Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: Blacks and Indians are losers when it comes to building a great nation.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Exclamation Blacks and Indians are losers when it comes to building a great nation.



    To state that African-Americans and Native Americans haven't built anything in history is down right a disgrace.

    Then he goes on to say that black men have no honor because we are unable to construct a nation while other races are able to construct nations. We're weak and our women are the main providers.

    Just listen to the video and you'll understand what I'm talking about.

  2. #2
    No artificial sleazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    46,469
    Rep Power
    10

    Default


    lol

  3. #3
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    didnt watch the video but sub sahara african and native american nations r extremely primitive and barbaric. look at sub sahara africa today. its full of dictators who use a very outdated and backwards political system.

    if columbus never entered the americas most of those places wouldve been extremely primitive.

    but u can also say if the romans didnt conquer the celts in britain or other europeans those lands would also b extremely primitive.

    im not exactly sure how african americans can build a nation if theyre slaves who entered into america. what kinda nation is he saying they should build. the only way they can build a nation is by taking over america which seems incredibly unlikely.


    NON-IGS

  4. #4

    Default

    .
    Last edited by PALEHORSE; 10-24-2012 at 05:09 AM.



    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones View Post
    Food For Thought, i don't even pay you any attention because i know you're a retard.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    didnt watch the video but sub sahara african and native american nations r extremely primitive and barbaric. look at sub sahara africa today. its full of dictators who use a very outdated and backwards political system.

    if columbus never entered the americas most of those places wouldve been extremely primitive.

    but u can also say if the romans didnt conquer the celts in britain or other europeans those lands would also b extremely primitive.
    He would agree with you


  6. #6
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shogah View Post
    He would agree with you

    hed definitely disagree with me. i already talked about romans civilising britain and europe. most of the people around there would b nordic or in other words aryan. and they were also uncivilised and barbaric.


    NON-IGS

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    hed definitely disagree with me. i already talked about romans civilising britain and europe. most of the people around there would b nordic or in other words aryan. and they were also uncivilised and barbaric.
    nordic and aryan are two different things

    nordic ethnic grouping was n reality what the germans austrians etc were

    aryan were basically persian/iranian and they are also in places like turkey and india



  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Demon View Post
    nordic and aryan are two different things

    nordic ethnic grouping was n reality what the germans austrians etc were

    aryan were basically persian/iranian and they are also in places like turkey and india
    .
    Last edited by PALEHORSE; 10-24-2012 at 08:51 AM.



    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones View Post
    Food For Thought, i don't even pay you any attention because i know you're a retard.

  9. #9
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Demon View Post
    nordic and aryan are two different things

    nordic ethnic grouping was n reality what the germans austrians etc were

    aryan were basically persian/iranian and they are also in places like turkey and india
    yes sorry i was commenting to that guy talking about hitler and so i used the word in the nazi sense (which is the wrong sense). i think the term "aryan" mightve been used by some slavs cuz they had the same language as iranians indians etc back then.

    but im not 2 sure about that.


    NON-IGS

  10. #10
    Old Head, Young Shoulders laolu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    London
    Age
    24
    Posts
    574
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    didnt watch the video but sub sahara african and native american nations r extremely primitive and barbaric. look at sub sahara africa today. its full of dictators who use a very outdated and backwards political system.

    if columbus never entered the americas most of those places wouldve been extremely primitive.

    but u can also say if the romans didnt conquer the celts in britain or other europeans those lands would also b extremely primitive.
    Idiot.

  11. #11
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by laolu View Post
    Idiot.
    its true. lol do u think native americans would b using computers if columbus never entered the americas.

    do u think britain wouldve been anywhere near as gr8 if the romans didnt invade it.

    am i praising columbus. no im not. he was an extremely cruel and brutal man. and he allowed the rape of a woman.

    but his presence definitely did advance the americas cuz he taught them far more advanced stuff.


    NON-IGS

  12. #12
    Old Head, Young Shoulders laolu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    London
    Age
    24
    Posts
    574
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    its true. lol do u think native americans would b using computers if columbus never entered the americas.

    do u think britain wouldve been anywhere near as gr8 if the romans didnt invade it.

    am i praising columbus. no im not. he was an extremely cruel and brutal man. and he allowed the rape of a woman.

    but his presence definitely did advance the americas cuz he taught them far more advanced stuff.
    You are an idiot.

  13. #13
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    restoring a nation is different from building a nation. not the same thing. i didnt watch the video but asking african americans 2 build a nations is absurd.

    what do u mean by "niggerdom". i dont think black people are a hindrance lol.


    NON-IGS

  14. #14
    No artificial sleazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    46,469
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    nation building is old news

    terraforming mars is next

  15. #15
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
    nation building is old news

    terraforming mars is next
    if the ancient greek and roman empires didnt collapse we wouldve already been terraforming mars


    NON-IGS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •