once upon a time in shaolin - buy the book now!
Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 107

Thread: christianity 551 years old?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Heisman Mic Tyson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    East Columbus/Los Angeles
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,223
    Rep Power
    20

    Default christianity 551 years old?

    so i was readin the NOI student enrollment 1-10 and came across

    10. What is the birth record of said nations, others than Islam?

    ANSWER

    10. Buddhism is 35,000 years old.

    Christianity is 551 years old.
    There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger.



    i was just wondering where the idea christianity is only 551 years old came from, because it is older than that

  2. #2
    G.A.W.D. PT.III RzaRectum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    10304
    Posts
    3,266
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Sounds like lies designed to undermine the christian faith
    Quote Originally Posted by food for thought View Post
    i hope you die tonight faggit.

  3. #3
    Anglophile Dooch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Big Plum
    Posts
    23,863
    Rep Power
    68

    Default

    People actually take NOI seriously???

    Christianity is older than Islam. Not that that means anything. But its funny. We've been around for thousands of years and all of a sudden some Arabian dude calls himself a prophet and starts a 'religious' movement based upon conquering the mid east, north africa and parts of Europe.
    Christianity is the same. It was a tool used to consolidate power in Europe and abroad.
    Look eye, always look eye.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickyTooch View Post
    People actually take NOI seriously???

    Christianity is older than Islam. Not that that means anything. But its funny. We've been around for thousands of years and all of a sudden some Arabian dude calls himself a prophet and starts a 'religious' movement based upon conquering the mid east, north africa and parts of Europe.
    Christianity is the same. It was a tool used to consolidate power in Europe and abroad.
    The 85% take things on face value.

    Christianity is not older than Islam.

    Islam did not start with the person known as Prophet Muhammad.

    There was no middle east during the time of muhammad of about 1600 years ago.

    The details matter.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post
    The 85% take things on face value.

    Christianity is not older than Islam.

    Islam did not start with the person known as Prophet Muhammad.

    There was no middle east during the time of muhammad of about 1600 years ago.

    The details matter.
    where's the proof?

    you can say any thing's true without proof, but with proof it's likely everyone will believe you and support your cause.

  6. #6
    I AM HIPHOP
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam, NL
    Posts
    4,482
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    oh come on ... don't take NOI as if it was knowledge or something
    http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=55138
    http://www.wutang-corp.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54919
    Quote Originally Posted by Tectrus Moa View Post
    I'm not going post more pictures of my dick, Style. You guys can forget about it!
    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesJones View Post
    Some of ya'll that are having sex without condoms need to be careful because that shit ain't cool having sex with no condoms.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mic Tyson View Post
    so i was readin the NOI student enrollment 1-10 and came across

    10. What is the birth record of said nations, others than Islam?

    ANSWER

    10. Buddhism is 35,000 years old.

    Christianity is 551 years old.
    There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger.



    i was just wondering where the idea christianity is only 551 years old came from, because it is older than that
    A person can have lessons.......and with those lessons they have, they'll never see any parts of understanding without proper guidance.

  8. #8
    Heisman Mic Tyson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    East Columbus/Los Angeles
    Age
    27
    Posts
    3,223
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post
    A person can have lessons.......and with those lessons they have, they'll never see any parts of understanding without proper guidance.
    i get what u sayin i don't have guidance with the lessons. thats why i asked about

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mic Tyson View Post
    i get what u sayin i don't have guidance with the lessons. thats why i asked about
    Peace.

    That's good that you realize that. People think having the lessons will bring them into the knowledge of self and the sciences of everything in life, however that isn't the case.

    As far as your question, research John Wycliff and that will give you some insight into that particular degree you're dealing with.

    How are you going to know and understand 10, when you don't know and understand 1?

    Who is the Original Man?

    The 85% knows that it rain hail snow and also hear thunder above their heads but do not try to learn who is causing all this to happen by letting the 5% teach them. They believe in the 10% on face value.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mic Tyson View Post
    yeah i get what u sayin black man but u should have said it your first post and things would have been less confusin. i should have read the student enrollment more clearly though
    I SHOULD HAVE SAID WHAT? ASK ALL OF THOSE QUESTIONS FOR YOU? YOU ASKED YOUR QUESTION, AND I GAVE YOU THE RIGHT GUIDANCE FOR YOU TO FIND YOUR ANSWER. THEN YOU WANT TO MAKE ME RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ERROR? WHAT THE PUCK?

    Quote Originally Posted by STYLE View Post
    i get where he's coming from.
    blackman just needs to be frank like that last post and lose the cryptic speech.

    I NEED TO BE FRANK? I'M COOL BEING BLACKMAN. MY LAST POST WAS A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS. THERE'S NOTHING 'FRANK' ABOUT THAT? I DIDN'T START THIS THREAD, MIC TYSON DID, AND HE STARTED IT WITH A QUESTION. HIS QUESTION WAS BASICALLY ANSWERED. NOTHING CRYPTIC ABOUT "STUDY JOHN WYCLIFF" FOR YOUR ANSWER. VERY 'FRANK' AND TO THE POINT. OF ALL THE THINGS THAT I SAID I ASKED ABOUT TEN QUESTIONS AND MADE AROUND THREE STATEMENTS. I SEE NOW, I'M SUPPOSSED TO DO ALL THE WORK FOR YOU RIGHT? I ANSWER DUDES QUESTION FRANKLY AND TO THE POINT.

    "you are asking two questions here. let me try to explain...." was all that was needed.

    DUDE, I ANSWER THE FIRST QUESTION AND HIS SECOND QUESTION I STATED I'M NOT IN THE NOI. THE SECOND QUESTION CAME AFTER I ANSWERED THE FIRST QUESTION. PAY ATTENTION TO HOW THIS THREAD UNFOLDED. THE POST ARE STILL THERE, GO BACK AND READ THE ORDER OF THINGS.

    its like you see the discussion derailing but rather than put it on track you'd rather watch the train wreck.

    THIS COMING FROM MR. INSULT MAN. A QUESTION WAS ASKED, I KNOW THE ANSWER, I PROVIDED AN ANSWER. I'M NOT THE ONE WHO WAS DIS-SATSIFIED WITH THE ANSWER THAT WAS GIVEN AND THE GUIDANCE THAT WAS GIVEN. IF THE THREAD WAS DERAILED IT'S BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO FOLLOW ORDER. I'M SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE SAYING, "YOU CAN LEAD A HORSE TO WATER BUT YOU CAN'T MAKE IT DRINK" THE SAME APPLIES TO A SO-CALLED DERAILED THREAD.

    I'M NOT THE AUTHOR OF THE THREAD, IT'S HIS RESPONSIBILITY AS THE AUTHOR TO TAKE CARE OF WHATEVER.

    communication+clarity=understanding

    TELL IT TO THE AUTHOR OF THE THREAD. I COMMUNICATED VERY CLEARLY. STUDY JOHN WYCLIFF. DON'T GET MUCH CLEARER THAN THAT. DIS-SATISFIED PEOPLE.

    christianity as a nation....
    Emperor Theodosius and the holy roman empire.

    OK, AND YOU SAY THIS BECAUSE?

    okay now i will ask you a question...
    why doesn't noi recognize the HRE as the birthplace of the christian nation?

    I'M NOT IN THE NOI SO I DON'T SPEAK FOR THEM. DEPENDING ON WHO YOU TALK TO IN THE NOI WILL DETERMINE THE ANSWER YOU GET. FARRAKHAN MAY RECOGNIZE THE ABOVE AS THE BIRTHPLACE OF THE CHRISTIAN NATION. HE STILL MAY NOT GIVE THAT ANSWER, HE MAY GIVE YOU HIS UNDERSTANDING OF (WHAT IS THE BIRTH RECORD OF SAID NATIONS OTHER THAN ISLAM?) AND NOT WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR. OTHERS MAY SAY WHAT YOU HAVE SAID IN THE ABOVE. IS ONE MORE RIGHT THAN THE OTHER? I DON'T TAKE MY LESSONS ON FACE VALUE, I HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF IT. EVERYBODY IN THE NOI DON'T UNDERSTAND THEIR LESSONS.

    THE QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED PERTAINING TO THE CHRISIANITY (1-10) WAS MISUNDERSTOOD.

    OBSERVE ALL THE REPLIES.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mic Tyson View Post
    so i was readin the NOI student enrollment 1-10 and came across

    10. What is the birth record of said nations, others than Islam?

    ANSWER

    10. Buddhism is 35,000 years old.

    Christianity is 551 years old.
    There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger.



    i was just wondering where the idea christianity is only 551 years old came from, because it is older than that
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post
    A person can have lessons.......and with those lessons they have, they'll never see any parts of understanding without proper guidance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mic Tyson View Post
    i get what u sayin i don't have guidance with the lessons. thats why i asked about
    THIS POST BELOW IS MY FIRST POST ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION. AS I HAVE SAID NUMEROUS OF TIMES, UNDERSTANDING COMES IN TIME. THERE IS NOTHING CONFUSING OR MISLEADING ABOUT MY ANSWER. I CLEARLY STATE WHO TO STUDY. WHAT ABOUT MY ANSWER WAS CONFUSING? IF YOU ARE CONFUSED IT IS YOUR OWN FAULT, I DID NOT CONFUSE YOU YOU CONFUSED YOURSELF.

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post
    Peace.

    That's good that you realize that. People think having the lessons will bring them into the knowledge of self and the sciences of everything in life, however that isn't the case.

    As far as your question, research John Wycliff and that will give you some insight into that particular degree you're dealing with.

    How are you going to know and understand 10, when you don't know and understand 1?

    Who is the Original Man?

    The 85% knows that it rain hail snow and also hear thunder above their heads but do not try to learn who is causing all this to happen by letting the 5% teach them. They believe in the 10% on face value.
    Peace.

  11. #11
    STYLE
    Guest

    Default

    this is why you lose.

    you give the nation a bad name. humble yourself instead of using the lessons as a lever to elevate your ego.





  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by STYLE View Post
    this is why you lose.

    you give the nation a bad name. humble yourself instead of using the lessons as a lever to elevate your ego.

  13. #13
    STYLE
    Guest

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by Black Man View Post


    very funny indeed. but he asked you a question in an effort to gain understanding and you shit on him. 5% educate the 85%? right?

    you see the reaction that got you.

    then you decided to try to come correct. and you see what that got you.

    my point is that being 5% does not require you being an asshole. that is a personal choice. don't use the nation as a front to do so.

    peace.



  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by STYLE View Post
    very funny indeed. but he asked you a question in an effort to gain understanding and you shit on him. 5% educate the 85%? right?

    you see the reaction that got you.

    then you decided to try to come correct. and you see what that got you.

    my point is that being 5% does not require you being an asshole. that is a personal choice. don't use the nation as a front to do so.

    peace.

  15. #15
    Semi Retired Prolifical ENG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    34
    Posts
    9,643
    Rep Power
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by memoryman View Post
    all three of the abrahamic faiths claim to inherit the same ancient prophetic tradition, so in a way all three can claim the same antiquity.
    someone Vaticanize that man



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •