![]() |
The Language of Math
i looked at this for the first time and only saw the downward arrows, and said to myself "oh shit, i never seen that before". then i said to myself, "no big deal, there is usually a pattern in math"....but then i saw the arrows going upward and said "WTF!"
it's a fucked up, but liberating feeling knowing that you was stupid all this time - but it makes you wonder, how many more things are hidden in plain sight like this. ADD On Math http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7...5822593055.jpg add the double digit answers and get 9 lmao - basic fuckin math - dam - i was a dumb fuck all this time ? i ain't the only one though |
|
[(2n + 6) / 2 ] - n = 3
|
Quote:
BWHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAH you must have went to a fucking shitty school. We got taught this in 3rd-4th grade when we were 7 year old wtf? I'm not even gonna get into how 1+1=3 cos that might just blow your mind!!! |
yeah don't
i'm too retarded to be shown these wonders |
Here's something you may not have known, Optimus Prime in the transformers is quite a smart name cos Optimus is 7 characters long and 7 is a prime number.
http://i.imgur.com/UmpOi.gif WOAH! |
i thought that 9x9 was 16 - when i found out that it was 13 i was angry
mr weinstein and mrs silvercroft lied to me THEY LIED TO ME ! |
PEACE,You should check out the books-"Number 9 The search for the sigma code" by Cecil Balmond and "The Enigma of Numbers" by Lance Storm,and "Is GOD a Mathematician" by Mario Livio.
|
I made a thread with what I thought was a great discovery of number patterns, but I guess kids learn it in middle school. I didn't.
http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=73460 |
wont include teh Fibonacci sequence in this as its next level ish...
but some nice background info... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincid...ia_oppositorum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_mathematics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieros_gamos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interes...doxical_nature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathema...rse_hypothesis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamathematics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_virtual_reality http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-phi...ith_philosophy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philoso...or_creative.3F http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philoso...gainst_realism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_outside_the_box |
i already knew this but when i saw the OP i wondered why that was and its actually pretty obvious and can b proven simply.
if u write all ur numbers in base x (OP says x=10 which is ofc the most commonly used base) and then use timetables of x-1 (OP says x-1=9) and then write out all the timetables u get 1(x-1)=(x-1) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 0 and the digit on the right will b (x-1) 2(x-1)=(2x-2) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 1 and the digit on the right will b (x-2) 3(x-1)=(3x-3) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 2 and the digit on the right will b (x-3) 4(x-1)=(4x-4) obviously cuz x is the base the digit on the left will b 3 and the digit on the right will b (x-4) and this can b repeated for all two digit numbers when multiplying a number which is 1 under the base. so eg if we skip to 7 times 9. so here were saying x=10 and (x-1)=9 and so 7 times 9=7(x-1)=7x-7 which means the left hand digit is 6 and the right hand digit is x-7 so we know the left hand digit is 6 and we now need to find out the right hand digit. right hand digit is (x-7) and substituting (x=10) gives us (10-7) which is 3. so the right hand digit is 3. putting these 2 facts together gives us the number 63. therefore 7 times 9=63 |
actually looking back on what i was saying its all quite a confusing format. i'll try a different format of |first digit||second digit|
so if we do it again 1(x-1)=x-1=|0||x-1| 2(x-1)=2x-2=|1||x-2| 3(x-1)=3x-3=|2||x-3| 4(x-1)=4x-4=|3||x-4| etc |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013 The Wu-Tang Corp. & shift-one