

The fact that KTL is seriously debating the idea that "Jews are destroying democracy", which is the unspoken underlying theme, is also troubling.

And just for the record, the Sarkozy is not Jewish and has been critical of Israel. His mother is 1/2 Jewish and did not practice herself.

I do not support Israel's actions toward the Palestinians, nor do I support the Palestinians' actions.

But it is interesting that hateful, baseless accusations are tolerated, so long as they are presented in article form, and directed at the right group. (Whites, Jews, Catholics, Christians)
my vote in the poll: agree with some of it, there's are good point in the article in relation to crumbling democracys on a global scale and the rich relying on the poor for continued bail-outs.

An evil banker that happens to be jewish doesn't mean that all jews are evil. It's not a sentiment I buy into. It would be the equivalent of letting the KKK define my concept of what it means to be christian.

Cee Oh Vee
05-15-2009, 07:26 PM
I would like to note something, if I may:

The reason why Dallas spells Barack Obama's forename as 'Barak' is probably due to the fact that if one were to transliterate the arabic word بركة into English; it would not necessarily be the common practice to use 'ck', rather just the 'k', which is the arabic sound.

Peace.

RALPH WIGGUM
05-16-2009, 07:24 AM
I find it somewhat troubling that our "moderate mod" described this article that uses the term "Jewish" as a poignant insult as "a good read".

The fact that KTL is seriously debating the idea that "Jews are destroying democracy", which is the unspoken underlying theme, is also troubling.

I agree, its only believing in hate to blame judaism and call everyone you dont agree with a jew. Unfortunately, a lot of anti-semitics hide themselves behind the struggle for justice and equality. A lot of them will say they are not Atni-semitics but anti-Zionists. This is why you see so-called Black leaders allying themselves with far-right groups.


And just for the record, the Sarkozy is not Jewish and has been critical of Israel. His mother is 1/2 Jewish and did not practice herself.

I do not support Israel's actions toward the Palestinians, nor do I support the Palestinians' actions.

But it is interesting that hateful, baseless accusations are tolerated, so long as they are presented in article form, and directed at the right group. (Whites, Jews, Catholics, Christians)

True, our president is christian and doesn't hesitate to show it, which is a threat to our laic system, and the separation of Church and State.
What do you mean the Palestinians' action? The Hamas is not the Palestinians.
However I don't believe Abdalqadir as-Sufi (Ian Dallas), to be Anti-semitic. He practices sufism, an Islam based on universal love. His group, the Murabitun, is opened to people of all colors and social walks.

Sky Blue Danny Kid
05-16-2009, 08:56 AM
"Zionist" is essentially a meaningless word that people use to describe jews they don't like. Is a zionist a militant Israeli, or is a zionist anybody who recognizes Israel's right to merely exist?

When I say I don't support the Israeli's or Palestinians, let it be known that on a micro level, I believe most Israeli's and Palestinians desire a peaceful two-state solution.

However, both the Israeli's and Palestinians elected militant parties that claim to want peace but do not show it in their actions.

In fact, Hamas's political ideology is that they will not be happy until Israel ceases to exist. And they were democratically elected. How do you negotiate with that?

Also, I don't know how you can claim that Ian Dallas is not anti-semitic.

Sufism has nothing to do with it. People claim that Christianity is based on universal love, but that doesn't mean people don't use it for violence and bigotry.

RALPH WIGGUM
05-16-2009, 09:37 AM
"Zionist" is essentially a meaningless word that people use to describe jews they don't like. Is a zionist a militant Israeli, or is a zionist anybody who recognizes Israel's right to merely exist?

When I say I don't support the Israeli's or Palestinians, let it be known that on a micro level, I believe most Israeli's and Palestinians desire a peaceful two-state solution.

However, both the Israeli's and Palestinians elected militant parties that claim to want peace but do not show it in their actions.

In fact, Hamas's political ideology is that they will not be happy until Israel ceases to exist. And they were democratically elected. How do you negotiate with that?

Also, I don't know how you can claim that Ian Dallas is not anti-semitic.

Sufism has nothing to do with it. People claim that Christianity is based on universal love, but that doesn't mean people don't use it for violence and bigotry.

Israel helped the Hamas, they used the Hamas to get rid of the Fatah and of Yasser Arafat.
This is a really though situation. Because Israel was created because the European countries and the USA felt like the world had a debt toward the jewish people. And I agree that a jewish state is needed, but it was done the wrong way, it was imposed to Palestine, it was a situation that could only end up in a war, and they settled it by providing Israel with weapons, so they won the war but it could never lead to peace.
Because, as Abdalqadir as-Sufi said, its not a war between jews n muslims, its not a war about religion its a war about territory. I can't say for sure that he is not Anti-semitic, but right now its hard for me to see a Anti-semitic sufi, since its the most tolerant religion I know.
And Zionist is not meaningless, there is an agressive Zionism, represented by people like Netanyahu. But this word, as you said is used by people to only describe jews they dont like, but often because they simply don't like jews, and they use this word as racist politicians say "I aint racist, I just dont like immigrants who do crimes", its the same racism.