"I love their music, but they're still some low life ghetto uneducated scumbags"
Isn't this statement somewhat oxymoronic? I mean, you "love" their music but they are "low life ghetto uneducated scumbags". So, what does that make you? To love someone's music, art,... means you can either relate to his/her lyrics or music.
I am offended because i don't consider myself a low life ghetto uneducated scumbag, for i'd have to be if i love the wu. get it.
Uneducated. how do u define education? going to college? son, look up John Taylor Gato, and see what he, as an experienced and respectable educator in the NYC school system had to say about education. what u learn at Harvard, can't be learned for a few cents at your local library. the great Frederick Douglass never went to college. in fact he never went to school. he virtually taught himself.
think about it. what do u really learn in school besides reading and writing. well a lot: like how to fit in perfectly into a capitalist economic system. you know: the customer's always right, obey your superior....
what these corrupted and well "educated" corporate execs are doin to workin people is "low life". they are scumbags for wastin away workin class people's 401k's. i bet you don't see it that. after all they went to Harvard, Yale, Oxford....
to come form the ghetto, to producing movie scores, making music that people like you can enjoy, doin tv shows, creatin clothing lines, owning businesses, being praised by business experts (Time Magazine) and so on is worth a positive nod. don't you think?
one last thing. is Wu-tang overated? well, possibly. You need to look up the word "FANATIC", for that's what we are. and, as you should know, fans (short for fanatic) can get carried away