PDA

View Full Version : Homophobia and mysogyny in WuCorp


Sheep Shifter
07-31-2009, 06:42 PM
Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion. I say " whatever your insecurities are" because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start with.

We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude that the White racists use against our people because they are Black and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover something that he does not have. So you're some kind of a threat to him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established norm.

Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say that we recognize the women's right to be free. We have not said much about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the most oppresed people in the society.

And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it's a phenomenon that I don't understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of capitalism. I don't know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn't view as revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot also be a revolutionary. And maybe I'm now injecting some of my prejudice by saying that "even a homosexual can be a revolutionary." Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most revolutionary.

When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations, there should be full participation of the gay liberation movement and the women's liberation movement. Some groups might be more revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because they are not.

We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have about homosexuality. When I say "insecurities," I mean the fear that they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.

We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our friends off. The terms "faggot" and "punk" should be deleted from our vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.

We should try to form a working coalition with the gay liberation and women's liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the most appropriate manner.

Discuss

Sheep Shifter
07-31-2009, 06:43 PM
- Speech given by Huey Newton, founder of the Black Panthers, August 15, 1970
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/newtonq.html

SKAMPOE
07-31-2009, 06:46 PM
Gay buttseks is gay

Drunken Monk
07-31-2009, 06:46 PM
[Revolt;1640273']Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion. I say " whatever your insecurities are" because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start with.

We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude that the White racists use against our people because they are Black and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover something that he does not have. So you're some kind of a threat to him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established norm.

Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say that we recognize the women's right to be free. We have not said much about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the most oppresed people in the society.

And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it's a phenomenon that I don't understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of capitalism. I don't know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn't view as revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot also be a revolutionary. And maybe I'm now injecting some of my prejudice by saying that "even a homosexual can be a revolutionary." Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most revolutionary.

When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations, there should be full participation of the gay liberation movement and the women's liberation movement. Some groups might be more revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because they are not.

We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have about homosexuality. When I say "insecurities," I mean the fear that they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.

We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our friends off. The terms "faggot" and "punk" should be deleted from our vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.

We should try to form a working coalition with the gay liberation and women's liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the most appropriate manner.

Discuss

ameen ahki

SHRAP
07-31-2009, 08:04 PM
[Revolt;1640273']Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion. I say " whatever your insecurities are" because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start with.

We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude that the White racists use against our people because they are Black and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover something that he does not have. So you're some kind of a threat to him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established norm.

Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say that we recognize the women's right to be free. We have not said much about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the most oppresed people in the society.

And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it's a phenomenon that I don't understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of capitalism. I don't know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn't view as revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot also be a revolutionary. And maybe I'm now injecting some of my prejudice by saying that "even a homosexual can be a revolutionary." Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most revolutionary.

When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations, there should be full participation of the gay liberation movement and the women's liberation movement. Some groups might be more revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because they are not.

We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have about homosexuality. When I say "insecurities," I mean the fear that they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.

We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our friends off. The terms "faggot" and "punk" should be deleted from our vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.

We should try to form a working coalition with the gay liberation and women's liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the most appropriate manner.

Discuss

if u wanna act like a bitch i hope u prepared to get treated like a bitch lil punk ass faggot

oDoUoSoKo
07-31-2009, 08:14 PM
if u wanna act like a bitch i hope u prepared to get treated like a bitch lil punk ass faggot
this is what u call....perfect fuckin timing....lmfao. congrats thread starter..u got urself a perfect example of a dickhead here.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 08:21 PM
^^^lol cosign

shrap's not a real person...he has no actual personality. he is a nonentity, a spineless cipher, a jellyfish that listen's to soulja boy and calls himself an og.

diggy
07-31-2009, 08:33 PM
There is no need to unite with homos and women. It's about those who are upright and those who are on all fours.

jubei
07-31-2009, 09:12 PM
[Revolt;1640273']whatever your insecurities are" because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the mouth (with surgical gloves on), and want a woman to be quiet.

Homosexuals are not enemies of the people. No they are enemies of children and civilised men/women.

We should try to form a working coalition with the gay liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the most appropriate manner.

FUCK THAT


Fuck faggots, fuck everything there about. Im insecure that my children get snatched by a faggot peadophile when im not around to put a knife in his faggot face.


A Snitch = A Faggot. A Faggot = A Peadophile.

EAGLE EYE
07-31-2009, 09:15 PM
Fuck faggots, fuck everything there about. Im insecure that my children get snatched by a faggot peadophile when im not around to put a knife in his faggot face.


A Snitch = A Faggot. A Faggot = A Peadophile.


Funny you say that. Cuz your hero MAX B in your sig is getting his shit pushed in at the pen right now.




chicka chicka chicka
HtCK9om9O08

Uncle Steezo
07-31-2009, 09:21 PM
homosexuality is unnatural. i cant support it. and my sister is gay. i love her but i dont support that devilish shit. we are obligated as the stewards of humanity to uphold nature.

you asking us to digest a poision in hope that it will make us stronger.

you got it twisted bro.



as far as women go. i am wucorps biggest female advocate.

5hundred&one
07-31-2009, 09:21 PM
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b186/SideshowBurns/gayfags-1.png

well OP, I'd imagine that the amount of homosexual references in your post is single-handedly responsible for turning this site into a giant gay advertisment.

if that's where being pro-homosexual gets you, then I think we should do away with all the faggots once and for all.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:26 PM
^^^that was quoted from huey newton almost 30 years ago...and based on the ridiculous amount of ignorance in this thread, the sentiments expressed there are just as relevant now as when he initially made those statements.

did you guys catch the link...that he is quoting a revolutionary that actually had the balls to fight for what he believed in?

5hundred&one
07-31-2009, 09:29 PM
^ wasn't he in Funkadelic?

http://blog.tilos.hu/malestripshow/FunkadelicZUncle.JamVfr.jpg

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:30 PM
how is homosexuality devilish? i'll agree that is runs contrary to our basic biological imperatives which is to reproduce to perpetuate the human race...but it's something that's existed for the entirety of human history.

and there are gay animals too. there are over 1,500 different species of animals that have been shown to exhibit gay and bisexual behavior. explain that.

diggy
07-31-2009, 09:30 PM
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b186/SideshowBurns/gayfags-1.png




^^HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAHAHA

Uncle Steezo
07-31-2009, 09:33 PM
^^^that was quoted from huey newton almost 30 years ago...and based on the ridiculous amount of ignorance in this thread, the sentiments expressed there are just as relevant now as when he initially made those statements.

did you guys catch the link...that he is quoting a revolutionary that actually had the balls to fight for what he believed in?


huey was wrong.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:33 PM
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=bisexual-species

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal.html

read more, learn more, change the globe

Uncle Steezo
07-31-2009, 09:34 PM
i am not an animal.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:36 PM
^^^humans are animals
believing anything else is just arrogance...we're not some special category of organic life different from plants or animals...we're part of the animal kingdom brah

diggy
07-31-2009, 09:37 PM
how is homosexuality devilish?...
...and there are gay animals too. there are over 1,500 different species of animals that have been shown to exhibit gay and bisexual behavior. explain that.


The above argument usually comes from gays which makes me think you are one. That would explain your encouragement of all of us to join with them.

and there are gay animals too.
There are animals that kill their young for no apparent reason, too! Is it ok for humans to kill there young for absolutely no reason?

Your thinking is flawed.

There is something wrong with a man who pushes the shit of another man deeper up his colon for pleasure.

Can you not see that?

There is some gay guy at my work. He told me he met his partner at H.S. and his partner is much older than him. Did you read that? That is fuckin pedophilia and alot of gays get into homosexuality from an older person, usually male.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:37 PM
i am not an animal.

I
AM
A
MAAAAN!

http://www.arnadal.no/film/images/elephant.jpg

great film by the way

5hundred&one
07-31-2009, 09:39 PM
vtgPAQTJLQs

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:40 PM
FMJ, you were missing my point, probably intentionally, with the animal comparison...I pointed that out to show that it is normal in the animal world, and not some distinctly human aberration...stop making straw man arguments.

the rest of your post was just bullshit, btw.

and I love the pussy...I've made threads posting naked chicks, links to pornos, so yeahbutno. I'm just capable of thinking for myself and not feeling the need to conform to the prevalent views of those around me.

diggy
07-31-2009, 09:48 PM
FMJ, you were missing my point, probably intentionally, with the animal comparison...I pointed that out to show that it is normal in the animal world, and not some distinctly human aberration...stop making straw man arguments.

No straw man argument on my part. I was asking a question.

I got your point. Pointing to homosexuality in animals does not make homosexuality in humans right is what I am saying.



How would you know homosexuality in the animal world is normal?

Could it possibly be abnormal?


the rest of your post was just bullshit, btw.

Emotional.

and I love the pussy...I've made threads posting naked chicks, links to pornos, so yeahbutno. I'm just capable of thinking for myself and not feeling the need to conform to the prevalent views of those around me.

Ya, but you stay advocating uniting wit homos.

Dr. Simon Hurt
07-31-2009, 09:59 PM
maybe normal was a poor choice of words, but again, if a trait is exhibited in over 1,500 different species then it's not some quirk or aberration...it's just something that exists.

i won't address the other stuff because I don't want to get labeled emotional because i'm aspiring to be soulless automaton; which is what's hot in the streets right now.

Steve Urkel
07-31-2009, 10:01 PM
[Revolt;1640273']Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion. I say " whatever your insecurities are" because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start with.

We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude that the White racists use against our people because they are Black and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover something that he does not have. So you're some kind of a threat to him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established norm.

Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say that we recognize the women's right to be free. We have not said much about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the most oppresed people in the society.

And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it's a phenomenon that I don't understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of capitalism. I don't know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn't view as revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot also be a revolutionary. And maybe I'm now injecting some of my prejudice by saying that "even a homosexual can be a revolutionary." Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most revolutionary.

When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations, there should be full participation of the gay liberation movement and the women's liberation movement. Some groups might be more revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because they are not.

We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have about homosexuality. When I say "insecurities," I mean the fear that they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.

We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our friends off. The terms "faggot" and "punk" should be deleted from our vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.

We should try to form a working coalition with the gay liberation and women's liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the most appropriate manner.

Discuss

faggot

diggy
07-31-2009, 10:21 PM
maybe normal was a poor choice of words, but again, if a trait is exhibited in over 1,500 different species then it's not some quirk or aberration...it's just something that exists.

Could it be possible they are like that because of man made pollutants that have gotten into the food chain?

Out of those 1500 species, how many in those species have that trait?

Is it one out of every 100 or less?

What is it?

EAGLE EYE
07-31-2009, 10:28 PM
"Sweet Christmas" this thread is really heating up

Sheep Shifter
07-31-2009, 10:29 PM
^^^that was quoted from huey newton almost 30 years ago...and based on the ridiculous amount of ignorance in this thread, the sentiments expressed there are just as relevant now as when he initially made those statements.

did you guys catch the link...that he is quoting a revolutionary that actually had the balls to fight for what he believed in?
Quoted for emphasis.

Sheep Shifter
07-31-2009, 10:31 PM
http://www.pdngallery.com/legends/archive/bingham/art/huey_newton.JPG

Uncle Steezo
07-31-2009, 10:41 PM
i don't how say this without sounding like an insult.but to claim that humans and animals are the same is ignorant or naive.

a good place for you to start is the metu neter, or if you need to hear it from a white man, socrates.

drippie k
07-31-2009, 11:20 PM
gay people are faggots

diggy
08-01-2009, 01:04 AM
http://djkonservo.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/ahmadinejad-000050.jpg

Uncle Steezo
08-01-2009, 04:43 AM
soc.rev.
you think huey would hand this dude a beret and black gloves?
7yZY6IHW4h0

Drunken Monk
08-01-2009, 04:53 AM
gay people are faggots

open ya mind

anybody can do wahteva wit his mind boddy..
respect

u are the fagg

BLACK BART SIMPSON
08-01-2009, 04:54 AM
htrQJ7G37Fo

Drunken Monk
08-01-2009, 04:55 AM
homosexuality is unnatural. i cant support it. and my sister is gay. i love her but i dont support that devilish shit. we are obligated as the stewards of humanity to uphold nature.

you asking us to digest a poision in hope that it will make us stronger.

you got it twisted bro.



as far as women go. i am wucorps biggest female advocate.

retardddddd hahahahahah

respect

Huggasaurus Sex
08-01-2009, 05:13 AM
homosexuality is unnatural. i cant support it. and my sister is gay. i love her but i dont support that devilish shit. we are obligated as the stewards of humanity to uphold nature.

you love a devil just because it dropped out of the same crotch hole? that sounds like some devil shit, fucking devil lover.

Art Vandelay
08-01-2009, 05:13 AM
LYMjXucTFaM

Inspectah_Dirk
08-01-2009, 08:13 AM
That's what you get on a forum where you got people like SKAMPOE and his alter ego Ghostlaced.

check two
08-01-2009, 02:26 PM
Like Huey said, a lot of homophobic men have insecurities about themselves, or they haven't come out of the closet yet. A lot of the homophobic people should watch American Beauty and learn the incorrect way to come out of the closet.

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-01-2009, 03:07 PM
^^^lol, that's probably true in some cases but i'm sure that alot of dudes are securely hetero and just hate gay people for whatever reason.

check two
08-01-2009, 03:18 PM
Yes, that's true, some dudes have to try to act macho at all times to try to keep up their online cred.. I mean street cred.

Inspectah_Dirk
08-01-2009, 03:25 PM
I accept homo's as they are, i'm cool with them. I understand it's not their choice (like some religious people may think, which is one of THE most stupid thought a person could have but whatever) and that they are born that way.
BUT, i think it's gross to see 2 guys or 2 (ugly) girls making out and stuff. I just don't need to see that shit.

jubei
08-01-2009, 04:46 PM
Funny you say that. Cuz your hero MAX B in your sig is getting his shit pushed in at the pen right now.
HtCK9om9O08

The Boss don Biggavell - Max B is not my hero. I put that in my sig to put people on to some good music. I listen to some stuff in peoples sig's.....

Usually when people make comments about people getting fucked in prison, its because they never been to prison, and they imagine they would let themselves get raped if they did end up in there themselves.

HANZO
08-01-2009, 09:21 PM
its funny that not accepting fags is now seen as being ignorant, close minded or jus being a closet homo. maybe in some cases a fascist.


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aIUZlzd37sI&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aIUZlzd37sI&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

pretty much sums up my view on faggots.

check two
08-01-2009, 09:29 PM
is he the guy that Mark Wahlberg(Marky Mark) used to hang out with?

DrBold241
08-01-2009, 09:36 PM
if u wanna act like a bitch i hope u prepared to get treated like a bitch lil punk ass faggot

says the motherfucker reppin souljaboy......
that's just too funny.


seriously though, you guys need to come up with better insults, faggot is just.... well it's ignorant.
you can be an asshole without looking stupid.
by that i mean witty insults.
look into it.

DrBold241
08-01-2009, 09:38 PM
open ya mind

anybody can do wahteva wit his mind boddy..
respect

u are the fagg

says the guy with the thread insulting having a sexual lifestyle.


so i guess you're kind of living to your words..... but not in the fullest.

DrBold241
08-01-2009, 09:42 PM
homosexuality is unnatural. i cant support it. and my sister is gay. i love her but i dont support that devilish shit. we are obligated as the stewards of humanity to uphold nature.

you asking us to digest a poision in hope that it will make us stronger.

you got it twisted bro.



as far as women go. i am wucorps biggest female advocate.


oh so you're just a self righteous hypocritical christian than?
i love how very few christians are actually christ-like.

YungSunny
08-02-2009, 07:12 AM
says the guy with the thread insulting having a sexual lifestyle.


so i guess you're kind of living to your words..... but not in the fullest.

Wu tangs first gay fan since bonerfarm.

SHRAP
08-02-2009, 10:31 AM
says the motherfucker reppin souljaboy......
that's just too funny.


seriously though, you guys need to come up with better insults, faggot is just.... well it's ignorant.
you can be an asshole without looking stupid.
by that i mean witty insults.
look into it.

by looking stupid do u mean looking stupid as a faggot that doesnt understand irony? enlighten us dr dick mold

Robert
08-02-2009, 11:12 AM
Homophobia is disgusting, not homosexuality.

To suggest that someone who is born a certain way is a devil is pretty fucking ridiculous.

To suggest homosexuality is "unnatural" (unlike nature) is blatantly incorrect.

Olive Oil Goombah
08-02-2009, 11:59 AM
precisely.....if only procreation is natural, than oral or anal sex is 'unnatural' and hte same person who hates on someone for being gay, why would they not hate on these things.

U could say the same for masturbation.

its dumb because a homo could still procreate if they wanted too.

PuNcH_iN_PuNcH_OuT
08-02-2009, 12:16 PM
is not homosexuals that i am afraid of

its fundamentalists that have a say in the way society runs that scares me

Sheep Shifter
08-03-2009, 12:22 AM
Bamp

Uncle Steezo
08-03-2009, 01:55 AM
oh so you're just a self righteous hypocritical christian than?
i love how very few christians are actually christ-like.

if i wanted to be christ-like i'd hang with criminals and fall in love with a whore, then get my ass kicked till i cried for my daddy like a lil bitch.

Homophobia is disgusting, not homosexuality.

To suggest that someone who is born a certain way is a devil is pretty fucking ridiculous.

To suggest homosexuality is "unnatural" (unlike nature) is blatantly incorrect.

robert once again your ability to present an opinion and defend it using sound logic and supporting evidence has me in awe. my hats off to you sir. you must have been a beast on the debate team.



nick, you know better. get down off the rainbow bandwagon before i call your father.







i guess nothing is wrong in 2009. there is a justification for any and every thing. fuck it....if it feels good, do it.

what about the dude who fucked that horse or all those women who fuck their dogs? they aren't hurting anybody. and animals have been known to have sex with animals from another species. we're animals so its perfectly natural.

i'm sure huey newton would not have wanted zoophiles persecuted like are today. and injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

The Hound
08-03-2009, 02:07 AM
Haha Diggy hates gays more than he loves life - if this guy isn't a fag who hasn't come out of the closet then Yung Sunny isn't a fucking a douchebag...doucheba

I don't care what they do but like religion sexual preference should be kept behind closed doors - Mardi Gras is a perfect example and if they want to be seen in the public eye like that then they should be able to handle criticism that comes with it.

Wu tangs first gay fan since bonerfarm.

You are 50% of Esham's fanbase. Enough from you, go do your homework or something.

Olive Oil Goombah
08-03-2009, 05:51 AM
LOL..this is diggy?

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-03-2009, 07:53 AM
style, you're comparing homosexuality to bestiality? really? i could waste time refuting it, but the fallacy speaks for itself.

DrBold241
08-03-2009, 09:04 AM
precisely.....if only procreation is natural, than oral or anal sex is 'unnatural' and hte same person who hates on someone for being gay, why would they not hate on these things.

U could say the same for masturbation.

its dumb because a homo could still procreate if they wanted too.

Homophobia is disgusting, not homosexuality.

To suggest that someone who is born a certain way is a devil is pretty fucking ridiculous.

To suggest homosexuality is "unnatural" (unlike nature) is blatantly incorrect.

is not homosexuals that i am afraid of

its fundamentalists that have a say in the way society runs that scares me

co-sign all of those.
it's human rights people, stop acting like a bunch of fucking hicks who don't know any better. this is proof how organized religion can control the gullible and insecure, and then bend their way of viewing things to the religion's will.

"it's all bullshit folks, and it's bad for ya."~ George Carlin (R.I.P)






what about the dude who fucked that horse or all those women who fuck their dogs? they aren't hurting anybody. and animals have been known to have sex with animals from another species. we're animals so its perfectly natural.




so you seriously compared homosexuality to beastiality? wow......
i take it then you don't even view homosexuals as humans than.
you really are an ignorant douche.
hostility gets us no where in this world, and if it shows when unprovoked, i believe that's actually taking steps back as a society. wise up.
the only way to keep our species thriving is to abandon these old fashion belief systems. some people are more likely to believe these children's bible stories than the cruel truth of life.
it's sad really.


tho i do believe you tried making your point that you're either not a christian or don't care to be devout, either way you're a prick.

Uncle Steezo
08-03-2009, 09:49 AM
i'm not comparing gays to zoophiles.
my point is where is the line of morality drawn?
and if its drawn right after homo, then why not push it back to include other sexual orientations?
if i loved to have sex with animals, my arguments would sound very similar to a gay persons argument.



but really what are yall arguing for?
gays are protected under ther law.
you want me to love the gay lifesytyle?
accept a gay lifestyle?
be gay?
i'm sure most of yall don't know what this thread is even about.


so lets start there.
this thread is not about civil rights.
this thread is not about gay marriage
this thread is not about gay discrimination.

what is it about?

lol @ yall getting mad and trying to force me into loving gays.
fucking fascist faggots.

some of yall like robert argued so hard on wucorp to use the word nigger but cry over hearing faggot. faggot.


see how these homos operate?


and no dr.bold i'm not a christian or a muslim or a jew. there are more religions than those 3 in this world. really you know nothing about me unless i tell you. and your assumptions show me how unexperienced you are.

Uncle Steezo
08-03-2009, 09:58 AM
its funny that the a dislike for gays is called a fear of gays.
but no other prejudice is called a phobia.

i ain't afraid of gays or being gay or being called gay. my words and actions on this site can attest to that.

its wrong. morally emotionally sexually and mentally its wrong.


if you can't accept that then you are not as open minded as you think you are.


why are you trying to align everyone's moral compass with yours?



what does wrong mean to you?
does it mean hurting/harming others?
there are many things that don't hurt anybody that are still wrong.

DrBold241
08-03-2009, 10:05 AM
what does wrong mean to you?
does it mean hurting/harming others?
there are many things that don't hurt anybody that are still wrong.


ah but this is where we hit the discussion of who are you to say whats wrong or whats right?
i personally believe what someone chooses to do behind closed doors is none of my concern, unless it's harming others....... in a literally harmful way, not playful S&M fun.
that's the point i'm trying to make, it may not be your cup of tea but that doesn't make it "wrong" per say.

oh wait..... i do think bigotry is wrong.
but then again i'm also a firm believer of peace and unity as a species and prejudice goes against that.

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-03-2009, 10:42 AM
crow, you're zoophile argument is flawed
gay sex between two consenting adults is entirely different than some guy forcing himself on a horse...you can't prove that a non-human animal is consenting or that they have any attraction to a human...it would still be considered sexual abuse by any reasonable definition because any non-human animal you can name has mental capabilities that are inferior to a human...it would be like having sex with a retarded person or with an infant.
comparing homsexuality to bestiality is a failure no matter how you spin it...it's a comedy argument.

morality is subjective anyway

"if you can't accept that it's wrong you're closed minded"---huh?

no one's trying to force you to love gays either, we're just pointing out logical flaws in your arguments. i just find it interesting that people's distaste for homosexuality can go beyond indifference...show me how someone else's sexual orientation effects you or society as a whole in an quantifiable way other than some "there's too many gays on tv and it's going to lead to more kids being gay" or something spurious like that.

DrBold241
08-03-2009, 10:45 AM
show me how someone else's sexual orientation effects you or society as a whole in an quantifiable way other than some "there's too many gays on tv and it's going to lead to more kids being gay" or something spurious like that.

logical ownage FTW!

Charles Barry
08-03-2009, 10:46 AM
I will never support homosexuality.

DrBold241
08-03-2009, 10:48 AM
^ so you support biggotry?

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-03-2009, 10:49 AM
logical ownage FTW!

unfortunately logic gets you nowhere on this forum...people will just ignore it, call you a fag, or say you're taking something seriously and displaying emotions

Charles Barry
08-03-2009, 10:57 AM
^ so you support biggotry?
Get the hell outta here with that. Whatever people do is their own business, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with it.

YungSunny
08-03-2009, 11:28 AM
Yung Sunny isn't a fucking a douchebag...

LOL a fucking douchebag.
Are we having a "who can brew the most anti-brolic insult" competition?
Aight well you're a bloody cunt. :t

The Hound
08-03-2009, 12:54 PM
We're not having any argument - you're an unfunny little bed wetter who is mad because I constantly shit on you for liking Esham whilst you should still be watching Seaseme Street.

Uncle Steezo
08-03-2009, 01:04 PM
so retards are the same as animals?
what about someone really dumb?
someone with brain damaqge from a car crash?


anyway...logic has little to do with it. there are logical reasons to do many things.if yoiu understand what logic is and what part of the mind has dominion over logic and what part is over morality.

if i have no riught to say whjat isd right or wrong then neither do you.

its slippery slopes so watch yo step.

what are you agruing for?

you can do what you want. i dont have to support it. which is all i'm saying.


ps
if a dog shows signs of pleasure and the dog re-initiates sexual interaction LOGIC dicvtates its consentual. (no fido)

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-03-2009, 01:24 PM
i don't know if a cat was walking on your keyboard while you were typing that but you might want to proofread before you post.

the only who is trying to say what's right or wrong as if it's some absolute definition is you.

and yes, i am comparing the retarded, the very young, and the brain damaged to animals in this case as they are all vastly inferior intellectually to the average adult human being and cannot be said to make educated decisions in regards to having sex with an adult human being of at least average intelligence. accept the fact that your comparison between bestiality and homosexuality missed the mark and leave it at that.

and i'll reiterate:

show me how someone else's sexual orientation effects you or society as a whole in any quantifiable way other than some "there's too many gays on tv and it's going to lead to more kids being gay" or something spurious like that.

DrBold241
08-03-2009, 04:03 PM
ooooh i know the answer!
IT DOESN'T.

YungSunny
08-03-2009, 05:19 PM
We're not having any argument - you're an unfunny little bed wetter who is mad because I constantly shit on you for liking Esham whilst you should still be watching Seaseme Street.

LOL "bed wetter" "seaseme street" "esham"

This nigga digs in the crates to find insults for the gawd. Too bad he can't koop up any grolic stew worth sniffin. Your shit is mad unoriginal. You sound like the brady bunch uncut when you insult niggas. I've seen better insults on little bill


http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:Fw8N1iVyuXSH3M:http://blackcartoons.tripod.com/bkbillschool.jpg
Speakonitgawd and bonerfarm meet littlle bill for the first time.

TheBoarzHeadBoy
08-03-2009, 08:38 PM
By not being gay you are anti gay. You can't be pro gay and not practice it. If you think its a good idea go practice it. If you don't want to practice it don't protect it. That's hippocritical.

I can't say I support Religion X if I don't practice it. If you don't follow an ideal clearly you think there's something wrong with it. I don't practice Islam because I think its a false religion. Do I hate people who follow it? No, but I'm anti Muslim. I like the people, but I dislike what they stand for.

My status on homosexuality is the same. I'm anti gay but I'm not homophobic. I don't practice it, don't understand it, and don't support it, I don't feel the need to summon rage against them or publically condemn them. I just look at them and think to myself "It doesn't make sense, I want no part in it, but it wouldn't effect me if they were gone."

In a tongue in cheek ideology homosexuality in men is good because that's more ladies for me. Homosexuality in women is good because that's more porn for me...

See, look on the sunny side of life. :)

Robert
08-04-2009, 02:29 AM
some of yall like robert argued so hard on wucorp to use the word nigger but cry over hearing faggot. faggot.

That's not even true you fucking liar.

I have never "argued so hard on wucorp" to have the word "nigger" used.

I think you might be confused with my arguement that Jasper didn't need to be banned if racist fuckheads like yourself were allowed to compare white people to rabid dogs.

Uncle Steezo
08-04-2009, 02:33 PM
you know you tssa djmeth pat senator and a few others were mad about not being able to say nigger on wucorp abnd know you're mad cause a word that is hurtful to you is being used but you have no ground to stand on.

Robert
08-04-2009, 02:50 PM
you know you tssa djmeth pat senator and a few others were mad about not being able to say nigger on wucorp abnd know you're mad cause a word that is hurtful to you is being used but you have no ground to stand on.


Bahahahahaha!

My favourite part was just after you lied again you said I "have no ground to stand on".

Dr. Simon Hurt
08-04-2009, 03:29 PM
By not being gay you are anti gay. You can't be pro gay and not practice it. If you think its a good idea go practice it. If you don't want to practice it don't protect it. That's hippocritical.

I can't say I support Religion X if I don't practice it. If you don't follow an ideal clearly you think there's something wrong with it. I don't practice Islam because I think its a false religion. Do I hate people who follow it? No, but I'm anti Muslim. I like the people, but I dislike what they stand for.

My status on homosexuality is the same. I'm anti gay but I'm not homophobic. I don't practice it, don't understand it, and don't support it, I don't feel the need to summon rage against them or publically condemn them. I just look at them and think to myself "It doesn't make sense, I want no part in it, but it wouldn't effect me if they were gone."

In a tongue in cheek ideology homosexuality in men is good because that's more ladies for me. Homosexuality in women is good because that's more porn for me...

See, look on the sunny side of life. :)

"If you don't want to practice it don't protect it. That's hippocritical."

how so? i don't like guns but i think people should have the right to carry them if they want. how is that hypocrisy?

i don't like football, but i think other people should have the right to play and watch the game. hypocrisy, how?

this is such a manichean, black and white view of the world.

i'm not muslim, but i don't think muslims should be opressed, discriminated against, or have their freedom to practice or express their faith be compromised. so how would that be anti-muslim?

you can support religions you don't practice if you support people having the right to practice it and freedom to express it. just like you can not be gay, but see nothing inherently wrong with it, and believe that people have the right to practice whatever sexual orientation they want.

Uncle Steezo
08-04-2009, 04:18 PM
if your religion says your god is the only god, then you are anti-other religions.
by supporting another religion, you are shitting on your own.
thats why i'm not religious.

DrBold241
08-05-2009, 08:37 AM
unless you're not a fundamentalist.

DrBold241
08-05-2009, 08:39 AM
LOL "bed wetter" "seaseme street" "esham"

This nigga digs in the crates to find insults for the gawd. Too bad he can't koop up any grolic stew worth sniffin. Your shit is mad unoriginal. You sound like the brady bunch uncut when you insult niggas. I've seen better insults on little bill


http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:Fw8N1iVyuXSH3M:http://blackcartoons.tripod.com/bkbillschool.jpg
Speakonitgawd and bonerfarm meet littlle bill for the first time.

ok when your balls drop and you get your first taste of pussy then MAYBE people will listen.but before you lie about that, learn a little more about the english language.
"yo my nigga, yo nuts ain't even dropped yet. bitch ass, punk ass, eatin out a stankin ass, pussy ass bitch"
there's an insult for you on your level.
wise up.

DrBold241
08-05-2009, 08:45 AM
haha i mean slang it up in person dude, i don't care.
but it's a fucking forum.
READING slang in discussion just sounds so fucking stupid, imo.

YungSunny
08-05-2009, 09:17 AM
ok when your balls drop and you get your first taste of pussy then MAYBE people will listen.but before you lie about that, learn a little more about the english language.
"yo my nigga, yo nuts ain't even dropped yet. bitch ass, punk ass, eatin out a stankin ass, pussy ass bitch"
there's an insult for you on your level.
wise up.

Wise up on what?
You didn't teach me anything, you just told me I'm a prepubescent virgin. Where is the knowledge dropping at? And lol @ my balls not being dropped and I'm 15. When did your balls drop man? I think we need to have a talk because if your balls weren't down by the age of 15 there's a problem here. :yessad:
Let's just talk it out man....talk it out. I'm here.

YungSunny
08-05-2009, 09:19 AM
haha i mean slang it up in person dude, i don't care.
but it's a fucking forum.
READING slang in discussion just sounds so fucking stupid, imo.

Saying fuck in all of your sentences makes you so intelligent. :t

DrBold241
08-05-2009, 11:28 AM
haha better rebutle than i was expecting, i'll give you that.
but dude fact is you're still a kid.
you probably don't have a job, you can't be sent to prison, probably have never had any of the life experience that other posters on here do.
such as being harassed by power-tripping ex-marine douchebag cops at 3 in the morning atleast an hour away from your city while coming down from a lucy trip.

getting back ontop the initial subject of discussion....
homophobia is still biggotry. it may not be towards a race, but it's still prejudice, still hateful, still intolerant.
if you'd fuck a girl in the ass, what's so bad about a man wanting to do it to another man? it's still sodomy, there's just another pair in front.
is it my cup of tea? no. sexual experimentation with a woman i think is fun but i personally find the male body to be unattractive.
however if someone feels differently than me, i won't hate them for it.
do you know why?
CAUSE IT DOESN'T AFFECT ME.
what other people do behind closed doors is none of my concern, shouldn't be yours either.

YungSunny
08-05-2009, 12:33 PM
but dude fact is you're still a kid.
you probably don't have a job, you can't be sent to prison, probably have never had any of the life experience that other posters on here do.
such as being harassed by power-tripping ex-marine douchebag cops at 3 in the morning atleast an hour away from your city while coming down from a lucy trip.


......Duh

Uncle Steezo
08-05-2009, 12:44 PM
but the fact remains Bold,
1. no one is talking about hate. hate is wrong. or is it? is hate without action wrong?

2. its not like people do things "in the privacy of their own homes" nobody does anything in private. so it is my concern. if i make it known that i eat boogers then my booger eating habit is now public domain.

snapple
08-05-2009, 12:49 PM
i don't really care what being gay is about.

i try to understand everything.....

but i will gain absolutely nothing from understanding homos.

i know gay people. guys and girls. and i'm cool with them. i have a cousin whos a dyke and i love her.

i could give a shit if someone is gay or why they're a fag. its not gonna do anything for me.

i say leave them alone, let them do them.

DrBold241
08-05-2009, 03:29 PM
but the fact remains Bold,
1. no one is talking about hate. hate is wrong. or is it? is hate without action wrong?

2. its not like people do things "in the privacy of their own homes" nobody does anything in private. so it is my concern. if i make it known that i eat boogers then my booger eating habit is now public domain.

it's going out of your way to discriminate.
which is prejudice, which is scornful to an extent (if you wanna be technical and not use a word as strong as hate).

Uncle Steezo
08-05-2009, 04:08 PM
gays are protected under the law, so describe gay discrimination as you see it. i don't understand what you are rallying against.