Wu-Tang Corp. - Official Site of the Wu-Tang Clan

Wu-Tang Corp. - Official Site of the Wu-Tang Clan (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Blacks and Indians are losers when it comes to building a great nation. (http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=118968)

IrOnMaN 10-13-2012 03:36 PM

Blacks and Indians are losers when it comes to building a great nation.
 


To state that African-Americans and Native Americans haven't built anything in history is down right a disgrace.

Then he goes on to say that black men have no honor because we are unable to construct a nation while other races are able to construct nations. We're weak and our women are the main providers.

Just listen to the video and you'll understand what I'm talking about.

EAGLE EYE 10-13-2012 04:03 PM

http://static.infowars.com/2012/07/i...at-legosa.jpeg
lol

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 05:20 PM

didnt watch the video but sub sahara african and native american nations r extremely primitive and barbaric. look at sub sahara africa today. its full of dictators who use a very outdated and backwards political system.

if columbus never entered the americas most of those places wouldve been extremely primitive.

but u can also say if the romans didnt conquer the celts in britain or other europeans those lands would also b extremely primitive.

im not exactly sure how african americans can build a nation if theyre slaves who entered into america. what kinda nation is he saying they should build. the only way they can build a nation is by taking over america which seems incredibly unlikely.

PALEFORCE 10-13-2012 05:24 PM

.

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 05:40 PM

restoring a nation is different from building a nation. not the same thing. i didnt watch the video but asking african americans 2 build a nations is absurd.

what do u mean by "niggerdom". i dont think black people are a hindrance lol.

EAGLE EYE 10-13-2012 05:44 PM

nation building is old news

terraforming mars is next

Shogah 10-13-2012 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang (Post 2271849)
didnt watch the video but sub sahara african and native american nations r extremely primitive and barbaric. look at sub sahara africa today. its full of dictators who use a very outdated and backwards political system.

if columbus never entered the americas most of those places wouldve been extremely primitive.

but u can also say if the romans didnt conquer the celts in britain or other europeans those lands would also b extremely primitive.

He would agree with you

http://img.filmlinks4u.net/2010/12/L...tch-Online.jpg

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob (Post 2271862)
nation building is old news

terraforming mars is next

if the ancient greek and roman empires didnt collapse we wouldve already been terraforming mars

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shogah (Post 2271867)

hed definitely disagree with me. i already talked about romans civilising britain and europe. most of the people around there would b nordic or in other words aryan. and they were also uncivilised and barbaric.

Shogah 10-13-2012 06:28 PM

If columbus never set foot on american soil there would still be native americans there.

Maybe it's stupid to look at it in that one dimensional way(but it is true nevertheless) but that's how you put things in perspective when you decide who is primitive and who is not, and that is why i am answering this way.

And some of the subsaharan africans had it just fine, untill democratic forces came in, to free them from their primitivism.

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 06:39 PM

was columbus a good person? no he wasnt. he allowed the rape of a woman.

but look at the native americans then. there was a huge number of them that didnt even clothe themselves. and most of these primitive societies are run by single leaders or dictators who prey on the weaker people and turn them into slaves. youd see this in most cultures.

columbus intervention definitely improved the general societies.

and no most of those subsaharan africans wouldnt have had it just fine. just look at the example of Meropius and his expedition team who entered Etihopia. the natives killed maority of that expedition team.

now think how violent and primitive that would be to kill expeditionists for no real reason. think how that society mustve been like. itd definitely be bad

rakimkoolgrapwutang 10-13-2012 06:41 PM

primitive doesnt mean violent it means primary, basic or relating to the earliest possible stage of a culture

TSA 10-13-2012 09:14 PM

nah dude this nigga is 100% right. Black people don't like hearing the truth so they run around flipping out on anyone that says it as if not hearing it makes it not exist. They only care about image management. Here and in africa. Everything can be in shambles but the main focus is how you look or how you're perceived.

Before you climb a mountain you have to first look up and realize how far from the top you are. All this bitch ass denial and SUNNY WINTERism isn't getting us anywhere.

The worst is running around saying your GawD, or that africa use to run the world. stfu, no it didn't and if it ever hopes to it won't do it on a foundation of lies.

TSA 10-13-2012 09:17 PM

I feel that for black people to fully come up they have to straight kill these white people. white people realized to come up they have to kill everyone else, so they did and when on top said 'oh those are thing people do in the past, game over elhZfe3LZ'. I don't feel it's realistic and wouldn't advocate it but it's a matter of priorities and if it's a priority someones got to die bruh.

RADIOACTIVE MAN 10-13-2012 10:14 PM

What an STD filled thread...from uncle toms to lynchers..this is an action packed thread


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright 2000 - 2013 The Wu-Tang Corp. & shift-one