PDA

View Full Version : Why homosexuality should be abolished (!? Check inside.)


Pages : [1] 2

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 11:52 AM
So previously I had made a thread ("Homophobia and Mysogyny in WuCorp (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=80668)") quoted directly from a Huey P Newton transcript. In it, Huey elegantly detailed why we should view the lesbian/gay/bi/trans/queer community as an oppressed one, much like the Afro-Americans and other poor/working peoples, and the two should unite revolutionary potential and struggle alongside one another for change.

I had not made it immediately obvious that this was the work of Huey (only in the post after) as to see what peoples' criticisms would be in the WuTang Corp forum against this one of a handful of African-Americans who had fought for international and human rights of not just black people, but people of all types poor and working class.

If you haven't seen the thread, you can probably predict the responses of some of the social reactionaries on the forum. I recommend you all view this video, ironically titled "Why Homosexuality Should Be Banned"

lSfFa44p96o

It's time we take a second jab at this discussion, and treat them as you would retrospectively with other oppressed groups in the past (eg African Americans of upto but not limited to the end of the Civil Rights movement).

Discuss

TSA
10-13-2009, 11:57 AM
i dont get homophobia.

i dont get why a straight person would ever care. ever
i will never, ever, ever care about snake marriage.
im not a snake, it they marry or don't marry i dont care, they're fucking snakes and im a human being, it will never have anything to do with me, gay marriage is no different.

i think homophobes are closet homosexuals that are trying to be as 'straight as possibly' with their fragile insecure masculinity and heterosexuality.

gays are manlier then homophobes cause they can at least fess up to being a queer.

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-13-2009, 12:08 PM
Do gay people get turned on by their own cawk?

JASPER
10-13-2009, 12:12 PM
I hope not...

*pets cock*

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-13-2009, 12:14 PM
hahaa

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 12:15 PM
Why homosexuality should be abolished (!? Cheks inside.)



http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/meretouched2-1.jpg

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 12:16 PM
Do gay people get turned on by their own cawk?
http://www.addamsfamily.com/addams/lurch4.jpg

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 12:22 PM
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3755/motivatorinevitabilitygix8.jpg

Longbongcilvaringz
10-13-2009, 12:24 PM
Mr. Revolt, as a somewhat seasoned member of this board, i have participated in many such "discussions" relating to this issue in the past.

The opposing 'argument' is without fail is always along 2 or 3 lines, and is predictably one dimensional and idiotic.

There is no point attempting 'discussion' with people with such a mindset.

Stupidity itself isn't the problem, it's obviously part of it, but not the main issue.

More than anything, people hold onto the prejudices which they are taught.

And as you noted previously, the prejudice incoming from minority groups such as Blacks is almost laughable in it's irony, if it weren't so pathetic.

Basically, there's no point trying to talk about this shit.

Let people hold onto that kind of negativity, no doubt they'll be forced to deal with it at some point in the future.

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 12:26 PM
pat, stop acting smart lmao u aint graduate, u failed out.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/DSC00784-2.jpg

11th Chamber
10-13-2009, 12:26 PM
i dont get homophobia.

i dont get why a straight person would ever care. ever


Exactly how iv felt

The way I see it, is if someones gay, than let them do their thing. What, should they be forced to be someone their not the rest of their life?

Huggasaurus Sex
10-13-2009, 12:28 PM
i heard they banned homosexuality in the audio booth

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 12:28 PM
@ 11th chamber
its that kind of thinking^ that makes 2012 a much sweeter event to await.

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-13-2009, 12:29 PM
At the end of the day though, its 2 men, sticking dicks in each other asses.

Its fucking disgusting and does make me wretch a little bit just to think about because it isnt right. Sucking another mans dick? Wtf?

But whatever though its just hard NOT to see it as perverted behavoir, falling in love with another man is just WEIRD

Longbongcilvaringz
10-13-2009, 12:29 PM
pat, stop acting smart lmao u aint graduate, u failed out.

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/DSC00784-2.jpg

haha

I haven't "failed out".

Nonetheless, if i did, i wouldn't be ashamed of it.

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 12:30 PM
i heard they banned homosexuality in the audio booth
dude, they banned the straight niggaz n kept that bottom bunk dwella as mod
















































dwelling on a bottom bunk near u

















http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/meretouched2-1.jpg

Art Vandelay
10-13-2009, 12:57 PM
Its fucking disgusting and does make me wretch a little bit just to think about because it isnt right.

i agree with you 100% that it is disgusting, but that doesn't mean it's wrong or should be banned.

other things i find disgusting...

•shitting on people for pleasure
•eating a girl out while she's on her period
•vaginal child birth
•ranch dressing
•Goldschläger
•seafood
•smelly farts
•the thought of my parents having sex

i find all of these things to be disgusting too, but i don't think they should be banned. ok, maybe my parents having sex, but that's the only one.

Longbongcilvaringz
10-13-2009, 01:07 PM
I'd agree with banning sex between the parents of all corp members.

Backdated.

ALCATRAZ
10-13-2009, 01:07 PM
as someone who lives in one of the most gay friendly cities i can tell you fags have a big problem with niggers ... niggers are taboo in the gay community just like niggers are taboo in any community LOL ... of course this doesn't bother me because i know my place in society but i just don't like it when they try to compare their struggle to the black plight where even though it may be similar, they aren't exactly getting milkshakes poured on their heads and slapped around for livin .... point is, u can hide homosexuality, niggerism, lil harder 2 conceal

Longbongcilvaringz
10-13-2009, 01:09 PM
It's the same shit.

Prejudice for no reason.

MAYOR QUIMBY
10-13-2009, 01:18 PM
If there is no limit to sexuality then it can create chaos. There has to be a limit to everything.

Sure! Let everyone do what they want! Fuck a chicken, swallow another man's cum, wear a fake beard and a blue hat on your head and walk around naked, have sex with a 5 year old,,,..Na man, theres gotta be limits.

"But EmperorLES, having sex with a 5 year old is not consentual, but adult homosexuality is!" Ya, and incest is also consentual, still doesnt make it natural or human. Homosexuality is a psychological problem just the same as pedophilia or arachnophobia.

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 01:23 PM
If there is no limit to sexuality then it can create chaos. There has to be a limit to everything.

Sure! Let everyone do what they want! Fuck a chicken, swallow another man's cum, wear a fake beard and a blue hat on your head and walk around naked, have sex with a 5 year old,,,..Na man, theres gotta be limits.

"But EmperorLES, having sex with a 5 year old is not consentual, but adult homosexuality is!" Ya, and incest is also consentual, still doesnt make it natural or human. Homosexuality is a psychological problem just the same as pedophilia or arachnophobia.
every thing u mentioned there has been dumbed down to the rules n regulations of man, man made laws to keep the order, we are all spawned from incest.

PALEFORCE
10-13-2009, 01:29 PM
as long as no one is bumping dicks in front of me while im trying to eat cereal i could care less. but id be a hypocrite cyz i definitly watch girls scissor each other

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-13-2009, 01:29 PM
i agree with you 100% that it is disgusting, but that doesn't mean it's wrong or should be banned.

other things i find disgusting...

•shitting on people for pleasure
•eating a girl out while she's on her period
•vaginal child birth
•ranch dressing
•Goldschläger
•seafood
•smelly farts
•the thought of my parents having sex

i find all of these things to be disgusting too, but i don't think they should be banned. ok, maybe my parents having sex, but that's the only one.

I didnt say it should be banned because i dont think it should be banned

Im just saying its disgusting, and I honestly dont think its bad for me to say that, because it is.

BUT WHAT PISSES ME OFF THE MOST

Is when the faggots try to compare their being GAY with someone being BLACK

When they try to compare their "plight" to african americans. As if it has any connection or comparison at all. gay people are fucking idiots on the whole who do that.

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 01:31 PM
what makes even less sense to me is why supposedly straight people get all butthurt and defensive for gays and then wonder why "homophobes" act the same way to the other extreme.

if you're a neutral party then quit acting like it's a matter of life and death.

sure I think it's fucked up that some people want to deny gay people rights based on a religion that supposedly facilitates love and understanding, but I'm not gay, so I'm not going to stand out in front of a building holding a poster board either.

everybody has shit that they'd like to do that they can't, so it's not like gays are some exclusive oppressed group that gets all this unfair treatment. in America, at the very most they've got a hard time getting married and they get made fun of.

big fucking deal? I've made fun of literally everyone I know at some point or another, people are way too god damned sensitive.
and as far as marriage goes, why do they want to align themselves with an archaic meaningless tradition like marriage to begin with? being married means shit these days anyway, maybe it's time to move on?

it would make more sense to me, if anything, that gays would be against marriage, since it's traditionally a holy union between man and woman that up until recently, intentionally excluded them. especially since a legal partnership gives them essentially the same rights without having to make payments on a wedding ring.

fuck if I care though. let them marry, have sex, rub whipped cream on each other's cock and eat it off with a crazy-straw, I couldn't care less. I have nothing against gay people having rights, it just seems like a bunch of stupid shit to be offended by to me.

'waaaaaaaa, people make fun of us and they won't let us get married, waaaaaaaaaaaa"

WHO FUCKING CARES???

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 01:33 PM
fuck the fags n the queers, they should be sent back to australia where they came from

MAYOR QUIMBY
10-13-2009, 01:37 PM
it would make more sense to me, if anything, that gays would be against marriage, since it's traditionally a holy union between man and woman that up until recently, intentionally excluded them.
Many want to take advantage of the legal benefits that marriage brings.

PuNcH_iN_PuNcH_OuT
10-13-2009, 01:51 PM
At the end of the day though, its 2 men, sticking dicks in each other asses.

Its fucking disgusting and does make me wretch a little bit just to think about because it isnt right. Sucking another mans dick? Wtf?

But whatever though its just hard NOT to see it as perverted behavoir, falling in love with another man is just WEIRD

As long as people like this are not violent or abusive because of their homophobia then its fine

Same thing as keeping racists out of power

Steve Urkel
10-13-2009, 01:58 PM
After this, those zoophiles who fuck goats will want rights, then come the polygamists ...

JASPER
10-13-2009, 02:00 PM
I think all homos should be executed like they do in Iraq. I mean, God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and STEVE!! DUH!













DUH!

http://www.picrandom.com/images/000r1zd3j.jpg

ALCATRAZ
10-13-2009, 02:04 PM
It's the same shit.

Prejudice for no reason.

nah prejudice against blacks is for no reason, because in the bible there says nothing about pouring a milkshake on a brothas head ... but in the bible it does speak on homosexuality, so the bible thumpers feel they have leverage because of this ... that's my point ... to compare gay struggle to black struggle is harder beacuse homophobes have a book to back them up ... thats all im sayin, shit is still fucked either way

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 02:08 PM
nah prejudice against blacks is for no reason, because in the bible there says nothing about pouring a milkshake on a brothas head ... but in the bible it does speak on homosexuality, so the bible thumpers feel they have leverage because of this ... that's my point ... to compare gay struggle to black struggle is harder beacuse homophobes have a book to back them up ... thats all im sayin, shit is still fucked either way
And racists don't have a book? There are plenty of books that exist which cover the bigoted topics of eugenics, social darwinism and other forms of racialism, and there exist plenty of their followers to this day. Some hide it behind a veil of legal economic action.

It's upto us to combat, challenge and openly confront all forms of racism, homophobia et al as their struggles for liberty are interwoven.

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 02:17 PM
I think all homos should be executed like they do in Iraq. I mean, God created Adam and Even, not Adam and STEVE!! DUH!













DUH!

http://www.picrandom.com/images/000r1zd3j.jpg
deja vu

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 02:19 PM
[Revolt;1711609']And racists don't have a book? There are plenty of books that exist which cover the bigoted topics of eugenics, social darwinism and other forms of racialism, and there exist plenty of their followers to this day. Some hide it behind a veil of legal economic action.

It's upto us to combat, challenge and openly confront all forms of racism, homophobia et al as their struggles for liberty are interwoven.
also, skampoe exists

TSA
10-13-2009, 02:21 PM
At the end of the day though, its 2 men, sticking dicks in each other asses.

Its fucking disgusting and does make me wretch a little bit just to think about because it isnt right. Sucking another mans dick? Wtf?

But whatever though its just hard NOT to see it as perverted behavoir, falling in love with another man is just WEIRD
you know what else is gross. vomit.
and poop

vomit and poop are gross. but i dont care. i dont have an opinion on vomit and poop other then they're gross. Im not equating gays to vomit and poop but gays vomit and poop are 3 things ppl find gross and 3 things i have no powerful opinion on


if i went around an internet board blasting the fact that i hated poop and vomit you can only assume that something significant concerning poop and vomit happened in my life such as the following...

1. im constipated
2. i got pooped on
3. im sick and vomit a lot
4. i got vomitted on.


even then my opinions about poop and vomit won't matter. I dont even care about ppl that eat poop and drink vomit if you wanna use the unnatural or wierd argument

but one thing is for sure, anyone that goes around an internet board blasting their hate for gays is either

1. gay
2. was hurt sexually emotionally or physically by gays or a gay.

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 02:28 PM
you know what else is gross. vomit.
and poop

vomit and poop are gross. but i dont care. i dont have an opinion on vomit and poop other then they're gross. Im not equating gays to vomit and poop but gays vomit and poop are 3 things ppl find gross and 3 things i have no powerful opinion on


if i went around an internet board blasting the fact that i hated poop and vomit you can only assume that something significant concerning poop and vomit happened in my life such as the following...

1. im constipated
2. i got pooped on
3. im sick and vomit a lot
4. i got vomitted on.


even then my opinions about poop and vomit won't matter. I dont even care about ppl that eat poop and drink vomit if you wanna use the unnatural or wierd argument

but one thing is for sure, anyone that goes around an internet board blasting their hate for gays is either

1. gay
2. was hurt sexually emotionally or physically by gays or a gay.
= ^gay!

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 02:34 PM
Many want to take advantage of the legal benefits that marriage brings.

then why not push civil unions, instead? it just seems to contradict the whole cause, crying over marriage, which is one of the biggest traditions of the very institution they're fighting to do away with, which is the ideology of man and woman being the only accepted sexuality.

it's almost as contradictory as people asking "why do you bash gays? what they do doesn't effect you" and then proceeding to bash gay bashers for bashing gays which doesn't effect them.

food for thought
10-13-2009, 02:35 PM
socialist revolt,


good job on your last thread about Huey. the way u set it up was dope.


i recently borrowed a book from the school library that had a bunch of Huey's speeches and writings.

i was reading the chapter on homosexualtiy and noticed i had heard/read the same thing before- it was your first post in that thread.


props.

TSA
10-13-2009, 02:37 PM
i agree with you 100% that it is disgusting, but that doesn't mean it's wrong or should be banned.

other things i find disgusting...

•shitting on people for pleasure
•eating a girl out while she's on her period
•vaginal child birth
•ranch dressing
•Goldschläger
•seafood
•smelly farts
•the thought of my parents having sex

i find all of these things to be disgusting too, but i don't think they should be banned. ok, maybe my parents having sex, but that's the only one.
rnach is fucking gross, have you seen the faggots that put it on pizza? ban those faggots.

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 02:38 PM
socialist revolt,


good job on your last thread about Huey. the way u set it up was dope.


i recently borrowed a book from the school library that had a bunch of Huey's speeches and writings.

i was reading the chapter on homosexualtiy and noticed i had heard/read the same thing before- it was your first post in that thread.


props.
Thanks, that means a lot.

Red salutes, comrade.

TSA
10-13-2009, 02:40 PM
then why not push civil unions, instead? it just seems to contradict the whole cause, crying over marriage, which is one of the biggest traditions of the very institution they're fighting to do away with, which is the ideology of man and woman being the only accepted sexuality.

it's almost as contradictory as people asking "why do you bash gays? what they do doesn't effect you" and then proceeding to bash gay bashers for bashing gays which doesn't effect them.
what?
who said gays were trying to get rid of marriage? and ppl marry animals in india so whose to define what marriage is?


http://i35.tinypic.com/2ns7vc7.pnghttp://i35.tinypic.com/2ns7vc7.pnghttp://i35.tinypic.com/2ns7vc7.png

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-13-2009, 03:01 PM
turds and vomits dont go around trying to adpot kids and getting married and blaming black people for everything

Art Vandelay
10-13-2009, 03:50 PM
turds and vomits dont go around trying to adpot kids and getting married and blaming black people for everything


white people go around trying to adpot kids and getting married and blaming black people for everything. let's ban them

ALCATRAZ
10-13-2009, 03:53 PM
[Revolt]And racists don't have a book? There are plenty of books that exist which cover the bigoted topics of eugenics, social darwinism and other forms of racialism, and there exist plenty of their followers to this day. Some hide it behind a veil of legal economic action.

ur missin tha point, what im sayin is that chrstians have a book that is the END ALL to any discussion ... when people try to say blacks are this and that there is no book as powerful as the bible to back up their cause ... yet on anti gay marriage ads n shit they reference bible quotes n everything, a book that is more or less the inspired word of god ... thats the point ...

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 03:55 PM
ur missin tha point, what im sayin is that chrstians have a book that is the END ALL to any discussion ... when people try to say blacks are this and that there is no book as powerful as the bible to back up their cause ... yet on anti gay marriage ads n shit they reference bible quotes n everything, a book that is more or less the inspired word of god ... thats the point ...
Yeah, and they claimed social darwinism and eugenics were designs by god as well; "He" made the Europeans genetically superior and it justified their rape of the rest of the continents.

It's happening to this day, as they've relentlessly dropped agent orange on the Vietnamese, or white phosphorous gas on the Palestinians, cluster bombs that attract children to its detonation on the Iraqis.

This rape of nations under the justification of God/religion is happening today to deceive the masses! America: "In god we trust," "God bless the USA," and similarly for Israel to justify their brutality.

This mentality exists today; it affects us all. We need to study this phenomena, challenge it internally and among others as well.

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 04:01 PM
what?
who said gays were trying to get rid of marriage? and ppl marry animals in india so whose to define what marriage is?


nah, that's not what I said.

I'm saying they're trying to do away with the whole stranglehold that people have on sexuality based on a preexisting code of ethics, of which marriage is one of the biggest and longest lasting traditions. Why not oppose marriage rather than try and change it?

I agree that nobody has the right to define what marriage is. Nobody knows of the first undeniable source of the act, so who's making the rules?

but it's stupid to me that people are so up in arms over this sort of thing to the point that even straight people get caught up in the argument that gays should have the right to marry. is it really that serious of an issue? why not just drop the ritualistic formalities all together and push for civil unions instead?

shit, if it makes you feel better, kiss each other under a gazebo and call yourselves Mr. and Mr. Smith, what difference does it make?

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 04:04 PM
nah, that's not what I said.
but it's stupid to me that people are so up in arms over this sort of thing to the point that even straight people get caught up in the argument that gays should have the right to marry. is it really that serious of an issue? why not just drop the ritualistic formalities all together and push for civil unions instead?

shit, if it makes you feel better, kiss each other under a gazebo and call yourselves Mr. and Mr. Smith, what difference does it make?
White male protestant 1920s:

but it's stupid to me that people are so up in arms over this sort of thing to the point that even white people get caught up in the argument that blacks should be allowed in white institutions. is it really that serious of an issue? why not just drop the ritualistic formalities all together and push to build more black institutions instead?

shit, if it makes you feel better, build yourself a gazebo and call it Porchmonkey Gazebo, what difference does it make?

----------

I hope that puts it in perspective.

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 04:05 PM
[Revolt;1711714']Yeah, and they claimed social darwinism and eugenics were designs by god as well; "He" made the Europeans genetically superior and it justified their rape of the rest of the continents.

It's happening to this day, as they've relentlessly dropped agent orange on the Vietnamese, or white phosphorous gas on the Palestinians, cluster bombs that attract children to its detonation on the Iraqis.

This rape of nations under the justification of God/religion is happening today to deceive the masses! America: "In god we trust," "God bless the USA," and similarly for Israel to justify their brutality.

This mentality exists today; it affects us all. We need to study this phenomena, challenge it internally and among others as well.

dude, nobody is saying it's right.

the point is that there isn't a book that people draw their conclusions from on such a broad scale that clearly condones racism as clearly as the bible condemns gays.

they're both oppressed groups, that's where the similarities end.

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 04:08 PM
[Revolt;1711724']White male protestant 1920s:

but it's stupid to me that people are so up in arms over this sort of thing to the point that even white people get caught up in the argument that blacks should be allowed in white institutions. is it really that serious of an issue? why not just drop the ritualistic formalities all together and push to build more black institutions instead?

shit, if it makes you feel better, build yourself a gazebo and call it Porchmonkey Gazebo, what difference does it make?

----------

I hope that puts it in perspective.

lol, sorry, but I'm not letting you use my words to make such a miserably dumb and broad analogy.

explain to me how a gay man's plight in 2009 is so much as a fraction of the black man's plight in 1920.

go.

Teh KillaBee
10-13-2009, 04:15 PM
lol @ faggots using logic

selfpwn imo

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 04:17 PM
lol, sorry, but I'm not letting you use my words to make such a miserably dumb and broad analogy.

explain to me how a gay man's plight in 2009 is so much as a fraction of the black man's plight in 1920.

go.

Because shit like this still seems justified against the gay community (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-alvear/stonewall-2009-police-rai_b_286649.html) for no reason other than their sexual orientation (click article link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-alvear/stonewall-2009-police-rai_b_286649.html)):

Plain clothed and uniformed pigs raid a gay bar in Atlanta.

Apparently harassing fags "is a lot more fun than raiding niggers with crack."

Eight staff members were arrested and put in jail without bond. The charge? Dancing in their underwear without a permit.

Among other things, they demanded those who are in the military to identify themselves so that they could be reported to commanding officers.

They searched each and every individual in the bar and couldn't charge any of them with the findings - not even a tiny bit of weed or a fake id was found.

---

Starting to see the similarity?

Teh KillaBee
10-13-2009, 04:22 PM
nope

5hundred&one
10-13-2009, 04:29 PM
^ police harass young people because they're young, does that put young people in anywhere close to the same situation as blacks in the 1920s?

if you look at an earlier post of mine on this page it says 'they're both oppressed groups' (speaking of blacks and gays) so of course I acknowledge the fact that there are despicable actions against gays and there are many prejudiced people who treat them unfairly.

but because there are a few incidents a year and because they can't get married in most states, that makes them comparable with black in the 1920s?

To me, that's a totally different scenario in a much less forgiving society and naturally it's a different principle. People are quick to compare them for one major reason; leverage in a debate. It's easy to make a person who's anti-gay, even if there's no need for such a narrow mindset, look like the tyrant of the world when you compare them to racists, nazis and fascists. Regardless of how stupid these people (gay bashers) are, isn't it a little extreme to compare them to the KKK?

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 04:32 PM
^ police harass young people because they're young, does that put young people in anywhere close to the same situation as blacks in the 1920s?

if you look at an earlier post of mine on this page it says 'they're both oppressed groups' (speaking of blacks and gays) so of course I acknowledge the fact that there are despicable actions against gays and there are many prejudiced people who treat them unfairly.

but because there are a few incidents a year and because they can't get married in most states, that makes them comparable with black in the 1920s?

To me, that's a totally different scenario in a much less forgiving society and naturally it's a different principle. People are quick to compare them for one major reason; leverage in a debate. It's easy to make a person who's anti-gay, even if there's no need for such a narrow mindset, look like the tyrant of the world when you compare them to racists, nazis and fascists. Regardless of how stupid these people (gay bashers) are, isn't it a little extreme to compare them to the KKK?
Think about this logically:

The same reasons that they had not allowed marriages between the so-called Negro and whites was for the same reasons they don't allow gay marriage today: the ridiculous notion that it would soil the sanctity of marriage.

Ain't that a bitch?

TheBoarzHeadBoy
10-13-2009, 05:01 PM
As a closet dick rider... ( I can joke at least ;) )

Honestly I'm not opposed or even disgusted by homosexuality. I don't like the flamboyant gays, I accept them, and I'd never say anything to them about it, but I do dislike them in my mind. Its just a bit too much to take seriously, like an extremely moody woman...

I think Gay marriage is silly. They'll never get a main stream christian marriage, and they shouldn't try to. I don't count a JP as a "true" marriage though it legally is of course. My parents had a JP, so I can't really call it fake or I'd be a bastard... but they should be able to get those. They should be able to get a non religious legal marriage. A legal marriage is for getting married, a Christian marriage is vir et femina.

Wu-Tang Forum Internet Poster
10-13-2009, 05:07 PM
what makes even less sense to me is why supposedly straight people get all butthurt and defensive for gays and then wonder why "homophobes" act the same way to the other extreme.

if you're a neutral party then quit acting like it's a matter of life and death.

sure I think it's fucked up that some people want to deny gay people rights based on a religion that supposedly facilitates love and understanding, but I'm not gay, so I'm not going to stand out in front of a building holding a poster board either.

everybody has shit that they'd like to do that they can't, so it's not like gays are some exclusive oppressed group that gets all this unfair treatment. in America, at the very most they've got a hard time getting married and they get made fun of.

big fucking deal? I've made fun of literally everyone I know at some point or another, people are way too god damned sensitive.
and as far as marriage goes, why do they want to align themselves with an archaic meaningless tradition like marriage to begin with? being married means shit these days anyway, maybe it's time to move on?

it would make more sense to me, if anything, that gays would be against marriage, since it's traditionally a holy union between man and woman that up until recently, intentionally excluded them. especially since a legal partnership gives them essentially the same rights without having to make payments on a wedding ring.

fuck if I care though. let them marry, have sex, rub whipped cream on each other's cock and eat it off with a crazy-straw, I couldn't care less. I have nothing against gay people having rights, it just seems like a bunch of stupid shit to be offended by to me.

'waaaaaaaa, people make fun of us and they won't let us get married, waaaaaaaaaaaa"

WHO FUCKING CARES???

agree

Wu-Tang Forum Internet Poster
10-13-2009, 05:16 PM
[Revolt;1711758']Think about this logically:

The same reasons that they had not allowed marriages between the so-called Negro and whites was for the same reasons they don't allow gay marriage today: the ridiculous notion that it would soil the sanctity of marriage.

Ain't that a bitch?

That comparison is horrible. You can't tell a gay by looking at him. Also, "black" remains a social construct with no scientific basis.

You cannot visually identify a gay, but homosexuality can obviously be defined.

ANd how is 2 gays marrying like a black marrying a white????

Regardless, homosexuality, be it innate or learned behavior(yet to be proven either way) is still a deviation of the laws of nature, coupling and procreation.

That being said, I don't care if people want to be gay. I think its gross, but some people might think its gross when I come on my girl's face.

What people do in the bedroom is their business.

But race is an artificial concept, and sexuality is something real and tangible.

As far as marriage, it, by definition, is the union of a man and woman, which is encouraged in modern society because it encourages coupling and what we deem to be the ideal basis for procreation and nurturing future societies.

I, personally, couldnt give a fuck if gays get married or not. If I had the option of voting, I wouldn't do it. If I HAD to make a decision, I would let them.

But I don't know that they DESERVE to get married.

However, I do think that violence against gays is fucked up.

Teh KillaBee
10-13-2009, 05:23 PM
true story.

I know this older dude that used to be a PA at a hospital. He's working w/ a doc when all the sudden doc starts all kinds of lolling. Guy didn't know why till they get in the room to see the patient. The patient's got a monster of a flashlight stuck in his ass. Doc takes one look at him and asks 'you want me to take it out or change the batteries'.

DrunkenMasta303
10-13-2009, 05:34 PM
every1 thats typing PARAGRAPHS to discuss homosexuality is gay

HANZO
10-13-2009, 05:58 PM
i find it very disturbing that the fag issue makes more headlines and is discussed more than the actual relevant issues in this world.

It shouldnt be hard to accept that in some ppls religions and cultures, or even in their basic principles the concept of homosexuality is seen as something wrong. so naturally they are gonna disagree with gays trying to obtain the right to marry and adopt.

JASPER
10-13-2009, 06:00 PM
Anyone who defended queers in this topic is secretly a homosexual.

Fags aint natural.

Art Vandelay
10-13-2009, 06:08 PM
It shouldnt be hard to accept that in some ppls religions and cultures, or even in their basic principles the concept of homosexuality is seen as something wrong.


some religions see killing people belonging to other religions as right. maybe we should just accept that too.

check two
10-13-2009, 06:11 PM
Socialist must be a virgin?

Sheep Shifter
10-13-2009, 06:22 PM
Socialist must be a virgin?
If by virgin you mean tapped more asian pussy than you, then yeah I am.

I'm comfortable with my sexuality, no need for you to stick your nose in to investigate.

check two
10-13-2009, 06:26 PM
You're a weirdo and creepy.

PuNcH_iN_PuNcH_OuT
10-13-2009, 06:31 PM
white people go around trying to adpot kids and getting married and blaming black people for everything. let's ban them

lets just ban the white ones that say nigga - is there anything more pathetic that a white kid trying to be down acting like gangsters?

Jutzu-Lo-Killer
10-13-2009, 06:36 PM
hoMOsexuals are normal persons
yall arent normal persons BUNCH OFSHITTTT

THE MASON
10-13-2009, 07:13 PM
in the past couple weeks there have been like 5 "hate crimes" on gay dudes, i put hate crimes in quotations, cause if they want to be equal then they have an equal chance of getting stomped out.

its only fair.

Jutzu-Lo-Killer
10-13-2009, 07:29 PM
Open ya mind
respect all people
cuz if u dont respect u will be touched moafaka

gays aint natural?

Why
catholics of shit moafakas
get ya own personality
u are the first one enjoy watching lesbos and after u say thats antinatural

hypocresy is around all the wordl and speaccially ova wucorp

SKAMPOE
10-13-2009, 07:31 PM
http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=85021

Olive Oil Goombah
10-13-2009, 08:03 PM
funny how quick people are to start bashing a group that isn't liked.

Its like because the consensus says they dont like them, it makes it ok.

And these are the same people spouted off about the evils of the West and capitalism etc.


Its so ironic its almost beautiful.

Its like your average moron liberal or conservative.

The liberal voting democrat, basically voting for more and more and more government, yet always afraid of 'Big Brother' and government take over.

The conservative, voting for less government, who staunchly support their presidential choice like he is an emporer or something.


oooh the fucking irony.

Huggasaurus Sex
10-13-2009, 09:01 PM
they aren't exactly getting milkshakes poured on their heads and slapped around for livinyes they are but the difference is they like it.



nah prejudice against blacks is for no reason, because in the bible there says nothing about pouring a milkshake on a brothas headi could've sworn there was a passage in there about not letting one's seed fall on dirt or something to that effect.




[Revolt;1711714']Yeah, and they claimed social darwinism and eugenics were designs by god as wellbut i know for a fact "thou shalt direct the evolution of thy own species through the manipulation of thy genetic code" wasn't in there.




[Revolt;1711714']It's happening to this day, as they've relentlessly dropped agent orange on the Vietnamese...they're fine. it was no biggie. the important thing is they have their KFC and designer handbags.

SKAMPOE
10-14-2009, 07:04 AM
funny how quick people are to start bashing a group that isn't liked.

Its like because the consensus says they dont like them, it makes it ok.

And these are the same people spouted off about the evils of the West and capitalism etc.


Its so ironic its almost beautiful.

Its like your average moron liberal or conservative.

The liberal voting democrat, basically voting for more and more and more government, yet always afraid of 'Big Brother' and government take over.

The conservative, voting for less government, who staunchly support their presidential choice like he is an emporer or something.


oooh the fucking irony.
werd:learning:

Sheep Shifter
10-25-2009, 10:49 PM
Fuck the pilgrims.

Longbongcilvaringz
10-26-2009, 02:14 AM
what makes even less sense to me is why supposedly straight people get all butthurt and defensive for gays and then wonder why "homophobes" act the same way to the other extreme.

if you're a neutral party then quit acting like it's a matter of life and death.

sure I think it's fucked up that some people want to deny gay people rights based on a religion that supposedly facilitates love and understanding, but I'm not gay, so I'm not going to stand out in front of a building holding a poster board either.

everybody has shit that they'd like to do that they can't, so it's not like gays are some exclusive oppressed group that gets all this unfair treatment. in America, at the very most they've got a hard time getting married and they get made fun of.

big fucking deal? I've made fun of literally everyone I know at some point or another, people are way too god damned sensitive.
and as far as marriage goes, why do they want to align themselves with an archaic meaningless tradition like marriage to begin with? being married means shit these days anyway, maybe it's time to move on?

it would make more sense to me, if anything, that gays would be against marriage, since it's traditionally a holy union between man and woman that up until recently, intentionally excluded them. especially since a legal partnership gives them essentially the same rights without having to make payments on a wedding ring.

fuck if I care though. let them marry, have sex, rub whipped cream on each other's cock and eat it off with a crazy-straw, I couldn't care less. I have nothing against gay people having rights, it just seems like a bunch of stupid shit to be offended by to me.

'waaaaaaaa, people make fun of us and they won't let us get married, waaaaaaaaaaaa"

WHO FUCKING CARES???

Well, that's up to you i guess, but you can't help viewing the issue in terms of your own moralisation of being gay or straight, rather than the greater point which is at its the core.

Some people are actively interested in the preservation of civil liberty and individual freedom.

Regardless of whether is effects them personally.

It's easy for someone in your position to dismiss persecution, as it is easy anyone who is privileged enough not to experience such persecution to do so.

But those who feel the preservation of individual freedom is important, can recognise the injustice being inflicting upon minorities, whether it be racial or minorities of sexual orientation.

People can try and separate the two all they like, but they are essentially very similar.

Uncle Steezo
10-26-2009, 02:20 AM
sean micheal milk has spoken....



fggt

Longbongcilvaringz
10-26-2009, 02:22 AM
We know you're not an animal gavin.

You are not an animal.

Sheep Shifter
10-26-2009, 09:45 AM
Well, that's up to you i guess, but you can't help viewing the issue in terms of your own moralisation of being gay or straight, rather than the greater point which is at its the core.

Some people are actively interested in the preservation of civil liberty and individual freedom.

Regardless of whether is effects them personally.

It's easy for someone in your position to dismiss persecution, as it is easy anyone who is privileged enough not to experience such persecution to do so.

But those who feel the preservation of individual freedom is important, can recognise the injustice being inflicting upon minorities, whether it be racial or minorities of sexual orientation.

People can try and separate the two all they like, but they are essentially very similar.
Co-sign.

An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. As ethnic peoples here, we should lend unconditional support to the LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans, Queer) movement in their aims of social emancipation. To vulgarize this would be a threat to our own civil liberties as minorities. It's time we wake up and understand this.

Uncle Steezo
10-26-2009, 11:01 AM
We know you're not an animal gavin.

You are not an animal.


"damn skippy Rosie O. jr"
http://www.filmdope.com/Gallery/ActorsH/8434-5623.gif

harm77
10-27-2009, 07:58 AM
If they abolished homosexuality then half of you niggas in here would be dead. Food for thought would be the first to die.

SID
10-27-2009, 08:27 AM
homos creep me out.

Dikes are bad as well, my old drugdealer was a fullblown dike, it seemed she actually thought she had balls, when girls used to clock her she started acting like a man i swear, it was maaad.

A lot of the influential artists and innovators of the world were homo, i cant tarnish their achievements based on their sexuality, just the idea of two grown men kissing is wierd.

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-28-2009, 06:22 AM
[Revolt;1722215']Co-sign.

An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. As ethnic peoples here, we should lend unconditional support to the LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans, Queer) movement in their aims of social emancipation. To vulgarize this would be a threat to our own civil liberties as minorities. It's time we wake up and understand this.

Dude thats cool and all, but...

1. Does "unconditional support" include spending tax dollars to give a man tits when a flat woman thinks her "outer" flat chested self was really meant to be a DD. Where is the (cosmetic / necessary for emotional happiness) line drawn? is it not sexist to think a man wanting boobs is any different than a woman wanting boobs?

2. Does "unconditional support" include a child's right, or a parents right (for that matter) to allow/force a child to have a sex change. Should a lone child be able to walk into a clinic and start a prescription that suppresses their hormones? Child sex changes are becoming a more common occurrence and the rights of a child to determine their sex choice might scare a lot of parents who honestly think their kid is simply going through a phase.

In Conclusion: "Unconditional Support" sounds real cute, but maybe domestic partnerships(that's equivalent to a legal marriage) is good enough for 2009.... So can the ghay revolutionist put down their torches after that? Call a truce for a couple hundred years.

SKAMPOE
10-28-2009, 06:27 AM
hahahahaha

SKAMPOE
10-28-2009, 06:52 AM
the more homos there are, the more poon i smash...its a vicious cycle

JASPER
10-28-2009, 06:56 AM
the more homos there are, the more poon i smash...its a vicious cycle
I thought you were married. Either way, co sign.

SKAMPOE
10-28-2009, 06:58 AM
Wat momma dont know wont hurt her...

Sheep Shifter
10-28-2009, 07:15 AM
Dude thats cool and all, but...

1. Does "unconditional support" include spending tax dollars to give a man tits when a flat woman thinks her "outer" flat chested self was really meant to be a DD. Where is the (cosmetic / necessary for emotional happiness) line drawn? is it not sexist to think a man wanting boobs is any different than a woman wanting boobs?

2. Does "unconditional support" include a child's right, or a parents right (for that matter) to allow/force a child to have a sex change. Should a lone child be able to walk into a clinic and start a prescription that suppresses their hormones? Child sex changes are becoming a more common occurrence and the rights of a child to determine their sex choice might scare a lot of parents who honestly think their kid is simply going through a phase.

In Conclusion: "Unconditional Support" sounds real cute, but maybe domestic partnerships(that's equivalent to a legal marriage) is good enough for 2009.... So can the ghay revolutionist put down their torches after that? Call a truce for a couple hundred years.

1) How can this be done when Americans don't even have basic healthcare? That itself is a basis of unity between revolutionary minded people and the LGBTQ community.

Also, I'm not trying to insult you, but out of tax dollars and how they are spent, the least of your worries should be operated transgendereds, as the financial elite fucks with your taxes exponentially more than could ever be drained from the LGBTQ community in their operations, lol.

2) "Does "unconditional support" include a child's right, or a parents right (for that matter) to allow/force a child to have a sex change." LOL, WHAT?! Nothing like this has ever happened! It's not as if gay parents raise gay children - homosexuality is a biological deviation, not something that comes nurture and environment. If this were true, it's opposite would be true that straight parents raise only straight kids.

How about the larger crime of parents abandoning or abusing children because of their homosexuality - an abuse influenced by religion and state sanctioned homophobic laws. Is this not a much more relevant happenstance than the ridiculoud notion that gay parents maye force their children to have a sex-change?

Red salutes,
Sickle

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-28-2009, 10:55 PM
[Revolt;1723738']1) How can this be done when Americans don't even have basic healthcare? That itself is a basis of unity between revolutionary minded people and the LGBTQ community.

Sickle,
Changing the subject is not helping your cause. Lets just stay on topic and maybe, just maybe address the questions brought forth. Your jab at American's Heathcare is NOT related to Worldly issues that concern homosexuality(save it for another thread).

[Revolt;1723738']
Also, I'm not trying to insult you, but out of tax dollars and how they are spent, the least of your worries should be operated transgendereds, as the financial elite fucks with your taxes exponentially more than could ever be drained from the LGBTQ community in their operations, lol.

You do insult me when you think "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" and then you hypocritically tell me the "least of my worries should be paying for transgenders surgeries" Seriously? I'm not allowed to give a shit about big and small issues? Its one or the other?!? Stop avoiding my bad ass questions and start answering them to the best of your abilities.

[Revolt;1723738']
2) "Does "unconditional support" include a child's right, or a parents right (for that matter) to allow/force a child to have a sex change." LOL, WHAT?! Nothing like this has ever happened! It's not as if gay parents raise gay children - homosexuality is a biological deviation, not something that comes nurture and environment. If this were true, it's opposite would be true that straight parents raise only straight kids.

Clearly something is lost in communication because I never wrote/believe "gay parents raise gay children - homosexuality is a biological deviation, not something that comes nurture and environment." I wrote.... "Kids have right", "Trannies" have rights. But should a kid be allowed to be a tranny? Becareful with your responce. Google "child sex changes" if you need help forming a defense.

[Revolt;1723738']
How about the larger crime of parents abandoning or abusing children because of their homosexuality - an abuse influenced by religion and state sanctioned homophobic laws. Is this not a much more relevant happenstance than the ridiculoud notion that gay parents maye force their children to have a sex-change?

And back to your hipocritical attitude.... Do you actually belive "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" or do you just write it to look cool?

Huggasaurus Sex
10-29-2009, 12:18 AM
this guy signed up just so he could seriously win arguments on a website's forum. fag.

ALCATRAZ
10-29-2009, 12:57 AM
-You cant be right if your not prepared for a bomb of knowledge to drop on yo ass-

lolol

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-29-2009, 01:30 AM
this guy signed up just so he could seriously win arguments on a website's forum. fag.

does it hurts to learn a thing or two from someone else with similar interests? i mean like emotionally? closet fag.

btw: i like to insult when appropriate. and i can contribute when people *cough*(you know who you are) answer my insightful questions instead of questioning the validity or substance of them. Realize its a good question and give me a little more credit.

RALPH WIGGUM
10-29-2009, 04:10 AM
Secondary.

Longbongcilvaringz
10-29-2009, 06:01 AM
I was just reading UnequivocallyCorrect (http://wutang-corp.com/forum/member.php?u=65086) posts as if they were CoolDan's lol.

I assume that is his secondary, i didn't even notice the difference.

I'm confused.

TheBoarzHeadBoy
10-29-2009, 06:10 AM
Yeah, if it's a secondary its Dan's. You can tell by the tone and voice of the writing.

Anyhow, my theory is we kill all the straight people in a genocide (then I finish it offHitler style by shooting the last Jew in Germany aka kill myself as the last straight person) then the gays attempt to live, but are forced to go straight by the process and learn their lesson.

Honestly, it's the only way to show them what would happen if everyone was gay.

Mumm Ra
10-29-2009, 06:11 AM
I was just reading UnequivocallyCorrect (http://wutang-corp.com/forum/member.php?u=65086) posts as if they were CoolDan's lol.

I assume that is his secondary, i didn't even notice the difference.

I'm confused.^ the exact same thoughts passed through my brain, word for word
even just looking at the name - not the meaning of the words, but the look - it might as well read DivineAsiaticBlackDan somehow

Sheep Shifter
10-29-2009, 08:13 AM
Sickle,
Changing the subject is not helping your cause. Lets just stay on topic and maybe, just maybe address the questions brought forth. Your jab at American's Heathcare is NOT related to Worldly issues that concern homosexuality(save it for another thread).

Actually it is. Conservative politics has convinced you that social issues such as homosexuality are more important than your economic emancipation. So while you're being chiseled at by bureaucratic statists receiving kickbacks, here you are on a forum arguing against giving equal rights to the peoples of the LGBTQ community. Your problem is you fear change, you fear evolution and progress. In a few decades time, your view will be swept into the dustbins of history where it belongs.

You do insult me when you think "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" and then you hypocritically tell me the "least of my worries should be paying for transgenders surgeries" Seriously? I'm not allowed to give a shit about big and small issues? Its one or the other?!? Stop avoiding my bad ass questions and start answering them to the best of your abilities.

In your head compare the trillions of taxpayer dollars used to bailout fatcat bourgey CEOs to the zero dollars in America that has and probably will ever have gone to subsidize the sex-change operations of transgenders, and you're still arguing against it. Your priorities are wrong; once again, conservative politics has convinced you that social issues are more important than your economic emancipation.


Clearly something is lost in communication because I never wrote/believe "gay parents raise gay children - homosexuality is a biological deviation, not something that comes nurture and environment." I wrote.... "Kids have right", "Trannies" have rights. But should a kid be allowed to be a tranny? Becareful with your responce. Google "child sex changes" if you need help forming a defense.

That's a decision to be made once a person is an adult.

And back to your hipocritical attitude.... Do you actually belive "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" or do you just write it to look cool?

You rock an American flag as your avatar; the same flag that kidnapped (hundred) millions of African slaves, exterminated the American native, overthrew countless democratic governments, and refuses to give equal rights to people born homosexual. Yet, I'm the hypocrite.

Right.

oDoUoSoKo
10-29-2009, 09:40 AM
i think homophobes are closet homosexuals that are trying to be as 'straight as possibly' with their fragile insecure masculinity and heterosexuality.
truth...TSA boy tell em..eloels.

5hundred&one
10-29-2009, 10:08 AM
derp derp..homosexuals..durr..x-men..eloels.

^ average dusk post ^

lynskey
10-29-2009, 10:47 AM
You cannot abolish something people have no choice over.

Abolish something? Religion

Wu-Tang Forum Internet Poster
10-29-2009, 02:16 PM
I was just reading UnequivocallyCorrect (http://wutang-corp.com/forum/member.php?u=65086) posts as if they were CoolDan's lol.

I assume that is his secondary, i didn't even notice the difference.

I'm confused.


Yeah, if it's a secondary its Dan's. You can tell by the tone and voice of the writing.

Anyhow, my theory is we kill all the straight people in a genocide (then I finish it offHitler style by shooting the last Jew in Germany aka kill myself as the last straight person) then the gays attempt to live, but are forced to go straight by the process and learn their lesson.

Honestly, it's the only way to show them what would happen if everyone was gay.

^ the exact same thoughts passed through my brain, word for word
even just looking at the name - not the meaning of the words, but the look - it might as well read DivineAsiaticBlackDan somehow



I am shocked and appalled.

How could you faggots think that that faggot is this faggot?

All you saw was his american flag avatar and equated it to my american flag sig.

Why would I start a secondary to contradict myself in a thread in which I had already stated my opinion?

I type in very short paragraphs whereas Unequiviacally spaces less.

He also did this thing to represent an action: :shakes head:

I hate using colons to denote action.

Also, Why would I use a secondary? Ive never been shy about voicing my unpopular opinions.

Moderators--Use your modliness to clear my name.

As for the rest of you, please feel free to apologize for slandering my good name. If it is too embarassing to post it here, PM wil suffice.

And may god have mercy on your godless derelict souls.

Especially you, Sean. I thought you knew me better.

ALCATRAZ
10-29-2009, 02:18 PM
derp derp..homosexuals..durr..x-men..eloels.

^ average dusk post ^

lol

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-29-2009, 08:17 PM
I AM SO FUCKING GLAD YOU ACTUALLY ANSWERED ONE QUESTION I BROKE MY CAPSLOCK :(

Maybe you can answer more than 1 next time. I try not to write anything without thinking it over. If you have criticisms I can and will gladly address them(but im usually right). However if you cry and cry about something totally off topic im going to nail ur ass to the wall so everyone can see your hypocritical posts are Swiss cheese. i dont know u, but your last two posts in this thread are hypocritical. -FACT ....dont make me find the quotes..... lets move on....

STOP TELLING ME WHAT I SHOULD CARE ABOUT:

Your an idiot if you think i should ignore the previously presented questions because other larger issues of bank bail outs needs to be address. Fuck off! I give shit about both issues and I CAN approach both problems, but it might be too hard for someone like yourself. Then again im a man who actually believes "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". So fuck off and let us solve this issue in the thread it started in (go start a bank bail out thread or some shit).

The one question you actually answered in your last post was.....
Q: Should a kid be allowed to be a tranny?
A: That's a decision to be made once a person is an adult.

Second Part to my Question: Take into consideration a child must start their hormone therapy early in life for a more successful gender change. If im giving Trannies unconditional support to be a tranny. And its so natural they should know early on. It seems wrong to restrain them from their "inner gender" until they are an adult. Doesn't it? almost gross to make that guy grow a big-ol shlog just so he can cut it off at 18 instead if 8. Your support for "Unconditional Support" for trannies SEEMS like it should Support trannies of all ages? No?

IM PATRIOTIC NOOB:

Yes I rock an American Flag avatar. I love my country. Want to question America's greatness??? Lets save THAT topic for another thread also. I NEVER said/indicated im pro-kidnapping/extermination. Jesus.... how do you communicate on a daily basis??!?!?!? I Proved your a hypocrite, but YOU have only been able to defend your socialist ideas by making assumptions about my beliefs.

Maybe we can start over and you can give me more credit. That way we dont need to post back and forth about how valid it is to raise such a question (you seem nice and i dont want to push your face into the sand, again)

Sheep Shifter
10-29-2009, 08:21 PM
Wait.. I'm the hypocrite? Look over these two quotes:

Then again im a man who actually believes "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere".

Yes I rock an American Flag avatar. I love my country.

This is why you've already committed political suicide.

You align yourself with a national bourgeois that doesn't give two shits about you; you're a fascist's wet dream. Your views, like yourself, will be swept into the dustbins of history.

I don't have time to make conversation with reactionary halfwits like yourself because it is like debating with a brick wall. I organize with the poor and working class on a daily basis. You organize your dick in your hand.

This niggas American dreamin'.

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-29-2009, 08:29 PM
Some people know how to answer a question, some are too scared. Which are you?

*criticize me on a different thread, im ENTITLED to criticize homosexuality on this one....

fucking cry baby...

Uncle Steezo
10-29-2009, 08:58 PM
the Gaze run this site Bob.
if you are not into sperm cells burrowing into your doo doo logs, the best thing to do is find a secluded corner, pull out your cock and stroke it quietly. cause we all about dick up yo ass and in yo mouth on wucorp. if you aint into that (possibly some heavy petting) then you might as well log off now.

Tecknowledgist
10-29-2009, 09:01 PM
You cannot abolish something people have no choice over.

Abolish something? Religion

woop, there it is. this is the end of the discussion.

this dude said in nine words what you faggots struggled to do for over one hundred posts.

BTTR KNG KOOL
10-29-2009, 09:07 PM
Yea i def agree with thread starter. Ive seen a good person fall off cos he wasnt accepted. A real good dude. Actually i dont know how hes doing nowdays cos he disappeared completely. Last time i heard about him, he wasnt doing good at all cos of all teh bullshit..

Its a goddamn shame.

...Theres people out there who try to figure out whether someones gay cos of mental issues or physical issues. But it doesnt really even matter, cos these people are still left with the same problem even if they figure it out, You know. Its all waste of time & energy.

oDoUoSoKo
10-29-2009, 09:10 PM
^ average dusk post ^
http://tonova.typepad.com/thesuddencurve/images/2007/06/30/wigger.jpg

average 501 pic

ALCATRAZ
10-29-2009, 09:11 PM
i dont know why gay people trip in 2009 ... it aint like u black ... u can hide that gay shit lol

oDoUoSoKo
10-29-2009, 09:14 PM
lol
:cheerlie:

oDoUoSoKo
10-29-2009, 09:15 PM
i dont know why gay people trip in 2009 ... it aint like u black ... u can hide that gay shit lol
:lmao: its almost like ur serious.

UnequivocallyCorrect
10-29-2009, 09:30 PM
Tolerance is my middle name. I have a lot of respect for homosexuals and the shit they unfairly take. But I also LOVE to educate Extremists on topics that are not as simple as "Unconditional support" for LBGT. That's for the Ignorant of this earth.

In Conclusion: "Unconditional Support" sounds real cute, but maybe domestic partnerships(that's equivalent to a legal marriage) is good enough for 2009.... Disagree? please feel free to enlighten me....

ALCATRAZ
10-29-2009, 10:34 PM
:lmao: its almost like ur serious.
u god damn straight i'm serious ... nigga, until you start gettin milkshakes poured on ur head just for livin u aint got shit on the black plight ... faggits stay mad cuz they cant suck dick in the middle of the street n shit ...

Mic Tyson
10-29-2009, 10:39 PM
faggits stay mad cuz they cant suck dick in the middle of the street n shit ...

rofl

food for thought
10-29-2009, 10:45 PM
hahaha

Uncle Steezo
10-29-2009, 11:16 PM
we should just legalize and then tax gay sex acts.

$2.00 for every dick sucked in the street.
$5.00 for every doo doo log thats skeeted on.
$1.00 for every bateman post.
$0.50 for each day Sid wakes up.

Longbongcilvaringz
10-30-2009, 02:05 AM
I am shocked and appalled.

How could you faggots think that that faggot is this faggot?

All you saw was his american flag avatar and equated it to my american flag sig.

Why would I start a secondary to contradict myself in a thread in which I had already stated my opinion?

I type in very short paragraphs whereas Unequiviacally spaces less.

He also did this thing to represent an action: :shakes head:

I hate using colons to denote action.

Also, Why would I use a secondary? Ive never been shy about voicing my unpopular opinions.

Moderators--Use your modliness to clear my name.

As for the rest of you, please feel free to apologize for slandering my good name. If it is too embarassing to post it here, PM wil suffice.

And may god have mercy on your godless derelict souls.

Especially you, Sean. I thought you knew me better.

I'm just calling it how i see it.

If that's not you, then i'd apologise.

Poetic Wun
10-30-2009, 02:30 AM
I am shocked and appalled.

How could you faggots think that that faggot is this faggot?

All you saw was his american flag avatar and equated it to my american flag sig.

Why would I start a secondary to contradict myself in a thread in which I had already stated my opinion?

I type in very short paragraphs whereas Unequiviacally spaces less.

He also did this thing to represent an action: :shakes head:

I hate using colons to denote action.

Also, Why would I use a secondary? Ive never been shy about voicing my unpopular opinions.

Moderators--Use your modliness to clear my name.

As for the rest of you, please feel free to apologize for slandering my good name. If it is too embarassing to post it here, PM wil suffice.

And may god have mercy on your godless derelict souls.

Especially you, Sean. I thought you knew me better.
somebody denyin a secondary WOULD say this
i dont know why gay people trip in 2009 ... it aint like u black ... u can hide that gay shit lol
lol
idk why black people trip in 2009... it aint like it's the 1950's... nobody lookin to hang you

5hundred&one
10-30-2009, 05:30 AM
average 501 pic

http://www.netsummary.dk/bianco/images/ugly_girl.jpg

average dusk girlfriend

oDoUoSoKo
10-31-2009, 05:25 PM
u god damn straight i'm serious ... nigga, until you start gettin milkshakes poured on ur head just for livin u aint got shit on the black plight ... faggits stay mad cuz they cant suck dick in the middle of the street n shit ...
avg. 501 girlfriend:lmao:

zooruka
10-31-2009, 05:38 PM
I have no problem what so ever with people attacking the gay lifestyle whatever form it takes , and dont feel sorry for anyone who comes under attack...that doesn`t mean I hate homosexuals as persons but I do hate there lifestyle...thses people have been duped by satan in that regard I feel sorry for them. these people need to be told and made to know what they are doing is wrong and immoral !!!!

homosexuality is a grave sin full stop !!!!

for all thiose people who say they don`t care you are just burying your head in the sand and ignoring the war that is raging around us between good and evil.


peace be with you !

oDoUoSoKo
10-31-2009, 06:34 PM
fuck u and ur sheep fucking, half witted deity Jesus...lawls

Ghost In The 'Lac
10-31-2009, 06:38 PM
hahah look at Dusk still getting incredibly upset over people telling him being Gay is a sin

Dusk just come out dude, its fucking obvious your a sinful faggot ass licker elohels

harm77
10-31-2009, 06:54 PM
I have no problem what so ever with people attacking the gay lifestyle whatever form it takes , and dont feel sorry for anyone who comes under attack...that doesn`t mean I hate homosexuals as persons but I do hate there lifestyle...thses people have been duped by satan in that regard I feel sorry for them. these people need to be told and made to know what they are doing is wrong and immoral !!!!

homosexuality is a grave sin full stop !!!!

for all thiose people who say they don`t care you are just burying your head in the sand and ignoring the war that is raging around us between good and evil.



peace be with you !

Your a 100% right. Thats the problem people have been brainwashed into thinking that that lifestyle is okay. They doctrinate you young to accept it and make it seem like its the normal thing to be.

5hundred&one
10-31-2009, 07:26 PM
can't we just let this shit thread die already?

oDoUoSoKo
10-31-2009, 07:40 PM
LACEY!!! I TOLD U I WAS GAY ALREADY...member that totally straight picture of JAMIE FOXX'S DICK u posted a lil while back? i totally like it..and lmao at incredibly upset. incredible fail.

oDoUoSoKo
10-31-2009, 07:43 PM
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3289/2716384364_eab5d33baf.jpg?v=0

just as gay as me^^

5hundred&one
11-01-2009, 02:43 AM
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:u0pl_fHi13f5IM:http://www.creepynights.org/Gallery-2005/grave-rip2.JPG

SID
11-01-2009, 07:09 AM
we should just legalize and then tax gay sex acts.

$2.00 for every dick sucked in the street.
$5.00 for every doo doo log thats skeeted on.
$1.00 for every bateman post.
$0.50 for each day Sid wakes up.

I like how my name is the only word that starts with a capital letter in your whole post.

xoxoxo

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 08:25 AM
*RESSURECTION* [Gill Voice from SF3]

Longbongcilvaringz
11-01-2009, 09:34 AM
Interesting how most people here label Zooruka as both a religious nut and someone who holds ludicrous antiquated beliefs, yet, most align with him on the subject of homosexuality.

At least Zooruka has his demented dogmatic religious beliefs to justify his hatred.

The rest of you are idiotic in a far more profound and pronounced manner.

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 10:20 AM
At least Zooruka has his demented dogmatic religious beliefs to justify his hatred.

The rest of you are idiotic in a far more profound and pronounced manner.


lol

Inspectah_Dirk
11-01-2009, 10:35 AM
It comes down to this:

EVERYONE who thinks homosexuality is a sin and/or a disease

SHOULD BE SHOT IN THE HEAD. Right between the eyes, BANG, one shot, dead.

I actually mean this. I cannot believe someone is stupid enough to think that.

Also, people who do think that, and think my reaction is too much and i'm like an idiot for saying that, homosexuals think the same about you when you say your shit, only 100 times worse.

So ya'll pray to your lame gods, that i will never EVER posess a gun.

KLIION JENSEN
11-01-2009, 10:37 AM
forget the religious aspect of it, homosexuality is an abomination against NATURE.....

gay people & gay huggers (like tree huggers) say that homosexuality is natural & they cant help it....bullshit....the nature of sex is to reproduce, yeah its fun aswell, if you have a good partner, but the truest nature of fucking is to reproduce, and nature insists that the only way to reproduce is to mix what a man has with what a woman has, thus making homosexuality unnatural....

KLIION JENSEN
11-01-2009, 10:39 AM
It comes down to this:

EVERYONE who thinks homosexuality is a sin and/or a disease

SHOULD BE SHOT IN THE HEAD. Right between the eyes, BANG, one shot, dead.

I actually mean this. I cannot believe someone is stupid enough to think that.

Also, people who do think that, and think my reaction is too much and i'm like an idiot for saying that, homosexuals think the same about you when you say your shit, only 100 times worse.

So ya'll pray to your lame gods, that i will never EVER posess a gun.

so, who's gay in your family then ???

Inspectah_Dirk
11-01-2009, 10:40 AM
Somehow, after reading this thread, it makes me wanna leave this forum forever because of the stupidity of some people.

No, being a homo is not natural, it's like a malfunction in the brain. Like being a pedophile. But it's no disease, and certainly not a choice. It's not changable.
But whatever, people stupid enough to think that it is, are too hopless to tell them otherwise.

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 11:06 AM
how come all humans cant be smart and reasonable like tupac

Longbongcilvaringz
11-01-2009, 11:14 AM
What can i tell you, let me spell it for you, W~I~L~L~I~E.

Spanish Jose introduced me to cane.

BTW i could rap.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 11:41 AM
lol
why the fuck are YOU laughin, Drunken Monk? lawls.

check two
11-01-2009, 02:55 PM
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/dhonig2/BiblicalFamilyLaw800.jpg

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 03:10 PM
eloels^

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 04:11 PM
I have no problem what so ever with people attacking the gay lifestyle whatever form it takes , and dont feel sorry for anyone who comes under attack...that doesn`t mean I hate homosexuals as persons but I do hate there lifestyle...thses people have been duped by satan in that regard I feel sorry for them. these people need to be told and made to know what they are doing is wrong and immoral !!!!

I have no problem what so ever with people attacking the idiotic lifestyle whatever form it takes , and dont feel sorry for anyone who comes under attack...that doesn`t mean I hate idiots as persons but I do hate there lifestyle...thses people have been duped by religious/political leaders in that regard I feel sorry for them. these people need to be told and made to know what they are doing is wrong and immoral

*mofo took the words outta my mouth


homosexuality is a grave sin full stop !!!!


is that like a Birth Moral Partial Beginning? Flashy, hollow hollow words.

But, Check these words out.
"If you belong to a large scale organized religion who's conforming to their EVER CHANGING doctrine. You too should be prepared for your own "beliefs" to conform to their EVER CHANGING doctrine"
Once homosexuality isn't banned by god. Thats all im say'n...


for all thiose people who say they don`t care you are just burying your head in the sand and ignoring the war that is raging around us between good and evil.

A good warrior deserves respect for following his leader. an intelligent human deserves respect for thinking for himself and being responsible for his actions. And you think we need a couple more warriors? Ya right....

Please, tell me what you consider a "good" reason why its a battle between "good and evil" I want to be on your side, but I just need more convincing...

angry!
11-01-2009, 04:22 PM
i dont like flaming homos, and i dont like closet fags either!!!!

i dont like fags period!!!!!

if you claim to be heterosexual, you lookin real suspect voyaging for homosexual acceptance!!!!

whats even worse is these lesbian couples adopting children!!!! you may aswell raise a child with a dick in his mouth!!!! id rather get raised by an abusive drunk single father, than two clam licking dykes any day of the week!!!!!

being homo isnt hip hop!!!! take that shit to pottery class!!!!

i dont wanna associate with people who fuck animals neither!!!!! but id be quicker to shake the hand of a horse fucking porn star than a dick sucking man!!!!!

PuNcH_iN_PuNcH_OuT
11-01-2009, 04:24 PM
Somehow, after reading this thread, it makes me wanna leave this forum forever because of the stupidity of some people.

No, being a homo is not natural, it's like a malfunction in the brain. Like being a pedophile. But it's no disease, and certainly not a choice. It's not changable.
But whatever, people stupid enough to think that it is, are too hopless to tell them otherwise.
..... and this is clever right?

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 04:30 PM
some bull shit.... idk.

Gay animals been pushn poop since "the beginning", sounds pretty NATURAL to me.

By YOUR definition on "Natural".... If you just don't want kids, your as UNNATURAL as a homosexual. So... do you want children? Homo?

Think then post.

۞StarPriest۞
11-01-2009, 04:31 PM
^being homo isnt hip hop!!!! take that shit to pottery class!!!!






























.........






























So yeah your post was horribly intolerant........















but.......









LMAO

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 04:37 PM
i dont like flaming homos, and i dont like closet fags either!!!!

i dont like fags period!!!!!

if you claim to be heterosexual, you lookin real suspect voyaging for homosexual acceptance!!!!

whats even worse is these lesbian couples adopting children!!!! you may aswell raise a child with a dick in his mouth!!!! id rather get raised by an abusive drunk single father, than two clam licking dykes any day of the week!!!!!

being homo isnt hip hop!!!! take that shit to pottery class!!!!

i dont wanna associate with people who fuck animals neither!!!!! but id be quicker to shake the hand of a horse fucking porn star than a dick sucking man!!!!!

Seriously??!?!?!?!?!?!??! you dont like a little poke in ur measly little butt hole??? not even a little finger?!? Maybe your not angry, maybe your curious?!?! Arnt you a little curious why "once you go ghay you never go back"???

I bet a man could satisfy you better than any women you have been with..... Its cause guys know what guys like. Just think about it.... Think about how much you would enjoy it...

Ghost In The 'Lac
11-01-2009, 04:55 PM
LACEY!!! I TOLD U I WAS GAY ALREADY..\

wow ok

power to you brother

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 04:56 PM
i dont like flaming homos, and i dont like closet fags either!!!!

i dont like fags period!!!!!

if you claim to be heterosexual, you lookin real suspect voyaging for homosexual acceptance!!!!

whats even worse is these lesbian couples adopting children!!!! you may aswell raise a child with a dick in his mouth!!!! id rather get raised by an abusive drunk single father, than two clam licking dykes any day of the week!!!!!

being homo isnt hip hop!!!! take that shit to pottery class!!!!

i dont wanna associate with people who fuck animals neither!!!!! but id be quicker to shake the hand of a horse fucking porn star than a dick sucking man!!!!!
lmao, how old are you? seriously? you cant call urself an adult.

5hundred&one
11-01-2009, 05:05 PM
The Changing Man
Location: Gay, NY
__________________
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7679/sonicrip.jpg

^ wow the evidence is really starting to stack up...

zooruka
11-01-2009, 05:20 PM
Seriously??!?!?!?!?!?!??! you dont like a little poke in ur measly little butt hole??? not even a little finger?!? Maybe your not angry, maybe your curious?!?! Arnt you a little curious why "once you go ghay you never go back"???

I bet a man could satisfy you better than any women you have been with..... Its cause guys know what guys like. Just think about it.... Think about how much you would enjoy it...


I will pray for this guy ^^^^


peace be with you !

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 05:26 PM
The Changing Man
Location: Gay, NY
__________________
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7679/sonicrip.jpg

^ wow the evidence is really starting to stack up...
it's funny cuz he actually means it ... inside his heart n what not

food for thought
11-01-2009, 05:29 PM
yea i can see it, as well.

PALEFORCE
11-01-2009, 05:40 PM
men are naturally attracted to women vice versa thats the way it was meant to be
if your a fag or dyke have fun

its like all these fag fashion designers that got skinny anorexic bitches modeling

that shits not hot

hetero men do not find these coke whores hot

zooruka
11-01-2009, 05:41 PM
^^^^ yo food sorry for saying that stuff about you in your sig !!!!




peace son

peace

angry!
11-01-2009, 05:42 PM
Seriously??!?!?!?!?!?!??! you dont like a little poke in ur measly little butt hole??? not even a little finger?!? Maybe your not angry, maybe your curious?!?! Arnt you a little curious why "once you go ghay you never go back"???

I bet a man could satisfy you better than any women you have been with..... Its cause guys know what guys like. Just think about it.... Think about how much you would enjoy it...

you live in san fransisco b!!!! gay capitol of the world!!!! that says it all!!!! if you werent tolerant to dick sucking and ass fucking you woulda skipped town a long time ago!!!!!

all these "straight" men getting sensitive over my personal opinion can stick their softend, artistic, girl hands, into whatever ass they want!!!!

now go finish cutting your "my son/friend/partner was killed, just because he was gay" promos!!!!

check two
11-01-2009, 05:42 PM
I don't find the big fat ass wic check white girls from the hood good looking either.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 05:45 PM
The Changing Man
Location: Gay, NY
__________________
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/7679/sonicrip.jpg

^ wow the evidence is really starting to stack up...
smh, ud think me actually saying i was gay would be enough....its so hard for me to believe people can be so stupid, but alas...they are. i have to say that im gay in order to defend civil rights. and any little defensive comment, makes me a gay person, despite me liking women. i dont think its me who needs to "come out" here, are you people actual serious? or is this one of those like...GHOSTLACED persona joke/pranks? are you really this stupid? or did u guys decide to humor zooruka and see where it goes..eloels.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 05:48 PM
you live in san fransisco b!!!! gay capitol of the world!!!! that says it all!!!! if you werent tolerant to dick sucking and ass fucking you woulda skipped town a long time ago!!!!!

all these "straight" men getting sensitive over my personal opinion can stick their softend, artistic, girl hands, into whatever ass they want!!!!

now go finish cutting your "my son/friend/partner was killed, just because he was gay" promos!!!!
how often are you bullied at your junior highschool? do the big jocks who fuck hot cheerleaders beat the shit out of u on the daily? do they make u eat their shit? do they fuck your mother? why is it so important for u to feel like fuckin randy savage? ya your angry, because ur confused..and your frustrated by your lack of knowledge...and pussy.

Ghost In The 'Lac
11-01-2009, 05:58 PM
Dusk is making a cry for help, be there for him guys.

zooruka
11-01-2009, 06:06 PM
Dusk is making a cry for help, be there for him guys.


yeah I dont understand that dusk guy and UnequivocallyCorrect trying to passionatly defend gays on some politically correct shit...hahahaha thats all bulshit...they are being duped by satan,he has blinded them to the truth and they don`t even know it...there is no political correctness in this issue , there is only right and wrong..here peep the truth.


Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

peace be with you

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 06:06 PM
eloels, im waitin for one of those e-interventions, or e-terventions...or internetventions....ya..

but seriously, laced and co. if i was gay...after all of this hullabaloo, after unintentionally convincing an entire website that i was gay by just being logical...dont u think i would just fucking come out already if i was gay? i dont need to prove to anyone that im straight and that i like chicks...so it doesnt matter, but i will say this (again).. its clear to me now why the people with brains on this website stay out of threads like this...

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 06:08 PM
yeah I dont understand that dusk guy and UnequivocallyCorrect trying to passionatly defend gays on some politically correct shit...hahahaha thats all bulshit...they are being duped by satan,he has blinded them to the truth and they don`t even know it...there is no political correctness in this issue , there is only right and wrong..here peep the truth.


Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

peace be with you
hasnt anyone told you? JESUS IS FUCKING DEAD, YOU MORON!! Satan is an excuse for u cocksucking christians to commit acts of evil....dont u see? who wrote the bible? who created this website? who are you? blood and 130 pounds of pure dickhead.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 06:10 PM
Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

peace be with you
:?

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 06:12 PM
you live in san fransisco b!!!! gay capitol of the world!!!! that says it all!!!! if you werent tolerant to dick sucking and ass fucking you woulda skipped town a long time ago!!!!!

all these "straight" men getting sensitive over my personal opinion can stick their softend, artistic, girl hands, into whatever ass they want!!!!

now go finish cutting your "my son/friend/partner was killed, just because he was gay" promos!!!!

Yes, im tolerant!
Yes, most of my neighboors are too!
Yes, thats consistent with my last post!

No, im not upset about your anger I was just making fun of it...
Yes, my hands are soft, but their pretty big for girl hands and i keep them out of anyone's ass.
No, I dont have any promos to work on.

are you still angry?

food for thought
11-01-2009, 06:26 PM
eloels, im waitin for one of those e-interventions, or e-terventions...or internetventions....ya..

but seriously, laced and co. if i was gay...after all of this hullabaloo, after unintentionally convincing an entire website that i was gay by just being logical...dont u think i would just fucking come out already if i was gay? i dont need to prove to anyone that im straight and that i like chicks...so it doesnt matter, but i will say this (again).. its clear to me now why the people with brains on this website stay out of threads like this...

^thahah just be quiet

the gayness it oozing out your posts

angry!
11-01-2009, 06:28 PM
how often are you bullied at your junior highschool? do the big jocks who fuck hot cheerleaders beat the shit out of u on the daily? do they make u eat their shit? do they fuck your mother? why is it so important for u to feel like fuckin randy savage? ya your angry, because ur confused..and your frustrated by your lack of knowledge...and pussy.

save it for your auto-biography you uppity queer!!!!!

youre soft as fuck, words pierce right through your heart and expose your undeniably gay sensitivity!!!!!

i dont even pay attention to you, but youre on my nutsack like a wrinkle just because i have a opinion that opposes yours!!!! whos really frustrated here, go chase a rainbow and shut the fuck up already!!!!!

suck a dick nigga!!!! the cats that think they got the world all figured out, 9 times outta 10 dont know shit!!!!

food for thought
11-01-2009, 06:36 PM
hahahahahhaha

best new poster

dont even pay attention to you, but youre on my nutsack like a wrinkle

hahahahahah

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 06:55 PM
being duped by satan,he has blinded them to the truth and they don`t even know it...there is no political correctness in this issue , there is only right and wrong..here peep the truth.[/B]
Satan? im not scared of him. anyone who is might as well fear homosexuallity. But the satan card is played out if you dont believe molesting boys is fun.

Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."
Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."


1. GOD said "sexual relations" when talking about EVERY issue in Leviticus 18, but when he got to 18:22 he had to break it down in a metaphor for us simple folk?

2. If GOD MEANT "Sexual relations between two men" he would have wrote it. Your contemporary interpretation of "lie with a man" is wrong. Why would GOD write something different if he's talking about the same act?

3. God lubs ghays! But, if he doesn't your an idiot for supporting him anyway

The correct interpretation could be about threesomes and how there inst enough room on a bed for that many people. GOD is a man who describes inefficient bed space as "detestable".

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 07:10 PM
if i was gay...after all of this hullabaloo, after unintentionally convincing an entire website that i was gay by just being logical...dont u think i would just fucking come out already if i was gay?

u did already

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 07:11 PM
^thahah just be quiet

the gayness it oozing out your posts
ARE YOU FUCKING RETARTED?

damn, what a stupid question..

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 07:13 PM
u did already
ok then, lets just keep it that way...so now that im gay, should i just be ok with happy!'s posts? should i start hitting on him? i dont want to be to forward...i mean, i just got on his nutsack....lets see where things go!!:Y

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 07:19 PM
lmao, ok guys...i think angry!, alcatraz, and zooruka are convinced ur actually mindless dickfaces, lets just tell them theyre on scare tactics...and ill resume my masturbatory activities on eskimotube.

zooruka
11-01-2009, 07:24 PM
1. GOD said "sexual relations" when talking about EVERY issue in Leviticus 18, but when he got to 18:22 he had to break it down in a metaphor for us simple folk?

2. If GOD MEANT "Sexual relations between two men" he would have wrote it. Your contemporary interpretation of "lie with a man" is wrong. Why would GOD write something different if he's talking about the same act?

3. God lubs ghays! But, if he doesn't your an idiot for supporting him anyway

The correct interpretation could be about threesomes and how there inst enough room on a bed for that many people. GOD is man who describes inefficient bed space as "detestable".


dude if you don`t accept those simple verse`s in leviticus then I will give you one out of the new testement.


Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." (NIV) (http://christianteens.about.com/od/versionsofthebible/p/NIV.htm)

and if that isnt enough proof just remember this ,this sin against nature is so abominable that for it alone the cities of sodom & gomorrah were destroyed by virtue of the divine judgment of GOD.

dude you can twist it all you want but according to GOD ALMIGHT homosexuality is wrong !!!!! always has and always will be kid.

Also Im not scared of satan because he is a defeated enemy and I have GOD on my side.... but I do understand there is a war going on and I am a solider of GOD ...shit Im in engaging the enemy right now debating with you....but you my freind are just being used as a pawn of satan, but I will pray for you, that you will come to see the truth and the nature of the enemy so you won`t be decived by his lies.


peace be with you !

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 08:55 PM
Prof Zooruka.... you have earned yourself far more respect than a lot of the other posters i have encountered on wucorp. I appreciate the responses and how you consider me an "enemy" that your engaged with. I also think your attempt at teaching people is very commendable. I will hold back on jokes and insults so hopefully we can learn a lot from each other. Also, I will try not to twist your words.


[I]Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."

I think this passage is incredibly vague unless I have homosexuality on the mind. Shameful lusts.... Does this mean the Shameful lust for companionship? Not of the sexual kind of companionship. In other words...

Can a man lust for another mans company?? I don't see why not. Its not like a wanna make out we're just bros....


and if that isnt enough proof just remember this ,this sin against nature is so abominable that for it alone the cities of sodom & gomorrah were destroyed by virtue of the divine judgment of GOD.

GOD did destroy them for the sin's of those who inhabited it. But i havent read anything where the sins against Sodom&Gomorrah where "poop pushn"


dude you can twist it all you want but according to GOD ALMIGHT homosexuality is wrong !!!!! always has and always will be kid.

Is it reasonable to view GOD as sympathetic to the hardships and self-hatred a homosexual christian goes through?

Longbongcilvaringz
11-01-2009, 09:30 PM
save it for your auto-biography you uppity queer!!!!!

youre soft as fuck, words pierce right through your heart and expose your undeniably gay sensitivity!!!!!

i dont even pay attention to you, but youre on my nutsack like a wrinkle just because i have a opinion that opposes yours!!!! whos really frustrated here, go chase a rainbow and shut the fuck up already!!!!!

suck a dick nigga!!!! the cats that think they got the world all figured out, 9 times outta 10 dont know shit!!!!

haha.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 09:49 PM
ya i really got owned, in the ass.

5hundred&one
11-01-2009, 09:56 PM
^ lol @ your sig being dedicated to you getting sonned. you must like being dominated by other men, huh? eloels..

food for thought
11-01-2009, 10:18 PM
hahahahaha

Dusk is gay as hell.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 10:21 PM
ya, gagged and all...501 men is my record.

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 10:22 PM
i'm sure dusk is really glad he finally came out to someone ... even if it was a 'joke' ... because of us, dusk can sleep better at night (no homo)

Uncle Steezo
11-01-2009, 10:30 PM
from TIME

Why Some Animals (and People) Are Gay

By John Cloud Friday, Jun. 19, 2009




We have known for at least a decade that hundreds of animal species — including birds, reptiles, mollusks and, of course, humans — engage in same-gender sexual acts. But no one is quite sure why. After all, same-sex couplings don't usually result in offspring. (I say usually because when male marine snails pair with other males, one partner conveniently changes sex, allowing for reproduction.) Evolutionarily speaking, homosexuality should have disappeared long ago.





A yearlong study just completed at the University of California at Riverside offers several fascinating competing theories about why same-gender sexual behavior has endured. And although it's gay-pride month — and the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots that sparked the gay-rights movement — not all the theories will give same-gender-loving humans a reason to celebrate. (See the top 10 animal stories of 2007.)


One particularly charged finding is that in most species besides humans, same-gender pairings rarely lead to lifelong relationships. In other words, when one attractive bonobo male eyes another in a lovely patch of Congo swamp forest, they occasionally kiss and then move on to other oral pleasures, but they don't bother anyone afterward about trying to legalize their right to an open-banana-bar ceremony. In fact, they are likely to move on to girl bonobos: most animals that engage in same-gender sex acts do so only when an opposite-sex partner is unavailable.


And yet the study's authors, Nathan Bailey and Marlene Zuk of UC Riverside's biology department, report some exceptions, like the laysan albatross. Last year, researchers studying a Hawaiian colony of albatrosses found that nearly a third of all the couples involved two females who courted and then shared parenting responsibilities. (Albatrosses don't have U-Hauls, so no lesbian jokes, please.) Male chinstrap penguins also form long-term relationships, at least in captivity. And some male bighorn sheep will mount females only after the females adopt male-like behaviors. (Watch a gay marriage wedding video.)


What explains all these variances? Here are some hypotheses I collected from Bailey and Zuk's paper as well as from some of their original sources:


1. The boys-in-the-locker-room theory. Any guy who played sports in high school knows that homoerotic jokes and towel-snapping are an underlying part of the subculture. Similarly, male bottlenose dolphins use same-sex sexual behavior to maintain and strengthen their social relationships — although dolphins are far more explicit about their homosexual play, regularly mounting one another and (hide the kids' ears here) sticking their noses into certain boy-dolphin parts. (Very regularly: roughly half of male dolphin sex occurs with other males.) Among bonobos, same-sex sexual behavior is also thought to ease social tension and facilitate reconciliation. And among garter snakes, male-on-male contact may allow some solitary males to thermoregulate and, therefore, survive.



2. The emasculation theory. Some male animals might mount other males as a way of denying them access to the ladies. For instance, as the Journal of Natural History noted in 2006, male dung flies often must compete violently to impregnate females. In those situations, "the most sensible strategy for beating a competitor in the race to an arriving female would be to mount him and remain in situ for as long as possible." Then, when the lady dung fly finally sails by, the aggressor male can pull himself out from the dominated male and — because he is on top — get above to the female faster.
3. The "oops" theory. Among insects, same-sex sexual behavior is usually a case of mistaken identity. Male fruit flies, for instance, may romance other males because they lack a gene that enables them to distinguish between sexes. Even more surprising, male toads can't tell the difference between girl toads and boy toads, so males will routinely embrace other males, although the subordinate ones are equipped with a call that quickly results in the dominant male releasing. In other species, the "straight" males get tricked by other wily straight males who dress in animal drag: male goodeid fish, for instance, sometimes have a black spot that resembles a spot that females get when pregnant. Dominant males then court them rather than fight with them. While the dominant guys are busy courting the subordinate, ladylike fish, the latter are able to "sneak copulations with females," as Bailey and Zuk write. I'm going to dub this the Hugh Grant Theory: it's not always the most masculine guy who gets the most girls.


4. The let's-see-how-this-thing-works theory. Younger animals (particularly males, and including humans) sometimes engage in same-sex sexual behavior as practice, which may improve their reproductive success when they are ready for a heterosexual relationship later. Fruit flies who experiment with other members of the same sex as youngsters may have more baby fruit flies later on than those who don't experiment.


5. The two-plus-one theory. Among flour beetles, males routinely force themselves on other males. According to Bailey and Zuk, there's some evidence that sperm deposited during this male beetle rape is sometimes transferred to a female later on, increasing the chances that she will have offspring.
What all these theories have in common is that same-sex sexual activity is either an accident or a quirky genetic method of helping males impregnate females. Which raises the evolutionary question of why men and women who are exclusive gay and lesbian exist. One answer is that exclusive gays and lesbians are a relatively new creation: the concept of exclusive homosexuality barely existed before modernity; even a century ago, most same-sex-attracted men and women got married and had kids. (Read "Do Monkeys Pay for Sex?")
As Bailey, Zuk and many others have pointed out, no one has offered an adequate evolutionary explanation for the relatively recent development of exclusive homosexuality among humans. In January, the journal Evolution and Human Behavior published a paper exploring the idea that certain alleles increase the likelihood of homosexuality by blocking the effect of androgens during fetal development. Having all those alleles hampers the masculinization of some parts of the brain that affect personality, making you gay, the theory goes. Brothers of gay men who have only some of the alleles would turn out straight but less aggressive than typical guys. And because those brothers exhibit less psychopathology, they would attract more women and therefore have more kids. It was a provocative theory, but it turned out not to be proved: gay men's brothers don't actually have more kids than straight men's brothers do.


So we're stuck at square one. As the 40th anniversary of Stonewall approaches, the question that Alan Miller and Satoshi Kanazawa ask in their 2007 book about evolutionary psychology, Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters, has never been more relevant: Will "the liberation of homosexuals, which allows them to come out of the closet and not pretend to be straight" actually turn out to "contribute to the end of homosexuality?" We may not know for a thousand years, but it's a great question.

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 10:36 PM
i'm sure dusk is really glad he finally came out to someone ... even if it was a 'joke' ... because of us, dusk can sleep better at night (no homo)
ur in the top 5 gayest people on this site...:beer:

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 10:39 PM
im gonna pray to pac tonight, for u guys.

zooruka
11-01-2009, 10:47 PM
Prof Zooruka.... you have earned yourself far more respect than a lot of the other posters i have encountered on wucorp. I appreciate the responses and how you consider me an "enemy" that your engaged with. I also think your attempt at teaching people is very commendable. I will hold back on jokes and insults so hopefully we can learn a lot from each other. Also, I will try not to twist your words.?

if your being serious the thank you.



I think this passage is incredibly vague unless I have homosexuality on the mind. Shameful lusts.... Does this mean the Shameful lust for companionship? Not of the sexual kind of companionship. In other words...

Can a man lust for another mans company?? I don't see why not. Its not like a wanna make out we're just bros....?

The passage is pretty straight forward if you read it.



GOD did destroy them for the sin's of those who inhabited it. But i havent read anything where the sins against Sodom&Gomorrah where "poop pushn"?


The people of Sodom and Gomorrah engaged in depraved homosexual acts. God sent angels to the city of Sodom to see how bad things were: "Then the Lord said to Abraham, 'There are terrible accusations against Sodom and Gomorrah, and their sin is very great. I must go down to find out whether or not the accusations which I have heard are true.' (Genesis 18:20-21). On arriving in Sodom, the angels were met by Abraham's nephew Lot. Knowing the men of the city were sexual deviants, Lot urged these two visitors to stay at his home: "He kept urging them, and finally they went with him to his house. Lot ordered his servants to bake some bread and prepare a fine meal for the guests. When it was ready, they ate it." (Genesis 19:3). The magnitude of how sinful the men of Sodom and Gomorrah were is seen by their blatant disregard for committing a shocking act upon two men they didn't know: "Before the guests went to bed, the men of Sodom surrounded the house. All the men of the city, both young and old, were there. They called out to Lot and asked, 'Where are the men who came to stay with you tonight? Bring them out to us!' The men of Sodom wanted to have "sex" with them." (Genesis 19:4-5).


so you see yes they where committing homosexual acts because they wanted to have sex with the angels who came and stayed with lot.


Is it reasonable to view GOD as sympathetic to the hardships and self-hatred a homosexual christian goes through?

firstly you cant be a homosexual and a christian..those that are gay and call themselves christians are liars...but yes GOD does have sympathy for homosexuals, but is disgusted by there lifestyle,he wants them to stop what they are doing and repent of there sins and be saved.



dude stop being fooled by this so called political correctness mumbo jumbo and trying to sympathize with what homosexuals do under the guise of human rights, this issue is not the same as being black or chinese or oppressed by war..what gays do is wrong full stop, I mean you don`t even have to be christian to know that sticking your dick in another mans ass is seriously wrong and unnatural.

peace be with you !

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 10:51 PM
isnt it politically correct to be christian? dont try to act like u arent looking like a fuckin idiot in this thread..lmao...hey, if it takes me saying im gay to make some sense in here..so be it.

food for thought
11-01-2009, 11:04 PM
http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f332/chpmnksgosplat/boondocksRiley.jpg

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 11:08 PM
http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic60169_8.gif

couldnt disagree more.

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 11:37 PM
I am sincere when I give you props because you try to convince me with credible evidence and questions. I am always open to points of view, it helps me get a better understanding and sometimes I change my mind.

The passage is pretty straight forward if you read it.

The people of Sodom and Gomorrah engaged in depraved homosexual acts. God sent angels to the city of Sodom to see how bad things were: "Then the Lord said to Abraham, 'There are terrible accusations against Sodom and Gomorrah, and their sin is very great. I must go down to find out whether or not the accusations which I have heard are true.' (Genesis 18:20-21). On arriving in Sodom, the angels were met by Abraham's nephew Lot. Knowing the men of the city were sexual deviants, Lot urged these two visitors to stay at his home: "He kept urging them, and finally they went with him to his house. Lot ordered his servants to bake some bread and prepare a fine meal for the guests. When it was ready, they ate it." (Genesis 19:3). The magnitude of how sinful the men of Sodom and Gomorrah were is seen by their blatant disregard for committing a shocking act upon two men they didn't know: "Before the guests went to bed, the men of Sodom surrounded the house. All the men of the city, both young and old, were there. They called out to Lot and asked, 'Where are the men who came to stay with you tonight? Bring them out to us!' The men of Sodom wanted to have "sex" with them." (Genesis 19:4-5).


It is clear A sexual act was part of GOD's decision. But, the people of Sodom came out to rape the men. Man-Man rape is not a part of homosexually. It is the Rape GOD is condemning.

There appears to be a lot in the bible about man-man issues. But none of it CLEARLY condemns homosexuality. Man-man relationships we're a stronger part of society in the old times. These men wern't gay but the "Poker Nights" were a lot more common amongst all men. I have read the bible and all instances where GOD hates on gays can be mis-interpretations of GOD hates men who party all night, God hates orgies and GOD hates rapist. Is it not fair to consider he intended to condemn those issues instead of homosexuality?



firstly you cant be a homosexual and a christian..those that are gay and call themselves christians are liars...but yes GOD does have sympathy for homosexuals, but is disgusted by there lifestyle,he wants them to stop what they are doing and repent of there sins and be saved.


If I was gay and trying to end my sinner ways to become christian what exactly should I do to make GOD not disgusted with my lifestyle? Seriously where is the line drawn?


dude stop being fooled by this so called political correctness mumbo jumbo and trying to sympathize with what homosexuals do under the guise of human rights, this issue is not the same as being black or chinese or oppressed by war..what gays do is wrong full stop, I mean you don`t even have to be christian to know that sticking your dick in another mans ass is seriously wrong and unnatural.

I cannot agree with you until i question what you say and it makes sense. Im trying to keep the correctness mumbo down but everyone needs a clear understanding If they to rightfully take a stand for/against something.

I would like to know if your beliefs come solely from the bible or do they stem from an organization? Maybe local church? combination?

Bob

oDoUoSoKo
11-01-2009, 11:40 PM
debate is no longer necessary...god has deemed all these faggotrons to be smiteworthy...

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-01-2009, 11:45 PM
http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic60169_8.gif

couldnt disagree more.

Seriously... I been here like a week and seen a 1:10 intelligent to ignorant post ratio from these guys...

*waits for "BUwhahahahaha" or "fag!" response*
*will die holding breath for a "non-ignorant" response*

ALCATRAZ
11-01-2009, 11:47 PM
im gonna pray to pac tonight, for u guys.
lol u read my blog

zooruka
11-02-2009, 12:01 AM
I am sincere when I give you props because you try to convince me with credible evidence and questions. I am always open to points of view, it helps me get a better understanding and sometimes I change my mind.

cool I hope you change your mind about homosexuality.



There appears to be a lot in the bible about man-man issues. But none of it CLEARLY condemns homosexuality.

umm the verses I gave you do condemn homosexuality

Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." (NIV) (http://christianteens.about.com/od/versionsofthebible/p/NIV.htm)


this verse clearly is talking about homosexuality and says that people will be punished for it...I dont know how you could come to any other conclusion.


Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."


this verse is also clear in its meaning, the word lie with a women means to have sex with her, thats just the way they use to say it back then, but its meaning clear.


Man-man relationships we're a stronger part of society in the old times. These men wern't gay but the "Poker Nights" were a lot more common amongst all men..

God dont have a problem with men hanging out, but those verses are talking about sexual relations between men ...its just you don`t want to believe that for some reason ????






If I was gay and trying to end my sinner ways to become christian what exactly should I do to make GOD not disgusted with my lifestyle? Seriously where is the line drawn?.

confess your sins to GOD and repent and continue them no more, and accept christ as your lord and savior...then you would be a christian...pretty simple !



I cannot agree with you until i question what you say and it makes sense. Im trying to keep the correctness mumbo down but everyone needs a clear understanding If they to rightfully take a stand for/against something.

I would like to know if your beliefs come solely from the bible or do they stem from an organization? Maybe local church? combination?

Bob

yes my belief comes from the bible ....GOD says homosexuality is wrong so thats what I follow, but that doesn`t mean naturally I didn`t think it was wrong to begin with...but GOD confirmed that to me.


peace be with you !

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 12:15 AM
i concur^^ hope all those cocksuckers burn...im putting together an army of fellow christians to take down my lesbian aunt...god has spoken.

UnequivocallyCorrect
11-02-2009, 12:34 AM
umm the verses I gave you do condemn homosexuality

Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." (NIV) (http://christianteens.about.com/od/versionsofthebible/p/NIV.htm)

this verse clearly is talking about homosexuality and says that people will be punished for it...I dont know how you could come to any other conclusion.

GOD is condemning the un-natural desire for women to leave their homes/children and abandoning their natural motherly duties.(To become desperate housewives) Their Shameful lust is gambling, cheating on their spouse, spending time drinking/getting high with friends instead of being a Parent?? Are these not the same UNNATURAL shameful lusts that people desire and GOD condemns???

God doesn't like a "guys/girls night out" he thinks they contribute to a perversion that causes damage to the family because the person is neglecting their family.


Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

this verse is also clear in its meaning, the word lie with a women means to have sex with her, thats just the way they use to say it back then, but its meaning clear.


Yes "lie" means sex. No issues there. But "as" means "while/during"... (ex: Non-ignorants like to beat off "AS" they read this thread)

"Do not lie with a man "while" one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Simple question: you said "its meaning clear." can we ATLEAST agree it is not "clear"?



confess your sins to GOD and repent and continue them no more, and accept christ as your lord and savior...then you would be a christian...pretty simple !


Thats just the thing. Details.

Can me and my "non-gay" friends hang out?
Can me and my "non-gay" friends throw a slumber party?
Can me and my "non-gay" friends hold hands?
Can me and my "non-gay" friends sit close when we're watching a scary movie?
Can me and my "non-gay" friends go fishing, have a few beers and then put our arms around each other and talk about how much we love each others company?

I want to know what offends GOD if I am to be a good christian.



yes my belief comes from the bible ....GOD says homosexuality is wrong so thats what I follow, but that doesn`t mean naturally I didn`t think it was wrong to begin with...but GOD confirmed that to me.

this guy has balls and he doesn't give up (thank god your not another socal][retard.)

Visionz
11-02-2009, 12:47 AM
i concur^^ hope all those cocksuckers burn...im putting together an army of fellow christians to take down my lesbian aunt...god has spoken.
be sure to tell them that the sun revolves around the earth as well. It that wasn't the case then the bible wouldn't have said it.

ALCATRAZ
11-02-2009, 04:22 AM
NgWn7zbgxZ4

Ghost In The 'Lac
11-02-2009, 06:20 AM
i dont need to prove to anyone that im straight and that i like chicks...

^hahahahaha that sounded suspect as HELL

"i like chicks" hahahahahahaha



ok then, lets just keep it that way...so now that im gay, should i just be ok with happy!'s posts? should i start hitting on him? i dont want to be to forward...i mean, i just got on his nutsack....lets see where things go!!:Y

ya i really got owned, in the ass.

ya, gagged and all...501 men is my record.

















































http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd218/CJanssen-Wishaupt/sexiness.gif

Mumm Ra
11-02-2009, 08:46 AM
hey - I have a serious question for Prof Zooruka

given that you told me it is against your faith to resist wickedness -
if a man tried to forcefully butt-rape you, would you in fact NOT resist him - AT ALL?
or would you......turn the other...... cheek?

I will be anxiously awaiting your answer
- Mumm

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 08:49 AM
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd218/CJanssen-Wishaupt/sexiness.gif


gets more vagina then u have ever smelled. god has spoken.

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 08:51 AM
when i said i liked chicks...i meant literally chicks...we sacrifice them at my church for easter...peeps give me the runs.

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 08:58 AM
btw...if u havent figured it out, ive left my faggot lifestyle behind...i was sucking a big black cock, and jesus spoke to me...he said hed been watching all those times i beat off to gavin and jamie foxx...and was kind of pissed...so i told him id leave those evil ways in the past...he punished me accordingly, and then told me a few people on here who are actually gay...but i wont out them..however they will burn.........

Poetic Wun
11-02-2009, 09:02 AM
Lacey throwin homo rocks while livin in a house of Jamie Foxx's dick?
lol aight

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 09:08 AM
ya...that house is gonna burn..like herpes.

5hundred&one
11-02-2009, 11:24 AM
look nigga, you can change your fake e-persona and pretend to make a statement as many times as you want; nothing will change the fact that you've posted in this thread more than anybody else.

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 11:26 AM
ok nigga...so what

check two
11-02-2009, 11:27 AM
Seriously... I been here like a week and seen a 1:10 intelligent to ignorant post ratio from these guys...

*waits for "BUwhahahahaha" or "fag!" response*
*will die holding breath for a "non-ignorant" response*

You're nothing but a fat, out of shape, San Francisco sweathog. Hit the music porkchop.

zooruka
11-02-2009, 05:44 PM
hey - I have a serious question for Prof Zooruka

given that you told me it is against your faith to resist wickedness -
if a man tried to forcefully butt-rape you, would you in fact NOT resist him - AT ALL?
or would you......turn the other...... cheek?

I will be anxiously awaiting your answer
- Mumm

I have done some investigating and while I will admit Im not 100% sure about your question, this is what I have come up with.

In the sermon on the Mount, Jesus' teaching about "turning the other cheek" was in response to a clear case of petty annoyances that were insulting. Nothing in these verses mandate a refusal to protect yourself or your loved ones when life itself is being threatened, because Jesus said if somone slaps you not if someone is trying to kill you !!!!


but


with that said Jesus and the apostles did not run away or try to defend themselves with armed resistance when there lifes where in danger, but Jesus did instruct them to run away if they are being persecuted, also paul heard about a plot to kill him by asassins he spoke to the authourities to get out of it....but remember in the end of the day JESUS went to his death without resisting at all, and the apostles all went to there deaths honourably and did not rufuse but remaind faithful to GOD.



so to honestly answer your question I would have to say Im undecided..but Idealy I think not resisting is the right thing to do,and leave it up to the G-man to sort out, but wether I actually did that is another thing.


peace be with you !

peace be with you !

Visionz
11-02-2009, 05:55 PM
I have done some investigating and while I will admit Im not 100% sure about your question, this is what I have come up with.

In the sermon on the Mount, Jesus' teaching about "turning the other cheek" was in response to a clear case of petty annoyances that were insulting. Nothing in these verses mandate a refusal to protect yourself or your loved ones when life itself is being threatened, because Jesus said if somone slaps you not if someone is trying to kill you !!!!


but


with that said Jesus and the apostles did not run away or try to defend themselves with armed resistance when there lifes where in danger, but Jesus did instruct them to run away if they are being persecuted, also paul heard about a plot to kill him by asassins he spoke to the authourities to get out of it....but remember in the end of the day JESUS went to his death without resisting at all, and the apostles all went to there deaths honourably and did not rufuse but remaind faithful to GOD.



so to honestly answer your question I would have to say Im undecided..but Idealy I think not resisting is the right thing to do,and leave it up to the G-man to sort out, but wether I actually did that is another thing.


peace be with you !

peace be with you !
^due to inability to think for himself, 'ruka would let a man rape him in the ass.....WOW!!!!!!

of course with no resistance offered can it really be considered rape?

Jutzu-Lo-Killer
11-02-2009, 05:57 PM
Why homosexuality should be abolished (!? Cheks inside.)



http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/meretouched2-1.jpg



lolololololololololollololololololololololol

Jutzu-Lo-Killer
11-02-2009, 05:58 PM
I have done some investigating and while I will admit Im not 100% sure about your question, this is what I have come up with.

In the sermon on the Mount, Jesus' teaching about "turning the other cheek" was in response to a clear case of petty annoyances that were insulting. Nothing in these verses mandate a refusal to protect yourself or your loved ones when life itself is being threatened, because Jesus said if somone slaps you not if someone is trying to kill you !!!!


but


with that said Jesus and the apostles did not run away or try to defend themselves with armed resistance when there lifes where in danger, but Jesus did instruct them to run away if they are being persecuted, also paul heard about a plot to kill him by asassins he spoke to the authourities to get out of it....but remember in the end of the day JESUS went to his death without resisting at all, and the apostles all went to there deaths honourably and did not rufuse but remaind faithful to GOD.



so to honestly answer your question I would have to say Im undecided..but Idealy I think not resisting is the right thing to do,and leave it up to the G-man to sort out, but wether I actually did that is another thing.


peace be with you !

peace be with you !

lol

insane

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 06:32 PM
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb165/skampoe/meretouched2-1.jpg







unacceptible.

Mumm Ra
11-02-2009, 09:44 PM
^due to inability to think for himself, 'ruka would let a man rape him in the ass.....WOW!!!!!!

of course with no resistance offered can it really be considered rape?
HAHAHAH!!! oh snap
I knew the dude was going to admit it - it's just even more hilarious once I got to read it from him

prof: has mental breakdowns when women make eye contact with him
prof: would not resist a butt-raping

i think im starting to see where this is heading..............

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 09:48 PM
hey, watch where u throwin that prof around now...eloels.

Mumm Ra
11-02-2009, 09:55 PM
hey man - watch what homosexual person you mold your name after

zooruka
11-02-2009, 09:58 PM
HAHAHAH!!! oh snap
I knew the dude was going to admit it - it's just even more hilarious once I got to read it from him

prof: has mental breakdowns when women make eye contact with him
prof: would not resist a butt-raping

i think im starting to see where this is heading..............


look what I think basically is being said is try and avoid things wherever possible but if there is no way of getting out of it, and if you are going to abandon your faith then just accept it whatever the situation and leave it up to God to sort out, dont try and take revenge.


peace be with you !

Mumm Ra
11-02-2009, 10:07 PM
yeah, we get it prof -
you would gladly accept a butt-raping

in the name of Jesus, of course

oDoUoSoKo
11-02-2009, 10:08 PM
hey man - watch what homosexual person you mold your name after
lmao..well, thats just satan in disguise right there kid..im the real deal HOLYfield.

food for thought
11-02-2009, 10:08 PM
haha

Ghost In The 'Lac
11-03-2009, 07:23 AM
Wow iv been gone for a day and Dusk has had a full on breakdown. You really cannot call this man a faggot.

For someone who so passionately and continually defends the rights of gay people like no straight man ive ever seen, he sure does get over excited when you call him a faggot.

Dusk, your done. Stop posting in here. Its only going to get worse and worse if it can possibly get worse.


Who Posted?

Total Posts: 219

User Name Posts
Dusk 36
SKAM-POPE 15
UnequivocallyCorrect 15
ALCATRAZ 14
Socialist][Revolt 14
501 Gold 13
Sean Bateman 11
prof zooruka 9
GHOSTLACED 9
food for thought 8
Mumm Ra 5
check two 5
James Crow ESQ 5
Drunken Monk 4
TSA 4
Chevy Chase 4
Huggahu Akbar 3
Teh KillaBee 3
Art Vandelay 3


And your clearly not the smartest because I didnt post that Prince gif because I thought Prince was gay, you fucking colorful faggot LOL.

Longbongcilvaringz
11-03-2009, 09:10 AM
Jesus price, my numbers ain't looking great neither.

Thanks for that demonstration man, things are much clearer now my friend.

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 02:46 PM
ya ur right, ill stop posting in here...OH damn...and also consider the possibility that u want it to seem like im crazy, or passionate about this shit..as opposed to all this shit being hilarious to me...like this prof zoofucka fellow, ranting on and aon about zombies and ass fucking..LMAO. peas bee wiff few

5hundred&one
11-03-2009, 03:08 PM
almost everybody else on that list made their 1st post of the thread on the first or second page. Dusk didn't start posting until page 7. that means that out of the last 100 or so posts, Dusk has made roughly 1/3 of them or an average of 4 posts per page, compared to the second highest number, SKAM-POPE with 15, which is an average of 1 post per page.

and it has all been in the name of gay rights

he's totally straight though.

food for thought
11-03-2009, 03:17 PM
haha

and then he tried to logically explain why the way he is acting is not homosexual suspect behavior

thats the best part

lol and then he changed his sigs 3 or four times and changed his USERNAME HAHAHAHAHA

lol

Mumm Ra
11-03-2009, 03:31 PM
lol and then he changed his sigs 3 or four times and changed his USERNAME HAHAHAHAHA


he changed his username based off a person who openly admits he wouldn't stop another man from raping him in the ass lolololl

i got nothin against him but the irony of the situation is funny

Ghost In The 'Lac
11-03-2009, 03:45 PM
ya ur right, ill stop posting in here...OH damn...and also consider the possibility that u want it to seem like im crazy, or passionate about this shit..as opposed to all this shit being hilarious to me...like this prof zoofucka fellow, ranting on and aon about zombies and ass fucking..LMAO. peas bee wiff few

hhahahaa look at this gay rambling incoherently now

zooruka
11-03-2009, 05:17 PM
he changed his username based off a person who openly admits he wouldn't stop another man from raping him in the ass lolololl

i got nothin against him but the irony of the situation is funny

firstly I didnt say I would take an ass raping ???? I said I was undecided on what the scriptures where saying, and said Idealy people should not retaliate if someone wrongs you, BUT I DID SAY YOU SHOULD AVOID TROUBLE WHENEVER AND WHEREVER POSSIBLE...also mumm ra how old are you ???? 15 or some shit because you sure act like it.


oh and DUSK actually changed his user name before I repsonded to your comments....must be all the anti gay statements I made...got him upset ????

:W


peace be with you !!!

food for thought
11-03-2009, 05:20 PM
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3289/2716384364_eab5d33baf.jpg?v=0

zooruka
11-03-2009, 05:26 PM
yo peace food, I hope we can be homies or at least cool ( no homo)


peace be with you !

check two
11-03-2009, 05:34 PM
Peace

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/lionell78/2716384364_eab5d33baf.jpg?t=1257291230

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 05:45 PM
lmao...i really dont know how to further stress that i dont give a fuck whether u think im gay or not...if im telling u im not gay and u wont accept that..ok, but its like..wtf do u want me to do? be gay? i fuckin did that already...if im not gay, i cant fuckin be gay...i wont admit its suspect to me, but obviously its suspect to u guys because ur either homophobes or have narrow views on the subject..so w/e, i changed my name because i support christianity and its views on homosexuality...but prof zooruka is a waffle cone.

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 05:48 PM
at a certain point all i can do is humor the idea, because ur collective views are hilarious...ive said before and/or ill say it again..i have gay family member and friends..so how could i possibly be ok with what u guys are saying?

۞StarPriest۞
11-03-2009, 05:51 PM
I have not followed this debate and I don't give a flying fuck about the issue at hand, but I would like to note that Dusk's sig looks badass (and I'm not religious).

zooruka
11-03-2009, 05:52 PM
I dont think your gay dusk....and know you said you have gay family members I see where your passionate defense of them comes from, but if anything if you love them ( which you clearly do by your defense of gays in this thread) you should try and help them by showing them that what they are doing is wrong...instead of letting them live in sin.


yo dusk peace


peace be with you !

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 05:54 PM
i agree...but jesus is less concerned with killing my 60+ year old lesbian aunt...and more concerned with epicly mind fuckin the shit out of ur feeble brain. its obvious that my aunt is in the wrong..she should not do what she truly wants to in her heart...ill kill the bitch myself.

Mumm Ra
11-03-2009, 05:55 PM
firstly I didnt say I would take an ass raping ???? I said I was undecided on what the scriptures where saying, and said Idealy people should not retaliate if someone wrongs you, BUT I DID SAY YOU SHOULD AVOID TROUBLE WHENEVER AND WHEREVER POSSIBLE...also mumm ra how old are you ???? 15 or some shit because you sure act like it.



hey prof, check this out -

if a man tried to forcefully butt-rape you, would you in fact NOT resist him - AT ALL?
Idealy I think not resisting is the right thing to do
stop trying to put vaseline on your ass-raping views, it's not gonna make it any less painful

about my age - I'm old enough to know that I should defend myself from an ass-rape

thank you very much

zooruka
11-03-2009, 05:57 PM
whatever man


peace mumm ra


peace

۞StarPriest۞
11-03-2009, 05:59 PM
My real question is why you're all so obsessed with homosexuality. All of you. I mean seriously what the fuck. There's like 10 threads that either directly or indirectly deal with the subject right here on page 1 of Gen Chat. If you're all actually as comfortable with your sexuality -- queer or straight arrow -- as you say you are, you shouldn't feel the need to have extensive, childish arguments and insult-trading circle jerks.

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 06:00 PM
crazy shit is...i kno alot of u agree with me, but are fuckin chicken..and kno that if u say.."yo 501 gold, ur an idiot...yo angry!!! your being completely irrational" ur gonna be called a faggot, so u stay quiet, or laugh at me....jesus is watchin

zooruka
11-03-2009, 06:00 PM
My real question is why you're all so obsessed with homosexuality. All of you. I mean seriously what the fuck. There's like 10 threads that either directly or indirectly deal with the subject right here on page 1 of Gen Chat. If you're all actually as comfortable with your sexuality -- queer or straight arrow -- as you say you are, you shouldn't feel the need to have extensive, childish arguments and insult-trading circle jerks.


its not that we are uncomfortable with our sexuality... its just we want people to know homosexuality is wrong !!!!!


dont get it twisted yall

peace be with you !

KLIION JENSEN
11-03-2009, 06:24 PM
i wont admit its suspect to me, but obviously its suspect to u guys because ur either homophobes or have narrow views on the subject..

i'm not homophobic, "homo-phobic" would imply that i have a fear of homosexuals, i have no fear of homosexuals, if you are a homosexual, by all means do you, just dont try to do me cos i'll cut you.....

about my age - I'm old enough to know that I should defend myself from an ass-rape

truth, even women know that shit, and its ok to bumfuck women......

jesus is watchin

Jesus dont exist

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 06:41 PM
neither does the gangsta version of u that will cut me..lmao and eloels @ u for being the only person left on the planet who thinks thats what homophobia still means.

KLIION JENSEN
11-03-2009, 07:16 PM
^ dont have to be gangsta to carve someone up....just properly motivated....

so, just what does homophobia mean to you ??

5hundred&one
11-03-2009, 07:16 PM
fear of a gay planet

food for thought
11-03-2009, 07:21 PM
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/lionell78/2716384364_eab5d33baf.jpg?t=1257291230

hahahahahahhaahhaaaaaaaahaha

oDoUoSoKo
11-03-2009, 07:23 PM
fear of a gay planet
:eggy:

RALPH WIGGUM
11-04-2009, 04:49 AM
Theres a difference between bein gay and bein a faggot.

Uncle Steezo
11-04-2009, 09:27 AM
Theres a difference between bein gay and bein a faggot.

thats the 2nd non-iggy post that i've read that wasn't ignorant.

repped.

but you lose two experience points for being french.

Sheep Shifter
11-06-2009, 06:50 AM
So far, enemy of the people:

- Angry!
- Gavin
- Dusk (satire?)
- Proof Zooruka
- Killion Jensen
- OriginalAsiatic"Black"Dan

Who are the other reactionaries on the forum talkin homophobic shit?

Longbongcilvaringz
11-06-2009, 08:30 AM
Gavin
Dusk
Prof Zooruka
Killion Jensen (Fearz duh gayz)