0
 

home
news
wu-tang clan
bio's
media
store
blogs
forum
contact

Go Back   Wu-Tang Corp. - Official Site of the Wu-Tang Clan > The Elements > Know The Ledge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2006, 03:58 PM   #1
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default Supreme Mathmatics Vs. Empirical Math

I don't mean to disrespect anyone with this question, that being known 1st, here it is.
Why is SM different from EM?
The differences are striking,

The planet's circumferences are waaay different.

The speed of sound is usually found as measured through water. This figure changes when drag is present, so it could be any number with the right amount of resistance factored in.

Earth's Land Mass is off in SM by a paltry 418 Million Sq Km
Earth's Water Mass is off by only 76 Million Sq Km

Without getting too much deeper into converting and comparing measurement units, I'll only say that the differences are evident right upfront.

So why aren't these numbers changed to reflect actual numbers?

My theory is that this is impossible, due to the fact that in SM these numbers have a deeper meaning than I can gauge at a glance.

When posting please do not state that these SM numbers are actual numbers. Don't say for example that a vast conspiracy is covering up for the validity of SM measurements Vs. scientific findings.

I'll only tell you you're wrong.

Being that we would be discussing science and philosophy, let's discuss it with respect to either sides personal investment in the matters.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 05:01 PM   #2
LHX
healthy merking
 
LHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 35
Posts: 5,936
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 22
LHX drunken mastaLHX drunken masta
Send a message via MSN to LHX
Default

well

seeing as there is no precise way to measure a lot of this stuff

maybe there isnt all that much to discuss




also
one of the main purposes of supreme math is to broaden the perspective of the person learning it

so
instead of having their mind on their block
they think about their planet
__________________
your mother's dick
LHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2006, 06:24 AM   #3
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default Reply

Good answer.
Except,
there are very precise ways to measure this stuff.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2006, 07:23 AM   #4
LHX
healthy merking
 
LHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 35
Posts: 5,936
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 22
LHX drunken mastaLHX drunken masta
Send a message via MSN to LHX
Default

when total land mass is changing every second

i dont see how
__________________
your mother's dick
LHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2006, 12:30 PM   #5
DigitalScience
Illuminatis!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tallahassee,Florida
Age: 24
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 0
DigitalScience grasshopper
Send a message via AIM to DigitalScience Send a message via MSN to DigitalScience Send a message via Yahoo to DigitalScience
Default

all of that stuff if your talkin about 120 and the LNF (Lost Found Muslims Lessons from the NOI) all of that shit is metaphorical. They sayin one thing but mean somethin else.
__________________


Can we please have a moment of peace?
For every G that fell for his flag in the streets
Bloodin' and thuggin', folkin' and locin'
Crypin' and creepin', Latin and kingin'
Or just for poor righteous teachin'
DigitalScience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2006, 02:52 PM   #6
Aqueous Moon
Veteran Member
 
Aqueous Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,617
Rep Power: 14
Aqueous Moon grasshopper
Default

Why do you use "empirical math" as absolute truth?

What makes it more valid??
Aqueous Moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 07:04 AM   #7
Wamukota X
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Wilderness of North America
Posts: 412
Rep Power: 9
Wamukota X shaolin monk
Default

Good question.
__________________


The universe is full of knowledge. Everything in the universe is truth. There is nothing false that God created, and as long as you live, if you live to be 1,000, you could never exhaust the knowledge that is in this universe.
Wamukota X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:04 AM   #8
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default Thanks!

True, we live on a changing world.
So, they use satellite imagery these days to see whats what.
In the old days they had to rely on explorers and very basic surveyying equipment.
I use Empirical Math as an absolute truth because that's what it is. It's an absolute.
Empirical math and science don't deal with philosophy, so we have to fill in the blank.
To say the very least about this, I'm interested. I'm interested to see what kind of philosophy drives people to make the astounding changes within themselves and outwards towards they're community, to make they're world make better sense.
Not that I believe it myself, or really even could at this stage.
Mine is simple, I think science is the only true thing. And science is only true in a very thin sense, only until it's debunked or added on to.
But that's me, not you.
Science never stopped a person from doing something horrendous, or having it done to them, philosophy, often has.
It's interesting, to say the least.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 10:44 AM   #9
LHX
healthy merking
 
LHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 35
Posts: 5,936
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 22
LHX drunken mastaLHX drunken masta
Send a message via MSN to LHX
Default

science often ignores its own short-comings


why does everybody know einstein
but
not heisenberg?
__________________
your mother's dick
LHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 11:11 AM   #10
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default Scientific Ciphers

Rarely.
Peer bashing in science is a lot like that present in Hip Hop.
Scientists have to have approval for they're peers. When a peer can beat down another scientists findings, they always do.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 11:30 AM   #11
LHX
healthy merking
 
LHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 35
Posts: 5,936
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 22
LHX drunken mastaLHX drunken masta
Send a message via MSN to LHX
Default

yeah
but
the really good shit always stays under ground


why would you defend such a ridiculous position?


heisenbergs work blasts a hole in the western mind with an effect equalled only by a brain on drugs

einsteins work blasts holes in the planet
easily understandable by people with no insight
__________________
your mother's dick

Last edited by LHX; 03-08-2006 at 12:15 AM. Reason: retarded grammar
LHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 09:00 AM   #12
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default Ummmmmmmmmmm I don't understand.

What?

The heisenberg principle is something like, you can't predict where an electron will end up once pushed by a force. Or you can't know what it's path had been during the trip from A to B.
And Einstein's work, well it's a bit bigger.

So the only holes I can imagine you talking about are the ones made by bombs built using these principles or maybe the black holes in space which these principles are used to observe and quantify.

People without insight can indeed easily understand this stuff. That's where the beauty of the science is, it's simple on the surface, and hugely complex underneath. That's where they're comin from.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 10:03 AM   #13
Decipha Born
Junior Member
 
Decipha Born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC the BIg APPLE
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 0
Decipha Born grasshopper
Default

Show and prove that supreme mathematics is not exercised through observation and scientific conclusions. In fact you would have to study such a field in order to dismiss it.

philosophy is search of wisdom.
The advancment of technology is an understanding of wisdom which creates a new idea or invention.
For example.
A fool(opposed to being wise) cannot build a satelite.

But a fool will misuse it according to a universal truth which creates an objective for a common cause.....looking at me.

This is really a debate between natural mind and technology.

Some have the ability to manipulate technological invettions with powerful thought, infact with supereme mathematics some are studying this and will advance.

Ra nefer amen made a note of how western thought builds things while eastern thought builds people.


Then this becomes of debate between Black science and white sceince.


Philosophy was needed to create technology.


Empiracal math is and attribute of supreme math.......


study.

PEACE
__________________
Decipha Born is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 10:35 AM   #14
LHX
healthy merking
 
LHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 35
Posts: 5,936
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 22
LHX drunken mastaLHX drunken masta
Send a message via MSN to LHX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlightlySlightedFan
What?

The heisenberg principle is something like, you can't predict where an electron will end up once pushed by a force. Or you can't know what it's path had been during the trip from A to B.
And Einstein's work, well it's a bit bigger.

So the only holes I can imagine you talking about are the ones made by bombs built using these principles or maybe the black holes in space which these principles are used to observe and quantify.

People without insight can indeed easily understand this stuff. That's where the beauty of the science is, it's simple on the surface, and hugely complex underneath. That's where they're comin from.
classic example of what i am talking about

everybody knows einstein
nobody knows heisenberg

there is a reason



if they taught the principle of uncertainty and explored all the implications of it in high school

90% of the students would drop out and move to southern asia or northern africa



(not good for america inc)
__________________
your mother's dick
LHX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2006, 03:14 PM   #15
SlightlySlightedFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 0
SlightlySlightedFan grasshopper
Default It just so happens

That I learned the uncertainty principle in high school.
And please don't say,
that I went to a good high school.
Because I didn't.
My school was for people who were kicked out of real high schools.
I just had,
an extremely good physics teacher.

What I didn't learn in high school.
What I guess I always knew.
Was that something like god,
Is simply too complex to express in simple mathmatic terms.
And that all that people can ever learn of god.
Is another person's interpretation of such.
Which doesn't scratch the surface.
Therefore.
I think.
It is you that should study.
Things like repeating patterns and sequences.
Fibonacci.
That exist everywhere around you.
Stephen Hawking maybe.
Maybe Newton, who you will find.
Was brilliant.
But what nobody knew until recently was,
that Newton spent his life chasing down god.
And found nothing.
It's not for us to know.
As far as black and white science.
It's not an issue.
Not with science.
Science is impersonal.
And universal.
SlightlySlightedFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Copyright 2000 - 2013 The Wu-Tang Corp. & shift-one