"The actions of those Arabs/Mongols effected the people of those times, whereas the actions of the whiteman effect us still now."
Because that still is still very recent. The Mongol invasion has everlasting effects. They destroyed Baghdad, one of the most beautiful cities in theworld at the time, and it did not recover until Saddam Hussein...I'd say that a long term effect. The nation of Turkey is a result of Turco-Mongol invasions and Islamic expansion into former Byzantine Christian lands.....There are not more Byzantine Christians there....Long term CULTURAL effect.
"Arabs did invade parts of Europe, but they did not destroy your language, enslave you, robb u of your culture, and put an effect on you that lasts hundreds of years. They simply ransacked your country and ruled it. Big difference!
LOL are you serious with this statement? The Spanish fought them out of their homeland and took it back during the Reconquista...Islamic expansion thruout all of North and West Africa and the Middle East was done by violence. There hands are no cleaner than a Christian's.
"And even though some peeps from "the East" maybe considered Caucasian, when I say the white man I am only talking of those of European descent."
If you start lumping Europe together as all one people, you obviously have not done your history on the continent. Thats like saying North Africans and sub saharan africans are one culture cuz they share a continent. Its not. And Asia is even more diverse.
YOu aren't saying anything really. Just blaming the Europeans for everything. Its a common theme on this board, anti-european racism. Be happy you werent born 100 years ago. If you were born 2000 or so years ago, maybe you would have been somewhere in West Africa, or whatever sub saharan african country you were sold from.
"U say I don't know how to deal with the humiliation of being under the white man's foot? The future will be revealed."
Of course it will, time knows no pauses.