sovreign/freeman of the land
anyone into it?? ( being self governed)
only following laws.. and not statutory acts..
accepting the capital letters on your birth cert. do not represent you as a human, but as fictitious person.. (corperation)
i been gettin into this heavily the last 2 years.. i've found out so much,, such as local councils are corperations, the united kingdom (plc) is a tradeing corperation.. that we consent to statutory laws, (by replyin to understand. as UNDERSTAND used by police is law definition)
that we sign up. to the corperations on our birth certs. ( check your birthday certificate's, they all say you have signed a contract with a corperation) and that your birth certificate is a copy.. so where is the original. ive tried to get mine...
im sure you have heard of lawful rebellion.
im gonna post some great clips. their pretty powerful. if u know your law(magna carta).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0IM7Hobd_k part 1 of 5// funny and informative
lawful rebellion in action..
http://www.youtube.com/user/Xodus2012#p/u/6/dd10kNepPog stopped by police...
http://www.youtube.com/user/Xodus2012#p/u/9/NC9_k9vbWFI same dude. after he got arresed under duress. his custody interview.. .. the sickest thing ive seen on youtube.....
video'd interview at home with a p.c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwWEK...eature=related
theirs lots more videos out their.. dealing with courts v freeman, clampers/debt collectors v freeman..
the sovreign/freeman lifestyle/concept applies in all western countrys.
no ones into law then? or wanting to be free?
people like following statutes? (which are not law?)
john harris - its an illusion
or the whole thing
Last edited by soul controller; 03-10-2011 at 10:19 AM.
Peace, do u practise it Fatal?
ive known about it a while, and used it with police when they do random stops, not giving my name/address/d.o.b., but recently ive had to use it in court :S for driving offences which come under the driver vehicle license act, had some fun with the judge, he didnt provide me with his oathe, but he did say he was working under it, then i asked, if he was acting under his oathe, why he was taking cash of a human being, for a private corporation (DVLA) and not for the queen/england, which he should only be doing going by his oathe, he just ignored me and asked me if i was sandeep singh matharu, to which i replied can i please see evidence you are qualified to be in the position you are in: the clerk said that all judges where under their oathe, and i replied i just want to see their oathe, under law, it is my right to see it, to which she replied, any grievances you may have, you can take up with the appeals court, at a later date. so they wanted me to agree to their terms and unlawful conditions,. i just stood my ground, the judge said if i didnt confirm if i was me, then i would be done for wasting court time, to which i replied, im here im willing to settle this matter, i just need some validation you are who you say you are,. to which he walked out.. i waited about 30 mins, the clerk came back in and said they would send me another date.. which they have,, 9th june :d leicester county court.. at 10 am.. lol if anyone wants to have some fun.. come join me
sovereignty is something that imo needs to be exercise.
i never really had to use it............
Saw a 60 Minutes piece on this. A sovereign father and son shot and killed 2 police officers during a routine traffic stop in West Memphis Arkansas (U.S.A.)
The piece made it seem like a bunch psuedo-educated rednecks and losers that did not want to pay their bills nor function rationally in society, and knew very basic ways on how to manipulate different laws.
They seem to be very big on their Constitutional right to bear arms
Interesting concept never-the-less
Last edited by june181972; 05-24-2011 at 10:18 PM.
most of the objections ive had from people on the sovreign human, is the same.. you dont want to pay fines/bills and its not fitting in with society..
to which i reply,. the bills(acts) are illegal and unjust, you have no contract with these govt corporations who collect cash from policeys
you do not manipulate laws, you just need to know the differance between law, and acts.. and using it to your advantage
its the same legal frame work their, based on the magna carta,. and on blacks law dictionary,. laws are laws.. legal framework(statutory acts) need and require consent, to be given the force of law..
i did get threats for contempt of court, and wasting court time, and was threatened by the judge to be arrested,. but you have to stand your ground and stick to the law.
theirs some GREAT 'freeman in court' videos on youtube,. this shit is real. everyone should get educated in it.
theirs also wicked sites www.tpuc.org
thanks fatal peace
i got 2 notices up on my door, they are as follows
NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS
12 March 2010
Notice to Agent is deemed Notice to Principal, Notice to Principal is deemed Notice to Agent.
I hereby give Notice that The Implied Right of Access to the Property known as *** ST QUENTIN STREET
PLECK, WALSALL, WS2 9JN has been removed in respect of the following:
* Any Employee, or Agent or Principal or any other PERSONS Acting on behalf of the CORPORATE COURTS,
LOCAL COUNCIL or PRIVATE CORPORATION,PUBLIC AGENCY,GOVERNMENT AGENCY
*Any Employee or Agent or Principal or any other PERSON Acting on behalf of Any BAILIFF COLLECTION AGENCY, and
*Any POLICE OFFICER who is Acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and not upholding the LAW for and on behalf
of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and Her People as expressed in the Oath of Office of All POLICE Men and Women.
*Please also Take Notice that the land known as England is a Common Law Jurisdiction and
ANY TRANSGRESSION OF THIS NOTICE WITHOUT Prewritten signed consent Sworn Under Oath in front of a
Notary will be dealt according to common law and may Result in a limitless fine, no less than £10,000 for the man,
woman and corporation separately.
*By knocking on the door or pushing the bell button you agree to the terms and conditions above.
of Sovereign Family Matharu
You have called here today in order to discuss a matter. I need to establish grounds for any discussion and to provide myself with the necessary security before disclosing any of my private details to you. Please complete and hand back this brief questionnaire. If you cannot provide all the information required, I will take the assumption that you are not who you say you are and will decline to speak with you on this occasion while reserving all my rights not to be bound by any contracts revealed or unrevealed.
1. What is your full name __________________________________________________ _________________
2. Are you here representing yourself or a company
3. What is the Name of the Company you represent
4. What is your address and the address of the company you represent. (include phone numbers)
5. Registration Number of your Vehicle __________________________________________________ ______
6. What is your job title in the company __________________________________________________ ______
7. Name of Person, or other, you wish to speak with ______________________________________________
8. Brief outline of reason for visit __________________________________________________ ___________
9. Do you have proof that I gave you authority over me. Yes / No (delete as appropriate)
(If yes, be ready to provide documented proof of contract and proof of authority over me, given by me.)
You will need to provide proof of a valid signed contract between you and I, should you wish to discuss any matter pertaining to Licenses, Debts, Fees, Charges, or any matter concerning a 3rd party.
Your signature: _________________________________ Date: ___________________
if they want to fuck about with legal bullshit., im applying the same conditions