Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 153

Thread: Church Vs. God.

  1. #16
    FRESH FISH
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    30
    Posts
    163
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Church Vs. God.

    If there was a god" you sure as hell wouldnt have to all gather in a little biulding talking about how shit everyone else's life is and how the devil is in all of them

  2. #17
    The Smell of The Future LORD NOSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Double Barreled Snot Gun
    Age
    4
    Posts
    15,094
    Rep Power
    75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khristo View Post
    If there was a god" you sure as hell wouldnt have to all gather in a little biulding talking about how shit everyone else's life is and how the devil is in all of them

    if you don't believe in what i believe in, you're going to hell to have your flesh burned off forever and ever - i feel sorry for anyone who doesn't believe - disbelievers are to be used for hard labor

  3. #18
    BIG OPINION, BIGGER LOAD TSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    LITville, USA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    37,585
    Rep Power
    144

    Default

    Did they even start the show?

  4. #19
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    christianity wasnt the same after jesus died.

    jesus' disciples were a bunch of retarded dickheads who didnt understand jesus so jesus' message was immediately fucked when he died.


    NON-IGS

  5. #20
    ISRAELITE THE W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Christ
    Posts
    15,482
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    christianity wasnt the same after jesus died.

    jesus' disciples were a bunch of retarded dickheads who didnt understand jesus so jesus' message was immediately fucked when he died.
    they did a good job of getting the word out.
    The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20)

  6. #21
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by THE W View Post
    they did a good job of changing the word of jesus and getting their version of the word out.
    fixed


    NON-IGS

  7. #22
    ISRAELITE THE W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Christ
    Posts
    15,482
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    fixed
    broken

    seeing as the original disciples had first hand accounts of what happened during jesus' ministry being that they were with him during that time and didnt give us the english translation we have today they cant really be blamed for what happened.

    you would have to look at the people who translated the books to english.
    The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20)

  8. #23
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by THE W View Post
    broken

    seeing as the original disciples had first hand accounts of what happened during jesus' ministry being that they were with him during that time and didnt give us the english translation we have today they cant really be blamed for what happened.

    you would have to look at the people who translated the books to english.
    seeing as they couldnt understand simple parables and they were complete idiots do u really trust them.

    paul was the worst he didnt have a clue about jesus and turned jesus' gospel of love into a gospel of redemption salvation and atonement.

    jesus never said why he died on the cross. paul and the 12 idiots were the first ones to say that he died to redeem them.

    from reading the letters of paul and comparing it to the christian gospels i came to the conclusion that jesus and paul were very different people with very different attitudes.

    and that reading paul is unhealthy.


    NON-IGS

  9. #24
    ISRAELITE THE W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Christ
    Posts
    15,482
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    jesus' references to salvation and eternal life are numerous in the gospels.

    have you read the book of acts? 1 corinthians 13?
    The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20)

  10. #25
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    jesus never once said he died on the cross to save people from their sins.

    paul and the disciples came to that conclusion not jesus.

    pauls message was a sadomasochistic one about how the most innocent pure man had to be brutally and savagely murdered for the sins of everybody else.

    this is stupid for numerous reasons:

    1) god is omnipotent and can therefore forgive or destroy sins with the snap of his fingers.

    2) it is an extremely preverse form of judgement. punishing the innocent for the guilty. imagine if courts were run like that lol.

    3) its very unlikely that a tender spirit like jesus would condone this type of thing.

    jesus actually dealt with sin in a much more realistic manner. he dealt with it by simply forgiving it and also he didnt judge people. good and evil come from judgement. therefore because he didnt judge or differentiate, he didnt see sin in people. everyone became equal including God. there was no sin.

    read "the idiot" by Dostoyevsky. it paints a much better image of jesus.

    1 cor 13 showed that paul had very little understanding of love.


    NON-IGS

  11. #26
    ...born of a future war Face of the Golden Falcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Within the ALL...
    Age
    33
    Posts
    758
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    jesus never once said he died on the cross to save people from their sins.

    paul and the disciples came to that conclusion not jesus.

    pauls message was a sadomasochistic one about how the most innocent pure man had to be brutally and savagely murdered for the sins of everybody else.

    this is stupid for numerous reasons:

    1) god is omnipotent and can therefore forgive or destroy sins with the snap of his fingers.

    2) it is an extremely preverse form of judgement. punishing the innocent for the guilty. imagine if courts were run like that lol.

    3) its very unlikely that a tender spirit like jesus would condone this type of thing.

    jesus actually dealt with sin in a much more realistic manner. he dealt with it by simply forgiving it and also he didnt judge people. good and evil come from judgement. therefore because he didnt judge or differentiate, he didnt see sin in people. everyone became equal including God. there was no sin.

    read "the idiot" by Dostoyevsky. it paints a much better image of jesus.

    1 cor 13 showed that paul had very little understanding of love.
    Great post. With the exception of the highlighted which flat out just isn't true. You're trying make Yashu'a out to be a moral relativist as well? Bible scripture in no way supports that.

    Req Em Ab



  12. #27
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Face of the Golden Falcon View Post
    Great post. With the exception of the highlighted which flat out just isn't true. You're trying make Yashu'a out to be a moral relativist as well? Bible scripture in no way supports that.
    i know it doesnt but i think jesus was such a loving forgiving person that he couldnt possibly bring himself to see the evil in others. it would upset him too much. he basicly tried to see the best in everybody.

    i dont think jesus made a teaching that sin was destroyed in this way but it was just his natural behaviour.


    NON-IGS

  13. #28
    ISRAELITE THE W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in Christ
    Posts
    15,482
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakimkoolgrapwutang View Post
    jesus never once said he died on the cross to save people from their sins.

    paul and the disciples came to that conclusion not jesus.

    pauls message was a sadomasochistic one about how the most innocent pure man had to be brutally and savagely murdered for the sins of everybody else.

    this is stupid for numerous reasons:

    1) god is omnipotent and can therefore forgive or destroy sins with the snap of his fingers.

    2) it is an extremely preverse form of judgement. punishing the innocent for the guilty. imagine if courts were run like that lol.

    3) its very unlikely that a tender spirit like jesus would condone this type of thing.

    jesus actually dealt with sin in a much more realistic manner. he dealt with it by simply forgiving it and also he didnt judge people. good and evil come from judgement. therefore because he didnt judge or differentiate, he didnt see sin in people. everyone became equal including God. there was no sin.

    read "the idiot" by Dostoyevsky. it paints a much better image of jesus.

    1 cor 13 showed that paul had very little understanding of love.


    since this is all based on your own personal world view what you have to say is pretty much irrelevant in regards to God's decree for his own creation testified to in scripture.

    the bible has no interest in satisfying yours, mine, or anyone elses world view. thats not the bible's intent at all. the bible testifies of God the creator's sovereign decree. you can reject the decree if you wish, but you cannot change it.

    as far as jesus' death not being about the salvation of sinners, its pretty much the same as those people who say the bible does not teach the trinity solely because the word "trinity" is not in scripture(and it isnt) despite contextual references being all over the new testament. you look for literal references and totally ignore numerous contextual references.

    so in mark 2:17 when jesus says "i have not come to call the rightous, but sinners, what is he calling them to? is it not salvation?

    in matthew 11:4-6 when jesus says "...the good news is preached to the poor". what good news do you think he is refering to? is it not the sins of the world being forgiven through christs sacrifice?

    luke 19:9-10?

    matthew 24:9-14? what do you take the "gospel of the kingdom" to mean?

    mark 8:31-38
    this is a good one as it speaks directly to your point. you're peter in this passage getting rebuked by jesus because what jesus is proposing and what God has decreed doesnt fit your personal world view.

    john 3?

    john 4:1-26? john 4:31-38? hell the whole book of john is crawling with quotes from jesus referencing salvation through his death. i dont see how you can miss it.

    luke 22:19-20...what is this new covenant? why is it in his blood? why does re predict his death in other verses?


    im gonna go out on a limb and say without ever reading the book that "the idiot" will also be based on someone elses personal world view and not the decree in which God's own word testifies thus making it a FALSE image of jesus.
    Last edited by THE W; 11-19-2012 at 01:54 PM.
    The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20)

  14. #29
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by THE W View Post
    since this is all based on your own personal world view what you have to say is pretty much irrelevant in regards to God's decree for his own creation testified to in scripture.

    the bible has no interest in satisfying yours, mine, or anyone elses world view. thats not the bible's intent at all. the bible testifies of God the creator's sovereign decree. you can reject the decree if you wish, but you cannot change it.

    as far as jesus' death not being about the salvation of sinners, its pretty much the same as those people who say the bible does not teach the trinity solely because the word "trinity" is not in scripture(and it isnt) despite contextual references being all over the new testament. you look for literal references and totally ignore numerous contextual references.

    so in mark 2:17 when jesus says "i have not come to call the rightous, but sinners, what is he calling them to? is it not salvation?

    its definitely not the salvation of jesus dying on a cross. hes calling them to the kingdom of god

    in matthew 11:4-6 when jesus says "...the good news is preached to the poor". what good news do you think he is refering to? is it not the sins of the world being forgiven through christs sacrifice?

    why through christs sacrifice. why not just forgiven.

    luke 19-10? no mention of sacrifice

    matthew 24-14? what do you take the "gospel of the kingdom" to mean?

    a state of pure unconditional love

    mark 8:31-38
    this is a good one as it speaks directly to your point. you're peter in this passage getting rebuked by jesus because what jesus is proposing and what God has decreed doesnt fit your personal world view.

    he says he has to die in order to fulfill a prophecy. he doesnt say he has to die to take away peoples sins

    john 3? no mention of dying to destroy sin. and hes talking about spiritual rebirth.

    john 4:1-26? john 4:31-38? hell the whole book of john is crawling with quotes from jesus referencing salvation through his death. i dont see how you can miss it.

    he doesnt even mention death here

    luke 22:19-20...what is this new covenant? why is it in his blood? why does re predict his death in other verses?

    he predicts his death because of prophecies. interestingly some manuscripts dont have given for u or poured out for you. why do u think that is? the new covenant is that the law is destroyed. thats interesting because law is based on judgement and relates to my earlier point that jesus didnt see sin in people because he didnt judge or differentiate. and so all people become equal no matter what they do because jesus has got rid of a system of good and bad (the law). not sure why its in his blood. but why does he have to die to destroy sin. could he not die in order to show people how to be free from revenge or that they dont need to fear death.

    im gonna go out on a limb and say without ever reading the book that "the idiot" will also be based on someone elses personal world view and not the decree in which God's own word testifies thus making it a FALSE image of jesus.
    that books a classic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Idiot

    jesus had already saved people from sin. he already got rid of the notion of guilt. jesus was lawless and didnt obey the law thus guilt no longer continued.

    plus you seem to be too trusting of these disciples.

    do you think they never lied. are you even sure that it was jesus disciples who wrote them.

    plus look at the huge difference between how jesus taught and paul taught. paul is often filled with malice .

    why is the image painted by paul the correct one.


    NON-IGS

  15. #30
    Non Ignorant Math Team
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,884
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    why does jesus have to die to redeem mankind. is it not more likely that hes showing mankind how to live.

    in other words "to turn the other cheek"


    NON-IGS

Similar Threads

  1. new mobb deep album titled infamous big bang!
    By jaywoods27 in forum Hip-Hop Shop
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 07-13-2005, 10:01 AM
  2. Az A.w.o.l.
    By tragedykhadafi12 in forum Hip-Hop Shop
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-30-2005, 09:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •