Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Supreme Mathmatics Vs. Empirical Math

  1. #1

    Default Supreme Mathmatics Vs. Empirical Math

    I don't mean to disrespect anyone with this question, that being known 1st, here it is.
    Why is SM different from EM?
    The differences are striking,

    The planet's circumferences are waaay different.

    The speed of sound is usually found as measured through water. This figure changes when drag is present, so it could be any number with the right amount of resistance factored in.

    Earth's Land Mass is off in SM by a paltry 418 Million Sq Km
    Earth's Water Mass is off by only 76 Million Sq Km

    Without getting too much deeper into converting and comparing measurement units, I'll only say that the differences are evident right upfront.

    So why aren't these numbers changed to reflect actual numbers?

    My theory is that this is impossible, due to the fact that in SM these numbers have a deeper meaning than I can gauge at a glance.

    When posting please do not state that these SM numbers are actual numbers. Don't say for example that a vast conspiracy is covering up for the validity of SM measurements Vs. scientific findings.

    I'll only tell you you're wrong.

    Being that we would be discussing science and philosophy, let's discuss it with respect to either sides personal investment in the matters.

  2. #2
    healthy merking LHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    well

    seeing as there is no precise way to measure a lot of this stuff

    maybe there isnt all that much to discuss




    also
    one of the main purposes of supreme math is to broaden the perspective of the person learning it

    so
    instead of having their mind on their block
    they think about their planet
    your mother's dick

  3. #3

    Default Reply

    Good answer.
    Except,
    there are very precise ways to measure this stuff.

  4. #4
    healthy merking LHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    when total land mass is changing every second

    i dont see how
    your mother's dick

  5. #5
    Illuminatis!
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Tallahassee,Florida
    Age
    26
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    all of that stuff if your talkin about 120 and the LNF (Lost Found Muslims Lessons from the NOI) all of that shit is metaphorical. They sayin one thing but mean somethin else.


    Can we please have a moment of peace?
    For every G that fell for his flag in the streets
    Bloodin' and thuggin', folkin' and locin'
    Crypin' and creepin', Latin and kingin'
    Or just for poor righteous teachin'

  6. #6

    Default

    Why do you use "empirical math" as absolute truth?

    What makes it more valid??

  7. #7
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Wilderness of North America
    Posts
    412
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Good question.


    The universe is full of knowledge. Everything in the universe is truth. There is nothing false that God created, and as long as you live, if you live to be 1,000, you could never exhaust the knowledge that is in this universe.

  8. #8

    Default Thanks!

    True, we live on a changing world.
    So, they use satellite imagery these days to see whats what.
    In the old days they had to rely on explorers and very basic surveyying equipment.
    I use Empirical Math as an absolute truth because that's what it is. It's an absolute.
    Empirical math and science don't deal with philosophy, so we have to fill in the blank.
    To say the very least about this, I'm interested. I'm interested to see what kind of philosophy drives people to make the astounding changes within themselves and outwards towards they're community, to make they're world make better sense.
    Not that I believe it myself, or really even could at this stage.
    Mine is simple, I think science is the only true thing. And science is only true in a very thin sense, only until it's debunked or added on to.
    But that's me, not you.
    Science never stopped a person from doing something horrendous, or having it done to them, philosophy, often has.
    It's interesting, to say the least.

  9. #9
    healthy merking LHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    science often ignores its own short-comings


    why does everybody know einstein
    but
    not heisenberg?
    your mother's dick

  10. #10

    Default Scientific Ciphers

    Rarely.
    Peer bashing in science is a lot like that present in Hip Hop.
    Scientists have to have approval for they're peers. When a peer can beat down another scientists findings, they always do.

  11. #11
    healthy merking LHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    yeah
    but
    the really good shit always stays under ground


    why would you defend such a ridiculous position?


    heisenbergs work blasts a hole in the western mind with an effect equalled only by a brain on drugs

    einsteins work blasts holes in the planet
    easily understandable by people with no insight
    Last edited by LHX; 03-08-2006 at 12:15 AM. Reason: retarded grammar
    your mother's dick

  12. #12

    Default Ummmmmmmmmmm I don't understand.

    What?

    The heisenberg principle is something like, you can't predict where an electron will end up once pushed by a force. Or you can't know what it's path had been during the trip from A to B.
    And Einstein's work, well it's a bit bigger.

    So the only holes I can imagine you talking about are the ones made by bombs built using these principles or maybe the black holes in space which these principles are used to observe and quantify.

    People without insight can indeed easily understand this stuff. That's where the beauty of the science is, it's simple on the surface, and hugely complex underneath. That's where they're comin from.

  13. #13

    Default

    Show and prove that supreme mathematics is not exercised through observation and scientific conclusions. In fact you would have to study such a field in order to dismiss it.

    philosophy is search of wisdom.
    The advancment of technology is an understanding of wisdom which creates a new idea or invention.
    For example.
    A fool(opposed to being wise) cannot build a satelite.

    But a fool will misuse it according to a universal truth which creates an objective for a common cause.....looking at me.

    This is really a debate between natural mind and technology.

    Some have the ability to manipulate technological invettions with powerful thought, infact with supereme mathematics some are studying this and will advance.

    Ra nefer amen made a note of how western thought builds things while eastern thought builds people.


    Then this becomes of debate between Black science and white sceince.


    Philosophy was needed to create technology.


    Empiracal math is and attribute of supreme math.......


    study.

    PEACE

  14. #14
    healthy merking LHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,792
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlightlySlightedFan
    What?

    The heisenberg principle is something like, you can't predict where an electron will end up once pushed by a force. Or you can't know what it's path had been during the trip from A to B.
    And Einstein's work, well it's a bit bigger.

    So the only holes I can imagine you talking about are the ones made by bombs built using these principles or maybe the black holes in space which these principles are used to observe and quantify.

    People without insight can indeed easily understand this stuff. That's where the beauty of the science is, it's simple on the surface, and hugely complex underneath. That's where they're comin from.
    classic example of what i am talking about

    everybody knows einstein
    nobody knows heisenberg

    there is a reason



    if they taught the principle of uncertainty and explored all the implications of it in high school

    90% of the students would drop out and move to southern asia or northern africa



    (not good for america inc)
    your mother's dick

  15. #15

    Default It just so happens

    That I learned the uncertainty principle in high school.
    And please don't say,
    that I went to a good high school.
    Because I didn't.
    My school was for people who were kicked out of real high schools.
    I just had,
    an extremely good physics teacher.

    What I didn't learn in high school.
    What I guess I always knew.
    Was that something like god,
    Is simply too complex to express in simple mathmatic terms.
    And that all that people can ever learn of god.
    Is another person's interpretation of such.
    Which doesn't scratch the surface.
    Therefore.
    I think.
    It is you that should study.
    Things like repeating patterns and sequences.
    Fibonacci.
    That exist everywhere around you.
    Stephen Hawking maybe.
    Maybe Newton, who you will find.
    Was brilliant.
    But what nobody knew until recently was,
    that Newton spent his life chasing down god.
    And found nothing.
    It's not for us to know.
    As far as black and white science.
    It's not an issue.
    Not with science.
    Science is impersonal.
    And universal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •